I figure I'm not the only one watching right now, what's your take on how it's going down?
Who do you think has won? (will add a poll after it's over)
Who do you think has won? (will add a poll after it's over)
that was the first question, and they both basically implied they'd support a bailout in some form by going full speed ahead into arguing the details of the bailout.I'm still in shock there was no question about whether or not to do the bailout, but what to do after they spend the money.
Hmm, I was doing a couple things when it started, but it seemed to me like they glazed over whether or not to do it.
"Obama doesn't understand" is totally appropriate, because he doesn't. Oh and by the way, we're 85 min. in and Obama has 38 "uh"s and "eh-eh-eh"s.
I think it's a tie so far, with each one appealing to their base.
McCain wasn't nuts for suggesting a freeze, that's exactly what the far right wants to hear, and non-defense, non-entitlement.... is there anything other than pork-barrel that doesn't fall into those?
<staff edit> Lehrer is doing a much better job than I thought he'd do. if either man doesn't answer the question and starts on a rote answer, Lehrer cuts him off and reminds him of the original question.The moderator in this debate leaves an awful lot to be desired. McCain always seems to get the 'last word' on a question. Obama isn't allowed a rebuttal to McCain's final points as they have to "move on to another question", but McCain is allowed to talk over Obama and the moderator in order to rebut Obama's final claims.
And yes, the choice of questions is quite poor. Admittedly this concentrated on foreign policy but do the questions really have to be on issues that the candidates have already elucidated, at length, their positions on elsewhere? Why not throw a curveball or two in there to actually force the candidates to break from pre-rehearsed rhetoric.
Not impressed with it at all. I hope the other debates are of higher quality
Lehrer is doing a much better job than I thought he'd do.
if either man doesn't answer the question and starts on a rote answer, Lehrer cuts him off and reminds him of the original question.
oh i don't know, maybe -- half-completed years-planned infrastructure, half-completed years planned scientific research projects, education, energy issues, environmental issues ... do i really need to list all of the stuff the government funds that, even if you want to cut it, should be phased out rather than just hatcheted with a "freeze"? I mean, when we talk about a "freeze", are we talking about someone's government funded payroll?
"Obama doesn't understand" is totally appropriate, because he doesn't. Oh and by the way, we're 85 min. in and Obama has 38 "uh"s and "eh-eh-eh"s.