No Greater Love -

[joshua 1 9]

The Bible says: "There is no greater love than to lay down one's life for one's friends."

I was wondering if the Atheistic Evolutionists could explain how this works. We know that Love is a very powerful, even if there are different kinds of love. In this case we talk about the love that one friend has for another (philía, Greek: φιλία).

For Evolution - Self-preservation is a behavior that ensures the survival of an organism. Would this not create some sort of a conflict that a organism would be willing to sacrifice itself for the preservation of something other then itself.

As Christians we are told: "Love your enemies, do good to them, and lend to them, expecting nothing in return. Then your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Most High" Does this then become a law onto itself. If we love others or if we do good onto others then good will come back to us?

Just how does an organism preserve itself by sacrificing itself?

 

[AV1611VET]

I was wondering if the Atheistic Evolutionists could explain how this works.

There is no love in evolution.

In fact, the first four letters of evolution is "love" spelled backwards.

Just how does an organism preserve itself by sacrificing itself?

In evolution, there are two subsets of families that live on the earth: the Fights and the Flights.

The Fight family stomps around claiming territory for their own.

The Flight family runs around avoiding the Fight family.

An example of the Fight family would be the Mongols.

An example of the Flight family would be the Jews.

Do you think it's coincidental that they are referred to as "nomads"?

What baffles scientists though, is that the Jews now have their own homeland and are now Fighters.

Quite effective fighters.

And so scientists scratch their heads, wondering how one subset of the human race can change over to another.

In their estimation, they are, and will forever be, "desert nomads," undeserving of any real estate to call their own.

Unless, of course, scientists can drum up some excuse for Israel deserving Israel, so as not to incur the charge of antizionism.

And as usual, some scientists do.

And they do it by "blaming" it on the government.

Just like they blame their gaffs on big pharmaceuticals, administration, and the government.

But we Christians are different.

We "blame" Israel living in Israel as a fulfillment of prophecy.

Something scientists deny.

And that's why they hate the Bible too.

It is Israel's "land contract from God" that convinces Christians they have a right to that land.

With the Bible out of the way, scientists can claim that Israel stole the land from the Canaanites via genocide.

 

[Robert Palase]

An example of the Flight family would be the Jews.

Tell that to the Arabs who fought them in the six day war in 1967, they found out they were the Fight family.

 

[Goonie]

Tell that to the Arabs who fought them in the six day war in 1967, they found out they were the Fight family.

You need to read the rest of AVs post.

 

[AV1611VET]

Tell that to the Arabs who fought them in the six day war in 1967, they found out they were the Fight family.

Isn't that what I basically said?

What did you think I meant, when I said this ...

What baffles scientists though, is that the Jews now have their own homeland and are now Fighters.

 

[AV1611VET]

You need to read the rest of AVs post.

IMO, Robert Palase is consol.

'Nuff said.

 

[joshua 1 9]

There is no love in evolution.

In fact, the first four letters of evolution is "love" spelled backwards.In evolution, there are two subsets of families that live on the earth: the Fights and the Flights.

The Fight family stomps around claiming territory for their own.

The Flight family runs around avoiding the Fight family.

An example of the Fight family would be the Mongols.

An example of the Flight family would be the Jews.

Do you think it's coincidental that they are referred to as "nomads"?

What baffles scientists though, is that the Jews now have their own homeland and are now Fighters.

Quite effective fighters.

And so scientists scratch their heads, wondering how one subset of the human race can change over to another.

In their estimation, they are, and will forever be, "desert nomads," undeserving of any real estate to call their own.

Unless, of course, scientists can drum up some excuse for Israel deserving Israel, so as not to incur the charge of antizionism.

And as usual, some scientists do.

And they do it by "blaming" it on the government.

Just like they blame their gaffs on big pharmaceuticals, administration, and the government.

But we Christians are different.

We "blame" Israel living in Israel as a fulfillment of prophecy.

Something scientists deny.

And that's why they hate the Bible too.

