Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Lambda-CDM: What good is their so called "research" program?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael" data-source="post: 69201254" data-attributes="member: 627"><p>In case you didn't notice, a lot of atheists post to Christianforums, and I've yet to see any of them get banned for dissing on EU/PC theory, or for supporting big bang theory. In terms of neutrality towards various cosmology theories, there isn't a more "neutral" forum on the internet.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No can do. Apparently <a href="http://cosmoquest.org/forum/showthread.php?30979-Suspended-banned-posters-log&p=654355#post654355" target="_blank">they burn their witches at the stake</a> and they limit "against the mainstream" conversations of this nature to 30 days tops. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite3" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't really feel like going through 8 months of threads looking for various predictions, but I A) predicted that a solid surface radiating at a lower temp could be located under the surface of the photosphere, and SAFIRE actually verified that possibility in actual laboratory measurements of the surface of their sphere compared to plasma in the atmosphere around the sphere. I also predicted that neon at the surface of the photosphere would be highly ionized. These are both unique predictions I made.</p><p></p><p>Birkeland however made a whole series of prediction related to solar physics, including the prediction of both types of high speed particles flowing from the sun, polar jets, cathode rays, and current in the Earth's aurora. All of them have been verified by satellites in space. There has never been a day when Birkeland's solar model did not make verifiable, and even *falsifiable* predictions. Compare and contrast that with your dark matter entity who failed to show up at LHC, LUX, PandaX and AMDx and who simply won't and can't die a "natural" empirical death. The dark dogma is apparently impervious to falsification.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030402608000089" target="_blank">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030402608000089</a></p><p></p><p>Sure. I'd be interested in duplicating Chen's work with current carrying plasma to see if we can verify his claim that photon redshift is related to free electrons in the plasma. I'd also be inclined to test various pressures and types of plasma to see what net effects we can achieve in real labs with real photon in real life "tests".</p><p></p><p>Compare and contrast that with your impotent on Earth "space expansion/acceleration" claims which have *never* had any tangible effect on a single photon on Earth, nor could it ever do so.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Er, why do you need any "meat" in the first place? Exactly what dark matter "meat" did you folks produce at LHC, LUX, PandaX or AMDx? What *exactly* does it take to falsify your invisible friends anyway? Care to be specific about any test that would actually falsify your claims about invisible cold dark matter?</p><p></p><p>All things considered, there isn't any empirical meat to any of your dark matter experiments or claims to be found in those millions of dollars you blew on dark matter. Why do you even care about experimentation when you don't care one iota about any negative results in the first place? Why aren't your negative and useless dark matter "tests" a measure of the value of your claim? Why the blatant double standard?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael, post: 69201254, member: 627"] In case you didn't notice, a lot of atheists post to Christianforums, and I've yet to see any of them get banned for dissing on EU/PC theory, or for supporting big bang theory. In terms of neutrality towards various cosmology theories, there isn't a more "neutral" forum on the internet. No can do. Apparently [URL='http://cosmoquest.org/forum/showthread.php?30979-Suspended-banned-posters-log&p=654355#post654355']they burn their witches at the stake[/URL] and they limit "against the mainstream" conversations of this nature to 30 days tops. :( I don't really feel like going through 8 months of threads looking for various predictions, but I A) predicted that a solid surface radiating at a lower temp could be located under the surface of the photosphere, and SAFIRE actually verified that possibility in actual laboratory measurements of the surface of their sphere compared to plasma in the atmosphere around the sphere. I also predicted that neon at the surface of the photosphere would be highly ionized. These are both unique predictions I made. Birkeland however made a whole series of prediction related to solar physics, including the prediction of both types of high speed particles flowing from the sun, polar jets, cathode rays, and current in the Earth's aurora. All of them have been verified by satellites in space. There has never been a day when Birkeland's solar model did not make verifiable, and even *falsifiable* predictions. Compare and contrast that with your dark matter entity who failed to show up at LHC, LUX, PandaX and AMDx and who simply won't and can't die a "natural" empirical death. The dark dogma is apparently impervious to falsification. [URL]http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030402608000089[/URL] Sure. I'd be interested in duplicating Chen's work with current carrying plasma to see if we can verify his claim that photon redshift is related to free electrons in the plasma. I'd also be inclined to test various pressures and types of plasma to see what net effects we can achieve in real labs with real photon in real life "tests". Compare and contrast that with your impotent on Earth "space expansion/acceleration" claims which have *never* had any tangible effect on a single photon on Earth, nor could it ever do so. Er, why do you need any "meat" in the first place? Exactly what dark matter "meat" did you folks produce at LHC, LUX, PandaX or AMDx? What *exactly* does it take to falsify your invisible friends anyway? Care to be specific about any test that would actually falsify your claims about invisible cold dark matter? All things considered, there isn't any empirical meat to any of your dark matter experiments or claims to be found in those millions of dollars you blew on dark matter. Why do you even care about experimentation when you don't care one iota about any negative results in the first place? Why aren't your negative and useless dark matter "tests" a measure of the value of your claim? Why the blatant double standard? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Lambda-CDM: What good is their so called "research" program?
Top
Bottom