Horowitz: Whistleblowers share DOD medical data that blows vaccine safety debate wide open

[Bramblewild]

Link

In a declaration under penalty of perjury that Renz plans to use in federal court, Drs. Samuel Sigoloff, Peter Chambers, and Theresa Long — three military doctors — revealed that there has been a 300% increase in DMED codes registered for miscarriages in the military in 2021 over the five-year average. The five-year average was 1,499 codes for miscarriages per year. During the first 10 months of 2021, it was 4,182. As Renz explained to me in an interview with TheBlaze, these doctors queried the numbers for hundreds of codes from 2016 through 2020 to establish a baseline five-year average. These codes were generally for ailments and injuries that medical literature has established as being potential adverse effects of the vaccines.

...

Aside from the spike in miscarriage diagnoses (ICD code O03 for spontaneous abortions), there was an almost 300% increase in cancer diagnoses (from a five-year average of 38,700 per year to 114,645 in the first 11 months of 2021). There was also a 1,000% increase in diagnosis codes for neurological issues, which increased from a baseline average of 82,000 to 863,000!

Some other numbers he did not mention at the hearing but gave to me in the interview are the following:

• myocardial infarction –269% increase
• Bell’s palsy – 291% increase
• congenital malformations (for children of military personnel) – 156% increase
• female infertility – 471% increase
• pulmonary embolisms – 467% increase

...

The bottom line according to Renz is that the onus of proof is on the government, not on the military personnel and citizens being forced to take the shots. If the manufacturers are exempt from liability for government coercion to use their product, and the only pharmacological safety data we have is completely ignored, then where is the recourse of the people to redress safety concerns? In the opinion of the Ohio attorney, if the shots are safe and effective, then the Pentagon should have no problem explaining the source of these gargantuan increases in instances of numerous illnesses. Transparency is the most potent cure of a pandemic of secrecy.

 

[The Barbarian]

Fact Check: DOD Whistleblowers' 'Mind Blowing COVID Vaccine Injury Numbers' Were NOT Based On Accurate Data, Pentagon Says
Did Department of Defense (DOD) "whistleblowers" reveal what a headline claims were "mind-blowing COVID-19 vaccine injury numbers"? Yes, they did, but their figures were based on a comparison with what the Pentagon says were under-reported medical data from years preceding COVID-19 vaccines.
Fact Check: DOD Whistleblowers' 'Mind Blowing COVID Vaccine Injury Numbers' Were NOT Based On Accurate Data, Pentagon Says | Lead Stories

Which is something we've seen from anti-vaxxers before. So before we can determine who is lying, and who is telling the truth, we're going to have to look at that data and see how good it was. Since the data for civilian vaccinations don't show this effect, it's hard to see what about military life would make such a huge differenc.

I'm betting a chocolate chip cookie that when those old numbers are analyzed, they'll be found to be much lower then for civilians at the same period of time. Anyone want to take that bet?

 

[SkyWriting]

It wouldn't surprise me that exposure to vaccines would create adverse effects as high as 5 times greater.
The goal is to reduce the death rate. The death totals for Covid are 58 times as many deaths as the Flue.

It would be nice to reduce the other resulting effects as well. We could compare the Covid infection resulting maladies vs. vaccine maladies, and I would guess they are dramatically lower than the actual Virus, but that's just a guess.


But mostly we seek to not have 58 times {update - 217 times} as many Covid deaths as the common flu. We've been encouraging common Flue vaccines for 50 years now.

 

[disciple Clint]

Link

In a declaration under penalty of perjury that Renz plans to use in federal court, Drs. Samuel Sigoloff, Peter Chambers, and Theresa Long — three military doctors — revealed that there has been a 300% increase in DMED codes registered for miscarriages in the military in 2021 over the five-year average. The five-year average was 1,499 codes for miscarriages per year. During the first 10 months of 2021, it was 4,182. As Renz explained to me in an interview with TheBlaze, these doctors queried the numbers for hundreds of codes from 2016 through 2020 to establish a baseline five-year average. These codes were generally for ailments and injuries that medical literature has established as being potential adverse effects of the vaccines.

...

Aside from the spike in miscarriage diagnoses (ICD code O03 for spontaneous abortions), there was an almost 300% increase in cancer diagnoses (from a five-year average of 38,700 per year to 114,645 in the first 11 months of 2021). There was also a 1,000% increase in diagnosis codes for neurological issues, which increased from a baseline average of 82,000 to 863,000!

