Awesome.
Awesome.
However, will you agree that events that the two events we are talking about defy the laws of physics and biology?
No.
When you speak of the laws of physics and biology, you are referencing what is generally referred to as the "laws of nature". This term is a generic and broad term which encompasses such things like the laws of physics which you mentioned.
These natural laws are simply descriptions of what happens within the universe i.e, they predict what will happen in a closed system. A closed system is one in which there is no causal input into it from the outside. Nothing outside the system is causing something to happen.
But what if a supernatural agent intervenes and causes something to happen (a miracle) which does not lie within the productive power of the things in the universe?
Are the laws violated in such a case?
No. The laws of nature are not violated because they only predict what would happen
in the absence of any sort of divine intervention.
The scientific laws have implicit in them
ceteris paribus conditions, i.e. they predict what will happen all things being equal. So if there is no causal input into this system from without, these naturals laws are descriptions of how the universe will operate.
If there is causal input from outside of the system, these natural laws are not violated after all, for the the law has built into it these implicit conditions.
To conclude, a miracle such as a man rising bodily from the dead or a man walking on water, is not an instance of a violation of the laws of nature. Rather a miracle is an event which does not lie within the productive power of nature, and this points us to a supernatural agent.
If I told you I was able to walk on water, would you believe me?
I would be skeptical and look for evidence that would lend support to your claim, which incidentally, is what one will find if they look for this in Jesus' case.
Your hypothetical and the gospel accounts of the miraculous are not analogous. Your claim is not attended by other miracles. Your claim is not attended by multiple independent eyewitness accounts. You are making the claim on an internet forum, not as a first century Jew whose birth was foretold by prophets long before. Your claim does not come out of a first century Judaistic socio-historical context in which the long awaited messiah was expected to finally come.
There are many things that differentiate you from Jesus and thus, even though you may make the same claims Jesus made, your claims do not carry the same weight as His.
If I told you that I, personally, had witnessed the birth of a child, would you believe me?
Yes.