- Oct 31, 2008
- 20,428
- 12,116
- 37
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Is it possible that the rejection of any labels or classification by some groups of Christianity is really just a repackaging of the "non-conformity" trend in post-modern Christianity?
For example, I remember identifying myself as a non-denominational Christian for a season, and how invigorating it felt to announce it (in some cases in appropriate situations, in other cases not so much) but for me the rush came from feeling like I was in rebelling against the norm in a self-righteous way. I look back on that understanding that for me personally, I had an ax to grind other established traditions and so I refused to conform to them by choosing non-denominationalism.
So what are you thoughts? Is this Christian non-conformity at work? This isn't something exclusive to non-denominationalism, but in some cases all labels are rejected without exception.
For example, I remember identifying myself as a non-denominational Christian for a season, and how invigorating it felt to announce it (in some cases in appropriate situations, in other cases not so much) but for me the rush came from feeling like I was in rebelling against the norm in a self-righteous way. I look back on that understanding that for me personally, I had an ax to grind other established traditions and so I refused to conform to them by choosing non-denominationalism.
So what are you thoughts? Is this Christian non-conformity at work? This isn't something exclusive to non-denominationalism, but in some cases all labels are rejected without exception.