Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
no evidence for evolution
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="seebs" data-source="post: 210158" data-attributes="member: 2070"><p>I think there's a difference between "no evidence which could not possibly be consistent with anything but evolution" and "no evidence for evolution".</p><p></p><p>I have no evidence for God's existance that can't be handwaved away as hallucination, coincidence, wishful thinking, or hearsay... and yet, He continues to exist anyway. At some point, it is reasonable to take an explanation which is consistent with all the available data.</p><p></p><p>As to the argument about abiogenesis: These are totally different things, just as a discussion of levitical law is very different from a discussion of Christian theories of salvation. Yes, they're part of the same story, but each of them has very different context - although one paves the way for the other.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="seebs, post: 210158, member: 2070"] I think there's a difference between "no evidence which could not possibly be consistent with anything but evolution" and "no evidence for evolution". I have no evidence for God's existance that can't be handwaved away as hallucination, coincidence, wishful thinking, or hearsay... and yet, He continues to exist anyway. At some point, it is reasonable to take an explanation which is consistent with all the available data. As to the argument about abiogenesis: These are totally different things, just as a discussion of levitical law is very different from a discussion of Christian theories of salvation. Yes, they're part of the same story, but each of them has very different context - although one paves the way for the other. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
no evidence for evolution
Top
Bottom