Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Similarity of human and chimp DNA is down.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Zaius137" data-source="post: 58700496" data-attributes="member: 292689"><p><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">Loudmouth </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">Why don't you take your own advice. You are the one predicting that none of the unaligned sequence is similar to human DNA.</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">Get over it.. because the fact that the chimps genes did not align to human genes as represented in the 2.7Gb/3.1Gb figure. I maintain assumptions can not be made as to their similarity to human DNA, that is unscientific and just opinion. So at most for the time being you cannot assume that these segments align when they do not. At most an 87.5% similarity not the 98.5 similarity, (I believe the lower 62% similarity from the statistical standpoint), not as in the evolution fairytale. I find that the assumption of similarity beyond the science evidence is in fact a biased opinion. This is my last time I deal with you on that subject. </span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">You are the one claiming that the statistical test is valid. You read it and explain why it is valid.</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">Sorry senior not my yob The authors validation for his method is his. As a layperson that is not completely ignorant of statistics I can accept it. IMHO</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">In the rest of your reply I will take it as IYHO If you want to elevate that assessment you bring up a particular objection and exhaust your understanding of it.</span></p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Verdana'">That same old paradigm you have still keeps coming up </span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Zaius137, post: 58700496, member: 292689"] [FONT=Verdana]Loudmouth [/FONT] [FONT=Verdana] [/FONT] [FONT=Verdana]Why don't you take your own advice. You are the one predicting that none of the unaligned sequence is similar to human DNA.[/FONT] [FONT=Verdana] [/FONT] [FONT=Verdana]Get over it.. because the fact that the chimps genes did not align to human genes as represented in the 2.7Gb/3.1Gb figure. I maintain assumptions can not be made as to their similarity to human DNA, that is unscientific and just opinion. So at most for the time being you cannot assume that these segments align when they do not. At most an 87.5% similarity not the 98.5 similarity, (I believe the lower 62% similarity from the statistical standpoint), not as in the evolution fairytale. I find that the assumption of similarity beyond the science evidence is in fact a biased opinion. This is my last time I deal with you on that subject. [/FONT] [FONT=Verdana] [/FONT] [FONT=Verdana]You are the one claiming that the statistical test is valid. You read it and explain why it is valid.[/FONT] [FONT=Verdana] [/FONT] [FONT=Verdana]Sorry senior not my yob The authors validation for his method is his. As a layperson that is not completely ignorant of statistics I can accept it. IMHO[/FONT] [FONT=Verdana] [/FONT] [FONT=Verdana]In the rest of your reply I will take it as IYHO If you want to elevate that assessment you bring up a particular objection and exhaust your understanding of it.[/FONT] [FONT=Verdana] [/FONT] [FONT=Verdana]That same old paradigm you have still keeps coming up [/FONT] [FONT=Times New Roman][SIZE=3] [/SIZE][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Similarity of human and chimp DNA is down.
Top
Bottom