Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Lambda-CDM: What good is their so called "research" program?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael" data-source="post: 69189604" data-attributes="member: 627"><p>Ya, it typically takes more than five minutes to really understand just about any cosmology theory. Unfortunately in this case it probably takes years to fully read through Birkeland's work, Alfven's work, Peratt's work, Lerner's work, and a few textbooks on MHD theory, and only then might you hope to have some concept of a circuit oriented plasma cosmology theory. I doubt most of them even understand circuit theory, and few if any of the EU/PC haters on the internet have ever read a textbook on MHD theory. </p><p></p><p>Meanwhile they simply ignore all the failures in the lab at LHC, at LUX, PandaX, AMDx, electron roundness tests, etc, and they ignore the fact that their so called "standard candles" turned out to be less than standard. They ignore the fact that they utterly and completely botched the stellar mass estimates in that dark matter lensing study in 2006 by a whopping factor of between 3 and 20, and they underestimated the number of stars between galaxies, and the plasma around galaxies as well.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=15850" target="_blank">http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=15850</a></p><p></p><p>The mainstream has the worst case of confirmation bias in the history of physics, and they aren't willing to invest even 10 minutes of time trying to approach spacetime from the perspective of empirical physics even when it works in the lab and they can see it working with their own eyes. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite3" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael, post: 69189604, member: 627"] Ya, it typically takes more than five minutes to really understand just about any cosmology theory. Unfortunately in this case it probably takes years to fully read through Birkeland's work, Alfven's work, Peratt's work, Lerner's work, and a few textbooks on MHD theory, and only then might you hope to have some concept of a circuit oriented plasma cosmology theory. I doubt most of them even understand circuit theory, and few if any of the EU/PC haters on the internet have ever read a textbook on MHD theory. Meanwhile they simply ignore all the failures in the lab at LHC, at LUX, PandaX, AMDx, electron roundness tests, etc, and they ignore the fact that their so called "standard candles" turned out to be less than standard. They ignore the fact that they utterly and completely botched the stellar mass estimates in that dark matter lensing study in 2006 by a whopping factor of between 3 and 20, and they underestimated the number of stars between galaxies, and the plasma around galaxies as well. [URL]http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=15850[/URL] The mainstream has the worst case of confirmation bias in the history of physics, and they aren't willing to invest even 10 minutes of time trying to approach spacetime from the perspective of empirical physics even when it works in the lab and they can see it working with their own eyes. :( [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Lambda-CDM: What good is their so called "research" program?
Top
Bottom