Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Outreach
Outreach
Exploring Christianity
Humanist in roles
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="lucaspa" data-source="post: 59776262" data-attributes="member: 4882"><p>It's good you are not going to get into it, because then you don't have to have your delusion exposed. But let me give you a homework assignment:</p><p> </p><p>Read this carefully:</p><p> </p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'">"The only distinct meaning of the word 'natural' is <em>stated, fixed, or settled</em>; since what is natural as much requires and presupposes an intelligent agent to render it so, i.e., to effect it continually or at stated times, as what is supernatural or miraculous does to effect it for once." Butler: Analogy of Revealed Religion.</span></p><p> </p><p>To be an atheist, you <strong>must believe</strong> that Butler is wrong, that what is "natural" does not require the supernatural. Right? So now, tell me how you prove that natural does not require the supernatural to work. Without that proof, isn't atheism a faith? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="lucaspa, post: 59776262, member: 4882"] It's good you are not going to get into it, because then you don't have to have your delusion exposed. But let me give you a homework assignment: Read this carefully: [FONT=Arial]"The only distinct meaning of the word 'natural' is [I]stated, fixed, or settled[/I]; since what is natural as much requires and presupposes an intelligent agent to render it so, i.e., to effect it continually or at stated times, as what is supernatural or miraculous does to effect it for once." Butler: Analogy of Revealed Religion.[/FONT] To be an atheist, you [B]must believe[/B] that Butler is wrong, that what is "natural" does not require the supernatural. Right? So now, tell me how you prove that natural does not require the supernatural to work. Without that proof, isn't atheism a faith? :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Outreach
Outreach
Exploring Christianity
Humanist in roles
Top
Bottom