Most of Main Stream Christianity Clergy have no idea what they are on about...especially the Pope.
Thanks for the answers. So it seems unanimous that the Church can more fully understand a teaching of Scripture over time. Correct?
'Cryptic' means 'embarrassing', does it?Posts 6 & 7 are so cryptic I know not how to respond.
Why does this remind me of some people who called someone else a glutton and drunkard?It's questionable how far the vast majority of those calling themselves Christians, who obviously aren't Christians, realise the fate they are headed for. They'd be much better off being simple hedonists, in this life and the next.
It is easily comprehensible, then.Why does this remind me of some people who called someone else a glutton and drunkard?
Posts 6 & 7 are so cryptic I know not how to respond.
A great irony was the Roman church
I'm asking if people believe the Church's understanding of Scripture can develop over time. If there's anyone else out there with a take on this, please provide. Thanks!
Lots of religious people have come across quite authoritative and confident when they are talking about various parts of Scripture. But the truth is, for the most part, what everyone is doing is just interpreting the Scripture to whatever fits their own understanding.
So people might say they understand a lot of the Scripture, but you pull together different religious groups, their understandings will differ because their interpretations are different. And who is to say who has the correct understanding and interpretation of Scripture?
As the saying goes: "You can be sincere about your convictions, but you could be sincerely wrong."