Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Obama Administration Approves use of Drone to kill US Citizen
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Schneiderman" data-source="post: 54713956" data-attributes="member: 230055"><p>Oh really? First of all let me point out your ad hominem. Then I'll point out that you have added absolutely nothing at all to this discussion other than putting your hands to your ears and going "lalalala". Now I'll ask you to provide an example, just one example to demonstrate my "poor record of debating", or however many as you like because I hate leaving loose ends and I'm not aware of any debates on this forum, or any other forum, where I have not left either leaving opponents unable to refute significant facts and evidence, or acknowledging that an issue is ambiguous and not worth further discussion. But I know that most people like to disagree with me here on everything so here's your chance and everyone elses', go ahead and demonstrate my "poor record". I don't think I have ever been involved in an argument here where my opponents matched my level of validity and soundness in argument. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>You apparently don't know what a strawman is so maybe you should focus on your own skills in debate. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>What policy? This statement doesn't even make sense. Tell me when this has happened before, tell me what policy covers this situation. I must not have heard about the Kill US Civilians Without Due Process Act. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Oh the irony.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And there is no tea pot orbiting the earth. You're really going to insult me by attacking my knowledge of debate and then tell me my argument is bad because I failed to prove a negative? You need to leave this forum and learn something about the rules of logic before you start involving yourself in these kinds of discussions. You are embarrassing yourself. </p><p></p><p>I am not getting paid to be a teacher, you don't deserve this but I'll give you a freebie. You can't prove a negative. The burden of prove is on the positive. You have to show me the due process that was carried out, you have to prove that the act was justified. What is this policy you are talking about? You show me the "DoJ or DoD guidelines" that cover this situation, mister "poor record of debate". </p><p></p><p>Seriously, I feel like I was just told that I don't know how to ride a motorcycle by someone that paralyzed himself the first time he ever tried to ride.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And you do? So what are they?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Schneiderman, post: 54713956, member: 230055"] Oh really? First of all let me point out your ad hominem. Then I'll point out that you have added absolutely nothing at all to this discussion other than putting your hands to your ears and going "lalalala". Now I'll ask you to provide an example, just one example to demonstrate my "poor record of debating", or however many as you like because I hate leaving loose ends and I'm not aware of any debates on this forum, or any other forum, where I have not left either leaving opponents unable to refute significant facts and evidence, or acknowledging that an issue is ambiguous and not worth further discussion. But I know that most people like to disagree with me here on everything so here's your chance and everyone elses', go ahead and demonstrate my "poor record". I don't think I have ever been involved in an argument here where my opponents matched my level of validity and soundness in argument. You apparently don't know what a strawman is so maybe you should focus on your own skills in debate. What policy? This statement doesn't even make sense. Tell me when this has happened before, tell me what policy covers this situation. I must not have heard about the Kill US Civilians Without Due Process Act. Oh the irony. And there is no tea pot orbiting the earth. You're really going to insult me by attacking my knowledge of debate and then tell me my argument is bad because I failed to prove a negative? You need to leave this forum and learn something about the rules of logic before you start involving yourself in these kinds of discussions. You are embarrassing yourself. I am not getting paid to be a teacher, you don't deserve this but I'll give you a freebie. You can't prove a negative. The burden of prove is on the positive. You have to show me the due process that was carried out, you have to prove that the act was justified. What is this policy you are talking about? You show me the "DoJ or DoD guidelines" that cover this situation, mister "poor record of debate". Seriously, I feel like I was just told that I don't know how to ride a motorcycle by someone that paralyzed himself the first time he ever tried to ride. And you do? So what are they? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Obama Administration Approves use of Drone to kill US Citizen
Top
Bottom