- Oct 2, 2011
- 3,516
- 791
- Country
- Canada
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Jeremiah 7:
It was not to be understood absolutely but relatively. New International Version:
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown explained:
But he did, right?21 Thus says the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel: “Add your burnt offerings to your sacrifices, and eat the flesh. 22 For in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt, I did not speak to your fathers or command them concerning burnt offerings and sacrifices.
This kind of negative speaking was an example of the Hebrew concept of limited negatives.23 But this command I gave them: ‘Obey my voice, and I will be your God, and you shall be my people. And walk in all the way that I command you, that it may be well with you.’
It was not to be understood absolutely but relatively. New International Version:
NIV added the word "just" to reflect this concept of negative comparative.For when I brought your ancestors out of Egypt and spoke to them, I did not just give them commands about burnt offerings and sacrifices,
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown explained:
Similarly, Matthew Poole's:The negative in Hebrew often supplies the want of the comparative: not excluding the thing denied, but only implying the prior claim of the thing set in opposition to it. "The mere sacrifice was not so much what I commanded, as the sincere submission to My will gives to the sacrifice all its virtue" [Magee, Atonement, Note 57].
As to the meaning of the words, God doth not condemn them, or deny them, save only comparatively in respect of obedience, not so much these as obeying his commands. Negatives are often put for comparatives, Genesis 45:8 Exodus 16:8 John 5:45. Hence the Hebrew is, the matter of burnt-offerings; for sacrifices were not instituted for themselves, but for other uses, and to be signs of faith in his promises, and obedience to his commands.