Some other numbers he did not mention at the hearing but gave to me in the interview are the following:

• myocardial infarction –269% increase
• Bell’s palsy – 291% increase
• congenital malformations (for children of military personnel) – 156% increase
• female infertility – 471% increase
• pulmonary embolisms – 467% increase

...

The bottom line according to Renz is that the onus of proof is on the government, not on the military personnel and citizens being forced to take the shots. If the manufacturers are exempt from liability for government coercion to use their product, and the only pharmacological safety data we have is completely ignored, then where is the recourse of the people to redress safety concerns? In the opinion of the Ohio attorney, if the shots are safe and effective, then the Pentagon should have no problem explaining the source of these gargantuan increases in instances of numerous illnesses. Transparency is the most potent cure of a pandemic of secrecy.

Bottom line: we just don't know what we don't know and as with most medications we likely will not know for years. Then we will hear the "we did not know at the time" excuse

 

[The Barbarian]

Bottom line: we just don't know what we don't know and as with most medications we likely will not know for years. Then we will hear the "we did not know at the time" excuse

Fortunately, we have data from other vaccines, which gives us considerable confidence, as does the test data. Life is always a crap shoot, but the fact that even with most Americans vaccinated, over 90% of COVID-19 patients in ICUs, are unvaccinated, makes it clear where the smart money is.

The real part we don't know, is how long the debilitating symptoms of "long haulers" will last. These people, some of whom had relatively mild infections, may have life-long consequences from the disease.

Mild or moderate COVID-19 lasts about two weeks for most people. But others experience lingering health problems even when they have recovered from the acute phase of the illness.


In such patients, there is no longer live coronavirus running amok in the body. If tested, the person would test negative for the coronavirus, but they might be severely debilitated nonetheless.


The problem has several names. The National Institutes of Health refer to long-term COVID-19 symptoms as PASC, which stands for post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2. More common terms are post-COVID syndrome, long COVID or long-term COVID. People living with post-COVID syndrome are sometimes known as “long haulers.”
...
According to the CDC, the most common lasting symptoms are fatigue, shortness of breath, cough, joint pain and chest pain. Other issues include cognitive problems, difficulty concentrating, depression, muscle pain, headache, rapid heartbeat and intermittent fever.

Breathing issues after COVID-19
...
Heart problems after COVID-19
...
Kidney damage from COVID-19
...
Lost or distorted senses of smell and taste after COVID-19
...
Neurologic Problems in Long COVID
...
Autonomic nervous system symptoms after COVID-19
...
Mental health issues after COVID-19
...
Diabetes after COVID-19
COVID ‘Long Haulers’: Long-Term Effects of COVID-19

 

[Bramblewild]

Fact Check: DOD Whistleblowers' 'Mind Blowing COVID Vaccine Injury Numbers' Were NOT Based On Accurate Data, Pentagon Says
Did Department of Defense (DOD) "whistleblowers" reveal what a headline claims were "mind-blowing COVID-19 vaccine injury numbers"? Yes, they did, but their figures were based on a comparison with what the Pentagon says were under-reported medical data from years preceding COVID-19 vaccines.
Fact Check: DOD Whistleblowers' 'Mind Blowing COVID Vaccine Injury Numbers' Were NOT Based On Accurate Data, Pentagon Says | Lead Stories

Which is something we've seen from anti-vaxxers before. So before we can determine who is lying, and who is telling the truth, we're going to have to look at that data and see how good it was. Since the data for civilian vaccinations don't show this effect, it's hard to see what about military life would make such a huge differenc.

I'm betting a chocolate chip cookie that when those old numbers are analyzed, they'll be found to be much lower then for civilians at the same period of time. Anyone want to take that bet?

Horowitz: Military spokesman claims 5 random years of DOD medical surveillance system were plagued by a giant glitch

Now, onto the substance of the claim. Here are some obvious problems with the statement of Mr. Graves:

1) We are to believe that somehow a data system that was designed to be monitored constantly was worthless and underreported for five years, but then magically reset to the proper baseline on its own in January 2021; however, the mistake of the previous five years was still not discovered until the whistleblowers came forward a year later?

2) There is nothing unique about the years 2016-2020. Those just happened to be the arbitrary years that the whistleblowers used to establish a baseline from which to compare the 2021 data. Why would this magic glitch affect only affect those years – not a year before and not a year after?

...

7) If every diagnosis from the previous five years only reported a “fraction” of ICD codes, then wouldn’t that be evident in every diagnosis, including ones that would conceivably have nothing to do with a vaccine injury? Instead, released data (posted here and verified by my source) confirms that the number of diagnoses for things like Lyme disease, tick-borne diseases, and Chagas – ailments we can safely theorize would not be affected by the vaccine – were not meaningfully higher in 2021 than the previous years. But if there was underreporting in the previous years, shouldn’t that be the case with every ICD code, not just the ones causing neurological, hematological, pulmonary, cardio, and reproductive disorders as well as cancers?

