So are you saying its subjective to interpretation?
Some things are obvious. Something are not.So everyone interprets the stories differently?
As far as I can see, atheism doesn't provide you with any sort of objective grounding for what you might consider moral.
Some things are obvious. Something are not
No your confused. AIKI and I, are talking about two different things.Seems that you two have a bit of a disagreement based on your subjective interpretations..
In the context of this discussion they are not really different. Since the claimed "objective Christian morals" are the direct result of someone's interpretation of the bible, and since interpretation is a subjective process, then there's no way the morals can be objective. The only conclusion one could make is that Christian morals are the result of subjective interpretation of the bible.He's talking about, atheism not having objective morals
I'm talking about interpreting the bible.
They are two different subjects
That's ok. It's a forum. Glad your in enjoying it lol.In the context of this discussion they are not really different. Since the claimed "objective Christian morals" are the direct result of someone's interpretation of the bible, and since interpretation is a subjective process, then there's no way the morals can be objective. The only conclusion one could make is that Christian morals are the result of subjective interpretation of the bible.
Evidence of this subjectivity is seen in every corner of Christianity and in every time frame from current events to as far back in history as we can go. In fact, evolution of these subjectively interpreted morals continues to this day.
Its been an interesting conversation. Thank you very much for your time and input.