Listen to millions of testimonies from faithful Hindus and Buddhists...are they deluded? I can also quite easily say that following the path of dhama, the noble eightfold path, is the way, the truth and the life.
What Aethelfrith clearly means is that Christians are judge by their faith and not the good things they do. In Christianity, contrary to Buddhism and heathenism, you don't reach enlightenment by being a good person but instead by a faith in the Christ; there is no reason to strive to be good if you sincerely believe in Christ.
now here is where I am beginning to have problems with your comments....what you do with your choice is up to you, understanding Christianity is another matter....Where what we do or don't do is not going to get us into heaven, the bible tells us that when we become a believer, the Holy Spirit, that is God becomes our helper to love. Now love here is the biblical love, and the shortest possible definition I can apply to it is putting others above ourselves. It isn't a warm fuzzy feeling, it is help, obedience, humility, etc. I Cor. 13 gives us a pretty good picture though not a complete one....anyway, christianity at it's core is a call to love all men, to love God, with a sacrifical love that is only possible through the power of the Holy Spirit living within. That doesn't seem at all like what you are posting here, though admittedly, I might have missed something.
In most Indo-European faiths, such as Buddhism, you reach enlightenment by being a good person (faith in Buddha, or Krishna, or Woden isn't necessary); but all souls will reach enlightenment in the end, unlike Christianity where the good will burn in hell if they don't believe. You see, in Christianity some souls reach bliss and some stay in a hell for an eternity.
when our whole "enlightenment" or goal as it were is on our ability to be "good" what happens when we fail? If all will reach "enlightenment" what insentive is there to even try? Why not do what we want, and then just die and find enlightenment then? You talk about how these other religions help you to be a better person yet you have not offered any way they do so, nor any help they might offer for you to acheive that goal. All I see in what you've said is that I can be as evil as I want to be and when I die, I'll be just like everyone else, at least as far as Indo-European faiths such as buddhism go. How do they spur you to live a good life? what motivation is there to be anything but what you feel like doing? In fact, one of the things that is stumping me is that most people object to christianity because of the "Godly" life that is commanded, you are complaining because that "Godly" life isn't commanded....I am getting really confused by what you think christianity says....
Actually his argument is sound. He says that all faiths provide no real tangible truth, this includes his own belief system and my own (Buddhism). He doesn't, and I have this on good authority, try to convert others and he doesn't claim that his faith has visible truths.
I do however find heathenism and Buddhism far more logical than Christianity because they primarily work on a system of balance (karma) and don't feature a ridiculous permanent hell; naraka and even hel for instance, serve a perpose; reforming ''offenders'' - what we call in the English legal system ''utilitarian'' - unlike the hell of Christianity which neither acts as a deterrent or as a utilitarian prison. It is illogical and unjustifiably cruel.
So then can we assume that your problem with christianity is that the balance between a heaven and a hell is a balance you are not willing to live with, but a balance between everything else is good, the yin and yang as it were of life, simply doesn't work in eternity, only on earth?