Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Matter of Heaven
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Frumious Bandersnatch" data-source="post: 27585364" data-attributes="member: 7449"><p>Only in your INTERPRETATION. The other verses say stars and say nothing about angels. If he meant angels there why didn't he explicity say angels? When he talks about the moon and the sun and the stars in R 6 it is pretty clear that he is talking about heavenly bodies and not angels. </p><p> One could postulate that something could change in the future. However, we have data showing uniformity of process in the <em>past </em>extending well before you supposed split that you have been unable to deal with. Even your constantly morphing myth fails to explain the scientific data from astronomy and geology no matter how you twist and turn. Further you now admit that not everything in the Bible means exactly what it says. You have lost. Get over it. </p><p> Sorry. You did say reputed. </p><p> </p><p> No only those things that are patently ridiculous like stars falling to earth, a 6,000 year old universe, plants being created before the sun, rapid continent separation and most of the world's sedimentary geology forming in 1,600 years between creation and a global flood (or during of after in more standard YEC models) which left no evidence that it ever happened and of course all land life being descended from those who survived that flood on a big wooden boat that landed somewhere in the middle east. </p><p> It says that stars will fall and also be cast to to earth but you claim it doesn't mean that. Yes, it is ridiculous to say that actual physical stars will fall to earth. It is also ridiculous to say that the earth was actually physically divided in the time of Peleg. Either would end life on earth. You admit that one clear literal reading of the verses is ridiculous while claiming that another reading that is actually not as clear must be interpreted as rapid continent separation and vast changes in the laws of physics. You require this to sustain your literal interpretation of other verses but since some verses are symbolic and not literal there is no need to distort all of science to try, even though you fail, to make observations of the world's geology agree with an unecessary literal interpretation. </p><p> </p><p>The Frumious Bandersnatch</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Frumious Bandersnatch, post: 27585364, member: 7449"] Only in your INTERPRETATION. The other verses say stars and say nothing about angels. If he meant angels there why didn't he explicity say angels? When he talks about the moon and the sun and the stars in R 6 it is pretty clear that he is talking about heavenly bodies and not angels. One could postulate that something could change in the future. However, we have data showing uniformity of process in the [I]past [/I]extending well before you supposed split that you have been unable to deal with. Even your constantly morphing myth fails to explain the scientific data from astronomy and geology no matter how you twist and turn. Further you now admit that not everything in the Bible means exactly what it says. You have lost. Get over it. Sorry. You did say reputed. No only those things that are patently ridiculous like stars falling to earth, a 6,000 year old universe, plants being created before the sun, rapid continent separation and most of the world's sedimentary geology forming in 1,600 years between creation and a global flood (or during of after in more standard YEC models) which left no evidence that it ever happened and of course all land life being descended from those who survived that flood on a big wooden boat that landed somewhere in the middle east. It says that stars will fall and also be cast to to earth but you claim it doesn't mean that. Yes, it is ridiculous to say that actual physical stars will fall to earth. It is also ridiculous to say that the earth was actually physically divided in the time of Peleg. Either would end life on earth. You admit that one clear literal reading of the verses is ridiculous while claiming that another reading that is actually not as clear must be interpreted as rapid continent separation and vast changes in the laws of physics. You require this to sustain your literal interpretation of other verses but since some verses are symbolic and not literal there is no need to distort all of science to try, even though you fail, to make observations of the world's geology agree with an unecessary literal interpretation. The Frumious Bandersnatch [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Matter of Heaven
Top
Bottom