Innocent Children of Guilty Parents
I do not like Pacifists, Socialists, Atheists and Extreme Environmentalists because they do more harm than good. I believe Liberal Christians, Atheists and democrats are good at hope propaganda but not the truth of reality. I believe the hope concepts avoid the tough love programs that could really work. Even if the tough love programs did not work, they are better than Socialism that requires stealing from most to give to the few.
The Bible has the following to say about the Innocent Children of Guilty Parents as part of the Ten Commandments.
TEN COMMANDMENTS Exodus 20:36;
3 Thou shalt have no other gods before me. 4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: 5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; 6 And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.
The concept of innocent children is often used by Pacifists, Socialists and Atheists to advocate their evil activities.
SOCIALISTS use the concept of innocent children to create massive socialist educational programs to give money to disadvantaged children. The Socialist would say they are helping the disadvantaged children, but in most cases they are just wasting money on children with low potential for success.
There is very low potential of helping a child during the 6 hours they are in a school, when the child had to go back into 18 hours of parents that set a very low lifestyle example.
A better way to deal with this situation is to get rid of guilty parents. America needs to have an Absolute Paternity Law that say parents must provide for their children. Failure to provide for their children (as proved by asking for government assistance) should be punishable by death using the three strikes and you are out concept.
No health care/welfare or any other Socialistic Program should be available to any child that has a living father. The Bible has the following to say about men that father children and fail to provide for their children.
I Timothy 5:8 states, "But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel."
PACIFISTS use the concept of innocent children to make war look like an atrocity instead of eliminating an enemy that threatens your existence.
There are two ways to fight a war.
In the short war concept you rapidly eliminate the enemy, thus ending the war quickly. This means you maximize the casualties of the enemy and minimize your own casualties. If there is a shot from a house, you destroy the house and move on. The short war concept give the advantage to those that are trying to eliminate the enemy.
In the long war concept you act carefully to try avoid casualties of the enemy. This means you expose your own people to greater danger while you try to determine whether a person is a non combatant enemy or a combatant enemy. The long war concept give the advantage to the enemy.
Pacifists would make great distinction between non combatant enemy and combatant enemy. The military needs to keep a lot of reporters with them to send up to a house where there has enemy fire and let the reporters determine which are non combatants enemy and which are combatant enemy. When the reports don't come back, the military can proceed to destroy the house since there must be only combatant enemy there.
Judy Woodruff of the PBS Newshour cannot present a Middle East War story without bring up "the problem of civilian causalities". I believe the appropriate statement about Judy Woodruff and most Pacifists would be, "an useful idiot that aids the enemy"
The time to discuss Pacifism is before the war and not during he war. After the war has been declared Pacifists need to keep quite or risk being charged with being a traitor and sent to Guantanamo and face a military trial for treason (aiding the enemy).
Another person abusing the concept of innocence is Afghan President Hamid Karzai. I believe Karzai is just like Arafat that play both sides against each other to enrich himself and his cronies. I would hope the American policy would be to provide only military protection and financial aid to the rural areas so that a ground up democracy could take hold instead of a continuing top down corruption. An election (as in a democracy) does not insure good government, when there are no good people running for office. It may take many years for good people to learn how to use democracy.
The best way to do something good for innocent children is to deal with the guilty parents. It is sort of ironic that the Liberal Christians, Atheists and democrats that worry about innocent children usually are the same ones that support abortion.
I do not like Pacifists, Socialists, Atheists and Extreme Environmentalists because they do more harm than good. I believe Liberal Christians, Atheists and democrats are good at hope propaganda but not the truth of reality. I believe the hope concepts avoid the tough love programs that could really work. Even if the tough love programs did not work, they are better than Socialism that requires stealing from most to give to the few.
The Bible has the following to say about the Innocent Children of Guilty Parents as part of the Ten Commandments.
TEN COMMANDMENTS Exodus 20:36;
3 Thou shalt have no other gods before me. 4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: 5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me; 6 And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.
The concept of innocent children is often used by Pacifists, Socialists and Atheists to advocate their evil activities.
SOCIALISTS use the concept of innocent children to create massive socialist educational programs to give money to disadvantaged children. The Socialist would say they are helping the disadvantaged children, but in most cases they are just wasting money on children with low potential for success.
There is very low potential of helping a child during the 6 hours they are in a school, when the child had to go back into 18 hours of parents that set a very low lifestyle example.
A better way to deal with this situation is to get rid of guilty parents. America needs to have an Absolute Paternity Law that say parents must provide for their children. Failure to provide for their children (as proved by asking for government assistance) should be punishable by death using the three strikes and you are out concept.
No health care/welfare or any other Socialistic Program should be available to any child that has a living father. The Bible has the following to say about men that father children and fail to provide for their children.
I Timothy 5:8 states, "But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel."
PACIFISTS use the concept of innocent children to make war look like an atrocity instead of eliminating an enemy that threatens your existence.
There are two ways to fight a war.
In the short war concept you rapidly eliminate the enemy, thus ending the war quickly. This means you maximize the casualties of the enemy and minimize your own casualties. If there is a shot from a house, you destroy the house and move on. The short war concept give the advantage to those that are trying to eliminate the enemy.
In the long war concept you act carefully to try avoid casualties of the enemy. This means you expose your own people to greater danger while you try to determine whether a person is a non combatant enemy or a combatant enemy. The long war concept give the advantage to the enemy.
Pacifists would make great distinction between non combatant enemy and combatant enemy. The military needs to keep a lot of reporters with them to send up to a house where there has enemy fire and let the reporters determine which are non combatants enemy and which are combatant enemy. When the reports don't come back, the military can proceed to destroy the house since there must be only combatant enemy there.
Judy Woodruff of the PBS Newshour cannot present a Middle East War story without bring up "the problem of civilian causalities". I believe the appropriate statement about Judy Woodruff and most Pacifists would be, "an useful idiot that aids the enemy"
The time to discuss Pacifism is before the war and not during he war. After the war has been declared Pacifists need to keep quite or risk being charged with being a traitor and sent to Guantanamo and face a military trial for treason (aiding the enemy).
Another person abusing the concept of innocence is Afghan President Hamid Karzai. I believe Karzai is just like Arafat that play both sides against each other to enrich himself and his cronies. I would hope the American policy would be to provide only military protection and financial aid to the rural areas so that a ground up democracy could take hold instead of a continuing top down corruption. An election (as in a democracy) does not insure good government, when there are no good people running for office. It may take many years for good people to learn how to use democracy.
The best way to do something good for innocent children is to deal with the guilty parents. It is sort of ironic that the Liberal Christians, Atheists and democrats that worry about innocent children usually are the same ones that support abortion.