This question is regarding the story of the Levite's concubine in Judges 19.
Do Christians think the concubine deserved to be raped to death? Was she "asking for it" (as modern people might phrase it)? If so what did she do to 'deserve it' or how was she 'asking for it'?
This question is regarding the story of the Levite's concubine in Judges 19.
Do Christians think the concubine deserved to be raped to death? Was she "asking for it" (as modern people might phrase it)? If so what did she do to 'deserve it' or how was she 'asking for it'?
I do not believe that. I was only asking the questions. Is there a problem? If you do not wish to answer or don't know the answer that is fine. I do not see any issue/problem.
St. Worms2 answered from his perspective. I think the answer was well stated and supported.
Description is not prescription.
The Bible is full of described things which are horrid, ugly, and unbelievably wrong. But description is not prescription.
The Bible is not an instruction manual. But a collection of stories, letters, exhortations, songs, poems, wisdom sayings, etc. There are instructions in its pages, some only relevant for ancient Israel (the Torah), some universally relevant, "Love your neighbor"; but the Bible as a whole isn't a "book" of instruction; but rather an over-arching narrative of the story of God and God's people all (from a Christian perspective) culminating in Jesus Christ. And thus the Bible is first and foremost, for the Christian, always about Jesus. To read it any other way is, from an historically Christian perspective, to read it wrongly.
-CryptoLutheran
The Bible, being a collection of ancient texts in ancient languages, can be less than easy for a 21st Century English speaker to totally comprehend.
Part of my background was in the history of Rome (both the Republic and Empire). The Ancients often did not write like we do today. I am not saying what the Bible says in this particular story.
If you don't wish to answer the questions or cannot that is fine. I have no issue with it. My questions seemed to have made you defensive. Perhaps I am wrong since the internet is not always the best way/form of communicating. If I am wrong then I apologize.
It is not really any particular verse that motivated me to ask the questions.
It was the actions of some Christians I have had personal interaction with in the past. Some of which are my own family. Yes, I have had extremely negative interactions with Christians, both past and current.
I am trying to believe that those were the exception rather than the rule, that the actions of a few do not reflect the attitudes of the whole. Some days I am closer to to that than others.
It is not really any particular verse that motivated me to ask the questions. It was the actions of some Christians I have had personal interaction with in the past. Some of which are my own family. Yes, I have had extremely negative interactions with Christians, both past and current.
I am trying to believe that those were the exception rather than the rule, that the actions of a few do not reflect the attitudes of the whole. Some days I am closer to to that than others.
Anyway, thank you for your time and your response.
This question is regarding the story of the Levite's concubine in Judges 19.
Do Christians think the concubine deserved to be raped to death? Was she "asking for it" (as modern people might phrase it)? If so what did she do to 'deserve it' or how was she 'asking for it'?