Presidential debate #1

Who won the debate?

  • Obama

  • McCain

  • Tied


Results are only viewable after voting.
N

Nathan45

Guest
anyway from what little I watched:

McCain is nuts for suggesting a "freeze" on all "non-military, non-entitlement" spending. Obama was right to call that a hatchet-job.

I wish Obama would say something new and interesting, rather than repeat the same non-controversial populist talking points he's been giving ever since he seemed like the frontrunner. I kindof miss the days when he was the unknown underdog, where his job was to say something that gets your attention and makes you remember him.

Now, he's the frontrunner, so his sole aim is to not put his foot in his mouth... He has a very risk-averse campaign style.
 
Upvote 0
N

Nathan45

Guest
Hmm, I was doing a couple things when it started, but it seemed to me like they glazed over whether or not to do it.

McCain said he'd "like to" vote for the bailout bill, when asked if he would vote for it. Obama pretty much concurred, although i don't recall a direct statement. eitherway, arguing the details of the bailout bill pretty much implies that you'd support it in some form.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Staccato

Tarut keeps on dreaming
Site Supporter
Sep 9, 2007
4,479
304
From Colorado, currently in the UK
✟51,802.00
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
The moderator in this debate leaves an awful lot to be desired. McCain always seems to get the 'last word' on a question. Obama isn't allowed a rebuttal to McCain's final points as they have to "move on to another question", but McCain is allowed to talk over Obama and the moderator in order to rebut Obama's final claims.

And yes, the choice of questions is quite poor. Admittedly this concentrated on foreign policy but do the questions really have to be on issues that the candidates have already elucidated, at length, their positions on elsewhere? Why not throw a curveball or two in there to actually force the candidates to break from pre-rehearsed rhetoric.

Not impressed with it at all. I hope the other debates are of higher quality
 
Upvote 0

Staccato

Tarut keeps on dreaming
Site Supporter
Sep 9, 2007
4,479
304
From Colorado, currently in the UK
✟51,802.00
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
"Obama doesn't understand" is totally appropriate, because he doesn't. Oh and by the way, we're 85 min. in and Obama has 38 "uh"s and "eh-eh-eh"s.

Because that's really important.

It took McCain three attempts to pronounce "Ahmadinejad".

/pedantry
 
Upvote 0
N

Nathan45

Guest
I think it's a tie so far, with each one appealing to their base.
McCain wasn't nuts for suggesting a freeze, that's exactly what the far right wants to hear, and non-defense, non-entitlement.... is there anything other than pork-barrel that doesn't fall into those?

oh i don't know, maybe -- half-completed years-planned infrastructure, half-completed years planned scientific research projects, education, energy issues, environmental issues ... do i really need to list all of the stuff the government funds that, even if you want to cut it, should be phased out rather than just hatcheted with a "freeze"? I mean, when we talk about a "freeze", are we talking about someone's government funded payroll?
 
Upvote 0

Rotator

Shhhhhh.....
Dec 30, 2006
667
64
✟1,139.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
The moderator in this debate leaves an awful lot to be desired. McCain always seems to get the 'last word' on a question. Obama isn't allowed a rebuttal to McCain's final points as they have to "move on to another question", but McCain is allowed to talk over Obama and the moderator in order to rebut Obama's final claims.

And yes, the choice of questions is quite poor. Admittedly this concentrated on foreign policy but do the questions really have to be on issues that the candidates have already elucidated, at length, their positions on elsewhere? Why not throw a curveball or two in there to actually force the candidates to break from pre-rehearsed rhetoric.

Not impressed with it at all. I hope the other debates are of higher quality
<staff edit> Lehrer is doing a much better job than I thought he'd do. if either man doesn't answer the question and starts on a rote answer, Lehrer cuts him off and reminds him of the original question.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Staccato

Tarut keeps on dreaming
Site Supporter
Sep 9, 2007
4,479
304
From Colorado, currently in the UK
✟51,802.00
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Lehrer is doing a much better job than I thought he'd do.

Seeing as I'd never heard of the guy he's doing a better job than I thought he'd do too. But it's still terrible.

if either man doesn't answer the question and starts on a rote answer, Lehrer cuts him off and reminds him of the original question.

Cuts them off if they start a rote answer? Are we watching the same debate? Every word out of the mouths of the candidates has been so pre-rehearsed and polished the glare is almost blinding ;)
 
Upvote 0

tosety

Newbie
Jul 31, 2008
37
1
✟7,663.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
good point, but what's a "freeze" anyway? zero spending or zero increase in spending? quite vague, so it makes us conservatives happy without actually committing to anything that isn't easy to back away from or compromise out of
I would call it a great way for a conservative to start a budget negotiation,
lots of room for compromise
oh i don't know, maybe -- half-completed years-planned infrastructure, half-completed years planned scientific research projects, education, energy issues, environmental issues ... do i really need to list all of the stuff the government funds that, even if you want to cut it, should be phased out rather than just hatcheted with a "freeze"? I mean, when we talk about a "freeze", are we talking about someone's government funded payroll?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Ginny

I like to whisper, too!
Feb 22, 2005
7,028
655
here
✟18,148.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
"Obama doesn't understand" is totally appropriate, because he doesn't. Oh and by the way, we're 85 min. in and Obama has 38 "uh"s and "eh-eh-eh"s.


I don't think there is anything wrong with saying someone doesn't understand something...and I am truly trying to not be biased...I think it started off okay...although I found it utterly embarrassing and ridiculous that Jim was so "in your face" trying to get them to start bickering. I mean, c'mon, requesting that they literally look at one another? He just wanted crap to hit the fan under his watch.

If I were an Obama supporter, I would think he did an okay job as far as debates go....As a Republican, I also think that McCain did "okay". I do feel that McCain's experience really came through tonight. If you go in knowing who you already support, of course that will not impress you as an Obama supporter. If you don't have a clue, I think McCain was more impressive. Resumes do count. Sorry.

As far as saying "uh" and "em" a lot, does it matter in the grand scheme of things? No. People will somehow notice it and I bet if you were to google it tomorrow someone somewhere would be writing a 2 page article on it.

I did get tickled at McCain....how he kept laughing to himself anytime he disagreed.....but then Obama started doing that at the end, too.

One thing my husband noticed right off was the amount of make-up that Obama was wearing.

That's all I have for now.
 
Upvote 0