Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Rapid Emergence
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Loudmouth" data-source="post: 68374515" data-attributes="member: 11790"><p>It's not so much an assumption as it is a conclusion from mountains of data. The fact that a comparison between species produces a strong phylogenetic signal is evidence that the shared DNA between those species came from a common ancestor.</p><p></p><p>If you want a term with less baggage, you could use the term "consensus sequence" which is the base that is found in the majority of species at a specific position.</p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"></span></p><p></p><p>Humans and chimps may not have inherited A because it could have changed between the time of the gorilla branching off and chimps branching off.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>We are selecting them based on who they mate with. Once you have a large enough sequence database, you can identify by DNA.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Thanks for the diagram. What are the letters representing, and why did you choose those specific letters? Why isn't AP or ABP the common ancestor? Why does ABQ become AG?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Loudmouth, post: 68374515, member: 11790"] It's not so much an assumption as it is a conclusion from mountains of data. The fact that a comparison between species produces a strong phylogenetic signal is evidence that the shared DNA between those species came from a common ancestor. If you want a term with less baggage, you could use the term "consensus sequence" which is the base that is found in the majority of species at a specific position. [FONT=Arial] [/FONT] Humans and chimps may not have inherited A because it could have changed between the time of the gorilla branching off and chimps branching off. We are selecting them based on who they mate with. Once you have a large enough sequence database, you can identify by DNA. Thanks for the diagram. What are the letters representing, and why did you choose those specific letters? Why isn't AP or ABP the common ancestor? Why does ABQ become AG? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Rapid Emergence
Top
Bottom