Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Rapid Emergence
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Resha Caner" data-source="post: 68371419" data-attributes="member: 269139"><p>OK, but it seems you're saying you don't actually have physical DNA evidence for the common ancestor. You're just assuming the common DNA came from the common ancestor.</p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">Sure. I didn't mean to imply it would. For example, my "G" code for the gorilla line is meant to imply whatever is unique about the gorilla, changing or not. So, "G" can change over time. The only part I was saying would remain constant is the "A" set, which was inherited by all 3 species from their common ancestor.</span></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>OK, that's a new wrinkle. So you're selecting populations based on their morphology. I knew that was the practice at one time, but I thought it was fading away in favor of DNA identification.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No. I guess you're still not understanding my symbols. I'm using it simply to overcome the limitations of CF - as a means for communicating with simple text. I would much rather draw it ... the picture in my head looks like a subway map. Anyway ...</p><p></p><p>Anywhere the same letter appears, it is meant to indicate identity. So, the U in L1, L2, and L3 is identical. In other words, at that time, there is only 1 line - 1 population - 1 species. At that point L1, L2, and L3 are indentical. The same is true of AP. So, from U to AP there is 1 line.</p><p></p><p>After AP it diverges into 2 lines (AG and ABQ). Then ABQ splits again into ABC and ABH so the tree finishes with 3 lines. Is that more clear or will I have to mail you a picture?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Resha Caner, post: 68371419, member: 269139"] OK, but it seems you're saying you don't actually have physical DNA evidence for the common ancestor. You're just assuming the common DNA came from the common ancestor. [FONT=Arial] Sure. I didn't mean to imply it would. For example, my "G" code for the gorilla line is meant to imply whatever is unique about the gorilla, changing or not. So, "G" can change over time. The only part I was saying would remain constant is the "A" set, which was inherited by all 3 species from their common ancestor.[/FONT] OK, that's a new wrinkle. So you're selecting populations based on their morphology. I knew that was the practice at one time, but I thought it was fading away in favor of DNA identification. No. I guess you're still not understanding my symbols. I'm using it simply to overcome the limitations of CF - as a means for communicating with simple text. I would much rather draw it ... the picture in my head looks like a subway map. Anyway ... Anywhere the same letter appears, it is meant to indicate identity. So, the U in L1, L2, and L3 is identical. In other words, at that time, there is only 1 line - 1 population - 1 species. At that point L1, L2, and L3 are indentical. The same is true of AP. So, from U to AP there is 1 line. After AP it diverges into 2 lines (AG and ABQ). Then ABQ splits again into ABC and ABH so the tree finishes with 3 lines. Is that more clear or will I have to mail you a picture? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Rapid Emergence
Top
Bottom