Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Rapid Emergence
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Loudmouth" data-source="post: 68374679" data-attributes="member: 11790"><p>That is always going to be a retroactive conclusion because the amount of DNA that you inherit from the common ancestor decreases with time. The amount of DNA that orangutans, gorillas, humans, and chimps inherited from their common ancestor is much less than what humans and chimps inherited from their common ancestor.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Then all branches connected to a letter should also have that letter. Using the left tree from your hand drawn diagram (which was very helpful, btw), we will go from bottom to top, left to right. Above U you have AP. One tier above AP, left to right, you should have APB at that single node. At the top tier left to right, you should have APG, APBC, and APBH.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Those changes are also inherited by those further along the branch. I think that is what you forgot to include.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The problem is that B is going to be millions of mutations, so I don't see how they could all be lost with such precision. I would only expect a very tiny minority of B to be lost to indels because they are much more likely to happen elsewhere in the genome.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Loudmouth, post: 68374679, member: 11790"] That is always going to be a retroactive conclusion because the amount of DNA that you inherit from the common ancestor decreases with time. The amount of DNA that orangutans, gorillas, humans, and chimps inherited from their common ancestor is much less than what humans and chimps inherited from their common ancestor. Then all branches connected to a letter should also have that letter. Using the left tree from your hand drawn diagram (which was very helpful, btw), we will go from bottom to top, left to right. Above U you have AP. One tier above AP, left to right, you should have APB at that single node. At the top tier left to right, you should have APG, APBC, and APBH. Those changes are also inherited by those further along the branch. I think that is what you forgot to include. The problem is that B is going to be millions of mutations, so I don't see how they could all be lost with such precision. I would only expect a very tiny minority of B to be lost to indels because they are much more likely to happen elsewhere in the genome. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Rapid Emergence
Top
Bottom