- Oct 31, 2008
- 20,398
- 12,089
- 37
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
Those of you who know my story know that before I was Catholic I got married just after turning 22. Unfortunately the marriage didn't last and we divorced at 26. A couple years later while I was in RCIA I wanted to know what the Church said one way or another about the marriage's validity so I could best prepare for my life as a Catholic either as a celibate or as someone who could have another chance and seek out a Catholic wife. Turns out it was the latter case and the first marriage was invalid.
Anyway, I see a lot of discussions elsewhere about getting married young, sometimes the OP is for it and others they're against. I always prefer to advocate for young marriage because I think it's an objective good. I think the couple grows together better when they have an early start, and most importantly there's a reason our best child bearing years are in our late teens and early twenties. Secular society has wired itself against that by culturally encouraging people to prioritize college and careers first, which end up occupying the space of that same age range and supplanting our prime child bearing years.
The problem is, if I go into more depth about my own experiences while defending young marriage, it seems contradictory, paradoxical or just generally invalid. Because I don't regret getting married young, but the outcome of that marriage nevertheless makes people think that it disproves my point. I can objectively see all sorts of good that came out of that marriage, and separate that from what was wrong and what lead to its end. First and foremost, we weren't Catholic, and if we had been the foundational understanding of Holy Matrimony being a sacrament would surely have done a lot to change our perspective on the situation and also given us so many more resources to fix things.
I often find myself wishing I had met my wife 15 years ago so we could've gotten married when I was 18 and she was 21. Having married in our mid-thirties the possibility of having fewer kids stings, which was compounded by some complications she had from our sons birth last January. If we're lucky she'll be able to bear kids into her mid-forties like her mom did, but who knows now with one ovary.
Anyway, sorry for straying slightly OT but from your perspective does the fact that my young marriage ended in divorce discredit or disqualify me from advocating for young people to get married and starting families in their late teens and early twenties?
Anyway, I see a lot of discussions elsewhere about getting married young, sometimes the OP is for it and others they're against. I always prefer to advocate for young marriage because I think it's an objective good. I think the couple grows together better when they have an early start, and most importantly there's a reason our best child bearing years are in our late teens and early twenties. Secular society has wired itself against that by culturally encouraging people to prioritize college and careers first, which end up occupying the space of that same age range and supplanting our prime child bearing years.
The problem is, if I go into more depth about my own experiences while defending young marriage, it seems contradictory, paradoxical or just generally invalid. Because I don't regret getting married young, but the outcome of that marriage nevertheless makes people think that it disproves my point. I can objectively see all sorts of good that came out of that marriage, and separate that from what was wrong and what lead to its end. First and foremost, we weren't Catholic, and if we had been the foundational understanding of Holy Matrimony being a sacrament would surely have done a lot to change our perspective on the situation and also given us so many more resources to fix things.
I often find myself wishing I had met my wife 15 years ago so we could've gotten married when I was 18 and she was 21. Having married in our mid-thirties the possibility of having fewer kids stings, which was compounded by some complications she had from our sons birth last January. If we're lucky she'll be able to bear kids into her mid-forties like her mom did, but who knows now with one ovary.
Anyway, sorry for straying slightly OT but from your perspective does the fact that my young marriage ended in divorce discredit or disqualify me from advocating for young people to get married and starting families in their late teens and early twenties?