Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
"Obamacare"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dogs4thewin" data-source="post: 61092189" data-attributes="member: 306387"><p>Actually cities do have fire insurance. Each person pays an amount for fire protection and if you do not pay the fire department does NOT HAVE TO put out a fire on your house. Why refuse a liver transplant? If I KNOW I will still have to take DAILY medication for life to control my seizures and thus would just keep messing up the liver, particularly if the DONOR took medication why not give it to someone who may or may not be on medication as I have no control over their choice to accept or not. By the way you STILL have one of the same problems with the NHS. People who KNOW they are fatally ill with NO hope of getting better should NOT keep receiving treatment. I have noticed that the people forced to pay for it directly are less likely to do so. AKA the insured.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dogs4thewin, post: 61092189, member: 306387"] Actually cities do have fire insurance. Each person pays an amount for fire protection and if you do not pay the fire department does NOT HAVE TO put out a fire on your house. Why refuse a liver transplant? If I KNOW I will still have to take DAILY medication for life to control my seizures and thus would just keep messing up the liver, particularly if the DONOR took medication why not give it to someone who may or may not be on medication as I have no control over their choice to accept or not. By the way you STILL have one of the same problems with the NHS. People who KNOW they are fatally ill with NO hope of getting better should NOT keep receiving treatment. I have noticed that the people forced to pay for it directly are less likely to do so. AKA the insured. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
"Obamacare"
Top
Bottom