MKJ
Contributor
Political leaders often get invited to speak about issues in other countries. That is not all that weird or controversial.
I think given what he was talking about, his observation may have been correct. I do not know that integrated schools would be the only or quickest way to make progress, but I am sure there are a number of possibilities. If schools are in fact causing a lot of problems with the way they are teaching, it could be there is a need for the state to step in.
More generally - I am not convinced that separate schools run by religious, or other, communities are a bad thing. In Canada and the US, where for the most part there is only one or two options for public schools, the segregation is clearly by economics. The least well off go to public schools, the most well of to private schools, and those in the middle may do either of those, or homeschool, or go to the better public schools in better districts including by driving their kids to other districts.
I tend to think the British system where any religious school can receive public funding is much better. It tends to be much more respectful of religion as a real part of public life. The system in the US, while trying to level the playing field for religion or non-religion, actually works towards a disrespect of most religion.
In some countries of course they have good systems which are public and universal, and private schools are almost non-existant. They provide really good education to kids in their local communities. That seems like a better option at least that what we have now in North America, though it would mean fewer options. Mind you, those countries have considerably less of an income gap.
I think given what he was talking about, his observation may have been correct. I do not know that integrated schools would be the only or quickest way to make progress, but I am sure there are a number of possibilities. If schools are in fact causing a lot of problems with the way they are teaching, it could be there is a need for the state to step in.
More generally - I am not convinced that separate schools run by religious, or other, communities are a bad thing. In Canada and the US, where for the most part there is only one or two options for public schools, the segregation is clearly by economics. The least well off go to public schools, the most well of to private schools, and those in the middle may do either of those, or homeschool, or go to the better public schools in better districts including by driving their kids to other districts.
I tend to think the British system where any religious school can receive public funding is much better. It tends to be much more respectful of religion as a real part of public life. The system in the US, while trying to level the playing field for religion or non-religion, actually works towards a disrespect of most religion.
In some countries of course they have good systems which are public and universal, and private schools are almost non-existant. They provide really good education to kids in their local communities. That seems like a better option at least that what we have now in North America, though it would mean fewer options. Mind you, those countries have considerably less of an income gap.
Upvote
0