Ocasio-Cortez says Trump win would result in ‘grave impacts’ on democracy

[driewerf]

Remember all those many times over the last few years that prosecutors and the DoJ have gone after those who disagree with the Democratic Party ruling class?

Do you (dis)agree with the "Democratic Party ruling class"? Why aren't you arrested yet?

 

[KCfromNC]

Remind me which political party leaders have been using the justice system in the USA to investigate and go after people who disagree with what the ruling class establishment leaders are doing?

Yes, another example of Mr. Trump's failings : "Lock her up!"

 

[KCfromNC]

Are there any? Is being a Marxist illegal?

Must be that cancel culture stuff we've been hearing so much about recently.

 

[BCP1928]

Only if they commit crimes.

Still, I think prosecutors or other persons who advocate overthrowing the government by violent means ought to at least be given the side eye.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Do you (dis)agree with the "Democratic Party ruling class"? Why aren't you arrested yet?

Insufficient jail capacity

 

[Valletta]

And in the meanwhile, another Republican "star witness" in a closed session tells Republicans there is no evidence of Joe Biden doing anything illegal or even having anything to do with Hunters business or anything to do with Burisma.
Not 100% related to the topic, but shouldn't be missed or forgotten either.

Could you be more vague? I have no problem with closed door testimony, the special prosecutor was correct to interview Joe in private. But once a decision or report has been made that testimony should all be available to the public, with rare redactions such as for national security. If it is lost or destroyed that damages the credibility of the initial body.

 

[BCP1928]

Could you be more vague? I have no problem with closed door testimony, the special prosecutor was correct to interview Joe in private. But once a decision or report has been made that testimony should all be available to the public, with rare redactions such as for national security. If it is lost or destroyed that damages the credibility of the initial body.

And in the meantime, out-of-context excerpts can be spun off to Tucker Carlson. Good plan.

 

[7thKeeper]

Could you be more vague?

Yes, yes I could.

I have no problem with closed door testimony, the special prosecutor was correct to interview Joe in private. But once a decision or report has been made that testimony should all be available to the public, with rare redactions such as for national security. If it is lost or destroyed that damages the credibility of the initial body.

You full well know that that's not what this is about. They're held closed because so far, every single one of the Republican witnesses that has been brought in has straight up told that there is no evidence of Biden having done anything illegal regarding the topic. And having that done in public repeatedly in front of cameras is too much during this fishing expedition. With these held closed, Republicans can at least try to limit or direct the message of what goes on behind the doors.

 

[wing2000]

Are you implying that Marxist prosecutors should not be investigated?

Hey, I thought the 1950's were behind us.

 

[stevil]

The targeting of Trump associates: During the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election, several Trump associates were targeted by the DOJ, including Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn, and Roger Stone. Many conservatives saw this as an attempt to undermine the Trump presidency and delegitimize his victory.

The Special Council Robert Mueller was hired by the Republican Acting Attorney General, who set the criteria for the investigation and oversaw it.

Why do people that love Trump keep insisting that any of this was the Dems coming after Trump?

 

[BCP1928]

The Special Council Robert Mueller was hired by the Republican Acting Attorney General, who set the criteria for the investigation and oversaw it.

Why do people that love Trump keep insisting that any of this was the Dems coming after Trump?

Because they were all in it together, the globalist neo-liberals, the Deep State. But the Democrats, nothing but a bunch of elitist liberals anyway, are subjects of the Deep State. Only Trump can destroy the Deep State and drive out its lackeys, the woke Democrats

 

[A2SG]

Because they were all in it together, the globalist neo-liberals, the Deep State. But the Democrats, nothing but a bunch of elitist liberals anyway, are subjects of the Deep State. Only Trump can destroy the Deep State and drive out its lackeys, the woke Democrats

-- A2SG, still on sale.....

 

[wing2000]

So then, it appears that if someone disagrees with the ruling class, that you are implying this is breaking the law????

Tip: when you use this "ruling class" language, you sound like a Marxist.

 

[Vambram]

Tip: when you use this "ruling class" language, you sound like a Marxist.

No, I am merely describing reality in the USA.