This does have to do with the OP since Hillary Clinton is the Planned Parenthood candidate. And Hillary Clinton (essentially a third Obama term) would kill the Pro-Life movement and would mean more Christians put on trial for our faith. A Hillary presidency would also be a disaster for foreign policy since she promises more of the same with how the US deals with Islamic terrorism. Remember that you were the first to mention the name of a specific political candidate.No I am not waiting for the perfect candidate thus side of heaven. But I am looking for a feasible one that I can vote for with a clear conscience and with some hope. If this turns political it will have to be moved. Maybe we should discuss the content of the OP instead.
No. What does the article say? And why did I bring up a candidate? Read the OP. Read the thread responses. Seriously. I do not know why I bother.This does have to do with the OP since Hillary Clinton is the Planned Parenthood candidate. And Hillary Clinton (essentially a third Obama term) would kill the Pro-Life movement and would mean more Christians put on trial for our faith. A Hillary presidency would also be a disaster for foreign policy since she promises more of the same with how the US deals with Islamic terrorism. Remember that you were the first to mention the name of a specific political candidate.
The OP article talks about how the Democratic party is connected with George Soros and Planned Parenthood.No. What does the article say? And why did I bring up a candidate? Read the OP. Read the thread responses. Seriously. I do not know why I bother.
The OP article talks about how the Democratic party is connected with George Soros and Planned Parenthood.
The Pro-Life movement involves being active in politics. That's why the article you posted mentions how the Democratic party, George Soros, and Planned Parenthood are connected. I never said that Trump is the perfect candidate. But he's far better than Hillary Clinton. We simply can't afford another four years of Obama. If she gets elected, it would kill the Pro-Life movement, and our only option left would be to pray for Jesus' Second Coming.I think you need to take those political lenses off. It prevents us from discussing the issues at hand from a fsith based perspective. There us no political oarty or earthly leader that is going to usher in heaven on earth. It is about what we can do as individual Christisns. And it is going to take more than a vote.
The Pro-Life movement involves being active in politics. That's why the article you posted mentions how the Democratic party, George Soros, and Planned Parenthood are connected. I never said that Trump is the perfect candidate. But he's far better than Hillary Clinton. We simply can't afford another four years of Obama. If she gets elected, it would kill the Pro-Life movement, and our only option left would be to pray for Jesus' Second Coming.
What can WE do?
Abortions have decreased throughout Obama's presidency. Four more years of that would mean each year with fewer and fewer abortionsThe Pro-Life movement involves being active in politics. That's why the article you posted mentions how the Democratic party, George Soros, and Planned Parenthood are connected. I never said that Trump is the perfect candidate. But he's far better than Hillary Clinton. We simply can't afford another four years of Obama. If she gets elected, it would kill the Pro-Life movement, and our only option left would be to pray for Jesus' Second Coming.
I will not be voting for any Planned Parenthood candidate. I will be voting for McMullen. Sadly, my state will go for the Planned Parenthood standardbearer candidate no matter who I vote for. Lots of 'good' catholics seem to plan on voting for the Planned Parenthood standardbearer candidate.It's important that Pro-Life Christians vote against the Planned Parenthood candidate.
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke
No. The fault is with those who actually vote for Hillary. Some fault lies with the Republican Party for picking Trump instead of a sensible candidate. As a Republican who tried mightily to prevent the party from picking Trump, we failed to present an adequate candidate although we had many good options. Blaming people who cannot support Trump is the wrong answer.Go ahead abandon America and babies, but if hillry wins an opens the floodgates to abortion and ISIS it will be your fault and people that refuse to vote the right way because they are more ideologues than realist
It's important that Pro-Life Christians vote against the Planned Parenthood candidate.
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke
LivingWordUnity said: ↑
It's important that Pro-Life Christians vote against the Planned Parenthood candidate.
So I guess that's a vote specifically for Hillary?Abortions have decreased throughout Obama's presidency. Four more years of that would mean each year with fewer and fewer abortions
There ARE other options out there than voting for a candidate that is unacceptable to prevent another unacceptable candidate from winning. But as long as people will vote for Trump to stop Hillary or vote for Hillary to stop Trump we will get one of them.And as long as their reasons for voting for "the Planned Parenthood candidate" but because of other compelling reasons (e.g. Trump's tempermental and character-related unfitness to be President would top my list) there is nothing wrong with that.
Well, people say Clinton would be a continuation of Obama. Abortions have decreased significantly under Obama. and while it's not zero, any fewer abortions are a step in the right direction. Something is happening to reduce abortions under Obama, and that's good. Each of us would rejoice if we stopped one person from having an abortion, so we can take comfort in that many fewer abortions are occuring.So I guess that's a vote specifically for Hillary?
Trumps the best we have. The problem is people automatically assume he is bad. The people who don't vote for Trump are saying they are okay with abortion and PP, the US is only a two party system not multi-party so any vote not for trump is a vote for hillyNo. The fault is with those who actually vote for Hillary. Some fault lies with the Republican Party for picking Trump instead of a sensible candidate. As a Republican who tried mightily to prevent the party from picking Trump, we failed to present an adequate candidate although we had many good options. Blaming people who cannot support Trump is the wrong answer.
Trumps the best we have. The problem is people automatically assume he is bad. The people who don't vote for Trump are saying they are okay with abortion and PP, the US is only a two party system not multi-party so any vote not for trump is a vote for hilly
Fellow Christians! Stop relying on politics. What can WE do? About the actual problem? Not what we think power mad candidates can do for us.