Inconsistency of Statements of Purpose

[St_Worm2]

Greetings: I found we have two different Statements of Purpose regarding the freedom to make Non-Trinitarian posts in Controversial Theology. Would it be possible to update GT's Statement of Purpose to align with CT's newer one? Thanks! --David

1) Controversial Theology's 2015 Statement of Purpose says:

Non-Nicene unorthodox Christian topics may only be discussed in the Controversial Christian Theology forum. Non-Trinitarianism may only be discussed in the Christianity & World Religion forum and the Debate Non-Christian Religions forum. The non-Nicene, unorthodox Christian topics which may discussed in this forum include (but are not limited to):

• Universalism
• Open Theism
• Full Preterism
• Annihilationism
• Gnosticism

2) General Theology's 2013 Statement of Purpose says:

"Discussions in all "Christians Only" forums must be in alignment with Nicene and Trinitarian beliefs. Christian non-Nicene and non-Trinitarian topics may only be discussed in the Controversial Theology forum. The Controversial Theology forum is open to Christian members only (faith groups list). These unorthodox topics include (but are not limited to):

• Universalism
• Open Theism
• Full Preterism
• Non-Trinitarianism
• Annihilations
• Gnosticism

 

[David4223]

@Kristen.NewCreation @Sojourner1

 

[Kristen.NewCreation]

Thanks. Will look into this.

 

[St_Worm2]

Thank you