It is Israel's "land contract from God" that convinces Christians they have a right to that land.

With the Bible out of the way, scientists can claim that Israel stole the land from the Canaanites via genocide.

That is why they fight the genealogies that go from Adam to David to Jesus. Satan will be bound for 1,000 years and we will rule with Jesus for 1,000 years here on the earth. They try to say Adam was not a real person, they even try to claim the David and Jesus were not real.

Rev20:2 And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,

Isa 22:22 "And the key of the house of David will I lay upon his shoulder; so he shall open, and none shall shut; and he shall shut, and none shall open."

Rev 3:7 "To the angel of the church in Philadelphia write: These are the words of the One who is holy and true, who holds the key of David. What He opens,no one will shut; and what He shuts, no one will open."

 

[joshua 1 9]

Tell that to the Arabs who fought them in the six day war in 1967, they found out they were the Fight family.

This represents the Battle between the flesh and the spirit.

Gal 4:22 For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by the slave woman and the other by the free woman. 23 His son by the slave woman was born according to the flesh, but his son by the free woman was born because of the promise. 24 These things serve as illustrations, for the women represent two covenants. One covenant is from Mount Sinai and bears children into slavery: This is Hagar.…

 

[Robert Palase]

IMO, Robert Palase is consol.

'Nuff said.

Everyone is a fighter if they are given no other choice.

Consol? who is consol? is it someone who disagrees with you?

From your writings I have gathered this much. if you spent as much time and effort living your life as you do trying to turn your dreams into reality you would be much better off, saying things like 'science can take a hike' while typing on a computer puts you firmly in the 'I'm delusional' camp, you could be a force for sense and knowledge instead of ignorance and foolishness.

 

[AV1611VET]

That is why they fight the genealogies that go from Adam to David to Jesus.

No doubt.

They try to say Adam was not a real person,

That's so they can replace him with their own brand of Adam: y-Adam.

 

[AV1611VET]

Consol? who is consol?

Someone suffering from amnesia?

 

[Robert Palase]

Someone suffering from amnesia?

Are you consol?

 

[Goonie]

Are you consol?

No I'm consul! and so's my wife!

 

[AV1611VET]

Are you consol?

No, sir.

I've had the same gender for amost 62 years now.

 

[Robert Palase]

No, sir.

I've had the same gender for amost 62 years now.

I don't know what gender has to do with it but did you choose your gender as some "Christians" say gays do?

 

[essentialsaltes]

For Evolution - Self-preservation is a behavior that ensures the survival of an organism. Would this not create some sort of a conflict that a organism would be willing to sacrifice itself for the preservation of something other then itself.

...

Just how does an organism preserve itself by sacrificing itself?

Evolutionary scientists have looked into altruism for quite a while now.

 

[Speedwell]

For Evolution - Self-preservation is a behavior that ensures the survival of an organism. Would this not create some sort of a conflict that a organism would be willing to sacrifice itself for the preservation of something other then itself.

For evolution, self-preservation is important only insofar as it ensures survival of the species. Consequently, cooperative behavior, nurturing and even altruism are to be expected.

 

[Robert Palase]

For Evolution - Self-preservation is a behavior that ensures the survival of an organism. Would this not create some sort of a conflict that a organism would be willing to sacrifice itself for the preservation of something other then itself.

Why does every mother in the animal kingdom protect it's young? surly if self-preservation was paramount it would run and leave it's young to be eaten while it escaped, why don't they?

 

[joshua 1 9]

Why does every mother in the animal kingdom protect it's young? surly if self-preservation was paramount it would run and leave it's young to be eaten while it escaped, why don't they?

Why don't they? It has to do with hormones and the way the primitive brain works. Humans still have a primitive brain or a base nature but they have the advanced brain that is a layered over the primitive brain.

 

[joshua 1 9]

Consol? who is consol? is it someone who disagrees with you?

Someone disagree with AV? How can that be? He has 28,989 likes to your 11