Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Mother jailed for refusing to have 4 year old son circumsized
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SuperCloud" data-source="post: 67536924" data-attributes="member: 357959"><p>Well whether or not so-called <em><strong>judicial activism </strong></em>is right or wrong, its a practice enthusiastically embraced when people on the political left view a certain contractual agreement as being immoral.</p><p></p><p>US judges practicing <em><strong>judicial activism</strong></em> have sided with <em><strong>impoverished Americans</strong></em> that willfully signed contractually binding agreements with rent-to-own furniture and electronics establishments. The judges in certain cases viewed the contractual arrangements with the interest rates as being predatory. The judges may have acted right. But assuming they did for grown Americans that were "financially ignorant" and therefore vulnerable, certainly a 4 year-old child can be viewed at least as vulnerable as grown adults, and therefore in need of the protection of some <em><strong>judicial activism</strong></em>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SuperCloud, post: 67536924, member: 357959"] Well whether or not so-called [I][B]judicial activism [/B][/I]is right or wrong, its a practice enthusiastically embraced when people on the political left view a certain contractual agreement as being immoral. US judges practicing [I][B]judicial activism[/B][/I] have sided with [I][B]impoverished Americans[/B][/I] that willfully signed contractually binding agreements with rent-to-own furniture and electronics establishments. The judges in certain cases viewed the contractual arrangements with the interest rates as being predatory. The judges may have acted right. But assuming they did for grown Americans that were "financially ignorant" and therefore vulnerable, certainly a 4 year-old child can be viewed at least as vulnerable as grown adults, and therefore in need of the protection of some [I][B]judicial activism[/B][/I]. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Mother jailed for refusing to have 4 year old son circumsized
Top
Bottom