Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Pandemic started in a lab:
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="whatbogsends" data-source="post: 77168381" data-attributes="member: 11978"><p>That's an outright falsehood.</p><p></p><p>It became a partisan issue when Democrats aligned behind the skewed "Proximal Origins" Lancet article which was intended to shut down debate on the origin of Covid. The authors of this article had initially thought that the virus looked "potentially engineered" and "inconsistent with expectations of evolutionary biology".</p><p></p><p>Yet, within 3 days of a team of scientists (Andersen and Holmes among them) emailing Fauci with this concerning revelation, Andersen used the phrase "crackpot theory" to describe lab leak and likened it to "conspiracy theory" in Proximal Origins.</p><p></p><p>Tell me, when was the last time you called an assessment that you and several of your colleagues had 72 hours prior "crackpot" (or crazy, or what have you)? FOIA emails show that the _intent_ of Proximal Origins was to put the issue to rest.</p><p></p><p>Before publication, the article was sent to Fauci for his personal review. When he presented it to the public, he spoke as if he had just heard of the article upon its release.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="whatbogsends, post: 77168381, member: 11978"] That's an outright falsehood. It became a partisan issue when Democrats aligned behind the skewed "Proximal Origins" Lancet article which was intended to shut down debate on the origin of Covid. The authors of this article had initially thought that the virus looked "potentially engineered" and "inconsistent with expectations of evolutionary biology". Yet, within 3 days of a team of scientists (Andersen and Holmes among them) emailing Fauci with this concerning revelation, Andersen used the phrase "crackpot theory" to describe lab leak and likened it to "conspiracy theory" in Proximal Origins. Tell me, when was the last time you called an assessment that you and several of your colleagues had 72 hours prior "crackpot" (or crazy, or what have you)? FOIA emails show that the _intent_ of Proximal Origins was to put the issue to rest. Before publication, the article was sent to Fauci for his personal review. When he presented it to the public, he spoke as if he had just heard of the article upon its release. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Pandemic started in a lab:
Top
Bottom