8) The diversity and magnitude of the individual numbers are too revealing to dismiss them as a glitch. If the vaccines were indeed the culprit, neurological disorders are exactly what one would expect to increase more than anything else. This harmonizes perfectly with Pfizer’s own cumulative post-authorization safety data reported to its system during the first few months of vaccination. In the 38-page document, obtained in a FOIA lawsuit by judicial ruling, Pfizer discloses the existence of 42,086 adverse event case reports containing 158,893 total events, including 1,227 deaths. The single largest category of serious injuries was classified as “Nervous system disorders.”

 

[The Barbarian]

The goal is to reduce the death rate. The death totals for Cold are 58 times as many deaths as the Flue.

Sounds interesting. Show us that. Checkable sources.

 

[SkyWriting]

Sounds interesting. Show us that. Checkable sources.

NVSS - Provisional Death Counts for COVID-19 - Executive Summary

 

[The Barbarian]

The single largest category of serious injuries was classified as “Nervous system disorders.”

No, that's wrong. Did you read the report? Six of the first seven most common reaction were mostly non-serious, (the fifth most common reaction was slightly more serious cases than nonserious). However, the data shows that many of these events were not shown to have been caused by the vaccine.

There have been hundreds of millions of doses given, with over 42,000 adverse events. So there's an adverse event in about one person for every 5000 people vaccinated, most of them not serious, and most of them not shown to be caused by the vaccination.

In 200,000,000 people, you'd expect a good number of them develop health issues without any vaccine at all. Which is what seems to have happened. If 0.02% (two-hundredths of one percent) have adverse effects, it presents a much lower risk of COVID death (in America about 0.3%.) And remember, the majority of these were not serious.

 

[The Barbarian]

NVSS - Provisional Death Counts for COVID-19 - Executive Summary

Pneumonia is a condition, not an infection. Influenza is the most common cause of viral pneumonia.

Now that we know we are in the midst of a flu epidemic, it is important to be aware of the risk of pneumonia. The flu virus is the most common cause of viral pneumonia in adults and many people can develop pneumonia as their weakened immune systems are fighting flu.
Flu is the most common cause of viral pneumonia in adults

 

[The Barbarian]

1) We are to believe that somehow a data system that was designed to be monitored constantly was worthless and underreported for five years, but then magically reset to the proper baseline on its own in January 2021; however, the mistake of the previous five years was still not discovered until the whistleblowers came forward a year later?

2) There is nothing unique about the years 2016-2020. Those just happened to be the arbitrary years that the whistleblowers used to establish a baseline from which to compare the 2021 data. Why would this magic glitch affect only affect those years – not a year before and not a year after?

It didn't. Did you not read the report? It's worth reading, even if it's not consistent with some of the stories they told you.

 

[chad kincham]

Fact Check: DOD Whistleblowers' 'Mind Blowing COVID Vaccine Injury Numbers' Were NOT Based On Accurate Data, Pentagon Says
Did Department of Defense (DOD) "whistleblowers" reveal what a headline claims were "mind-blowing COVID-19 vaccine injury numbers"? Yes, they did, but their figures were based on a comparison with what the Pentagon says were under-reported medical data from years preceding COVID-19 vaccines.
Fact Check: DOD Whistleblowers' 'Mind Blowing COVID Vaccine Injury Numbers' Were NOT Based On Accurate Data, Pentagon Says | Lead Stories

Which is something we've seen from anti-vaxxers before. So before we can determine who is lying, and who is telling the truth, we're going to have to look at that data and see how good it was. Since the data for civilian vaccinations don't show this effect, it's hard to see what about military life would make such a huge differenc.

I'm betting a chocolate chip cookie that when those old numbers are analyzed, they'll be found to be much lower then for civilians at the same period of time. Anyone want to take that bet?

As many people are pointing out, it’s ludicrous to claim the system was broken - and no one knew it for years - but magically fixed itself and reported accurate numbers this year.

