Dogheaded
Active Member
- Jun 17, 2023
- 107
- 49
- 29
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Single
What success? You are arriving at an apparent tautology.The assertion that the Ukrainians are struggling in a very difficult and overwhelming scenario is valid and 100% true.
However, the assertion in the article that somehow western training has not served the Ukrainians well and they are having to find other tactics- rather than western approaches is completely and totally bogus.
The success of Ukraine against Russia- in a clearly David and Goliath scenario- confirms beyond doubt that the combination of western training and western equipment with western leaning/receptive troops has been very powerful. The problem is not in the "western methods not working". The problem is that the Ukrainians do not have the equipment needed to carry out what the western approach would be if not constrained. The Americans and/or NATO would not spend a minute trying to clear a minefield without air support and would use long range missiles to take out Russia's air support and ammo depots well into Russia before it reached the front lines. Ukraine does it but is limited to Ukraine. Ukraine is not attempting other ,methods because western ones do not work. They are doing it cause they do not have air power and long range missiles to go with the methods. Subject to change.
Further, it should be noted, that the Russians have also been trying to carry out counteroffensives themselves in the areas they lost in winter, and have not gained an inch. And they are about to lose Bakmut before the month is over. So even though they have the overwhelming advantage in troop numbers, air power, artillery, they are making no progressive with counteroffense either. They are doing well on defense because they are dug in and heavily mined. And that is what it is and I don't try to pretty that up. But if Ukraine breaks through to the land bridge and then they dig in and set mines to defend the land that severs the land bridge while the Ukrainians take down the Crimea/Kersh Bridge, then they will be the ones with the problem.
Ask the Ukrainians what they want and they say they want air cover and long range missiles to do exactly what NATO would do, Not to abandon western training and approach but to carry it out. The west is sending in the newer tanks and has lost quite a few but the Americans/NATO would not even think of or train any Ukrainians to deploy tanks without air cover. As in any war, the militaries fight with what they are given to work with. This is true for both sides.
More to come. Subject to change from week to week. Ukraine is developing more and more home grown drones and long range missiles with each week that goes home. Let's just say,, they are not all as home grown as is represented but if they look like they were developed in Ukraine then it gets NATO off the hook. Similarly, as a colony of China now, Russia is importing supplies from China that they don't want to talk about in the light of day.
One of the countries has invaded a sovereign country as part of their war of choice. The other is a sovereign country fighting and defending their homeland. The one that is fighting a war of choice, should go home, and send a check for one trillion (Usd, not rubles) for a start on reparations.
Upvote
0