This is just another spin to hide the truth, and fact checking has been biased

Fact Check: DOD Whistleblowers' 'Mind Blowing COVID Vaccine Injury Numbers' Were NOT Based On Accurate Data, Pentagon Says
Did Department of Defense (DOD) "whistleblowers" reveal what a headline claims were "mind-blowing COVID-19 vaccine injury numbers"? Yes, they did, but their figures were based on a comparison with what the Pentagon says were under-reported medical data from years preceding COVID-19 vaccines.
Fact Check: DOD Whistleblowers' 'Mind Blowing COVID Vaccine Injury Numbers' Were NOT Based On Accurate Data, Pentagon Says | Lead Stories

Which is something we've seen from anti-vaxxers before. So before we can determine who is lying, and who is telling the truth, we're going to have to look at that data and see how good it was. Since the data for civilian vaccinations don't show this effect, it's hard to see what about military life would make such a huge differenc.

I'm betting a chocolate chip cookie that when those old numbers are analyzed, they'll be found to be much lower then for civilians at the same period of time. Anyone want to take that bet?

As many are pointing out, they are claiming the system was broken for years - and no one knew it - but magically fixed itself this year.

That doesn’t pass the smell test - that’s covering up spin, that they are spouting.

As fae as fact checking- who’s checking the fact checkers, and who made them the final authority?

Fact is, the fact checkers bias has been revealed more than once - fact checking today is in fact an extension of fake news - this NY Post article is one example:

Fact-checking the fact-checkers: ‘Pants on Fire’ partisans

PS sorry about the double entry - the first one disappeared, so I did it again, only to show up when I posted.

 

[chad kincham]

Link

In a declaration under penalty of perjury that Renz plans to use in federal court, Drs. Samuel Sigoloff, Peter Chambers, and Theresa Long — three military doctors — revealed that there has been a 300% increase in DMED codes registered for miscarriages in the military in 2021 over the five-year average. The five-year average was 1,499 codes for miscarriages per year. During the first 10 months of 2021, it was 4,182. As Renz explained to me in an interview with TheBlaze, these doctors queried the numbers for hundreds of codes from 2016 through 2020 to establish a baseline five-year average. These codes were generally for ailments and injuries that medical literature has established as being potential adverse effects of the vaccines.

...

Aside from the spike in miscarriage diagnoses (ICD code O03 for spontaneous abortions), there was an almost 300% increase in cancer diagnoses (from a five-year average of 38,700 per year to 114,645 in the first 11 months of 2021). There was also a 1,000% increase in diagnosis codes for neurological issues, which increased from a baseline average of 82,000 to 863,000!

Some other numbers he did not mention at the hearing but gave to me in the interview are the following:

• myocardial infarction –269% increase
• Bell’s palsy – 291% increase
• congenital malformations (for children of military personnel) – 156% increase
• female infertility – 471% increase
• pulmonary embolisms – 467% increase

...

The bottom line according to Renz is that the onus of proof is on the government, not on the military personnel and citizens being forced to take the shots. If the manufacturers are exempt from liability for government coercion to use their product, and the only pharmacological safety data we have is completely ignored, then where is the recourse of the people to redress safety concerns? In the opinion of the Ohio attorney, if the shots are safe and effective, then the Pentagon should have no problem explaining the source of these gargantuan increases in instances of numerous illnesses. Transparency is the most potent cure of a pandemic of secrecy.

The truth is coming out from so many sources - it should hit critical mass before much longer, and no one will buy their lies - such as this Israeli mathematician:

ISRAELI MATHEMATICIAN SAYS VACCINATION CAUSING SURGE IN YOUTH DEATHS



In an August 2021 paper entitled “Young adult mortality in Israel during the COVID-19 crisis,”Dr. Ohana examined a surge in Israeli youth deaths which he says are unexplained by anything other than a surge in vaccinations for the age group 20-49. Israel is one of the most vaccinated countries in the world, and is heavily studied as a prime ‘test tube.’

In August Beckers Hospital Reviewreported that nearly 60% of hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Israel are fully vaccinated, contrary to US media reports claiming that it is overwhelmingly the “unvaccinated” who are getting COVID, which is anyway a 99.8% recovery ratevirus. As Anthony Fauci himself wrote in February of 2020 in the New England Journal of Medicine: “the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza.”

Dr. Steve Ohana concluded that his findings should “urgently prompt a pause in the vaccination campaign, until the reasons of the youth excess mortality observed in mass vaccination countries are clarified.”


Dr. Ohanu wrote:

“[The] unexpected rise in excess mortality among young adults was also found in two other countries, the United Kingdom and Hungary, which have in common with Israel a massive vaccination of their populations…”

“from the data put altogether, the only event that can plausibly account for the repeated highest rises in excess deaths both in February and March 2021 is the vaccination.”

Below: Steve Ohana, Economist/Mathematician, on Israeli i24 (program episode)



Possibly vaccine-caused deaths in the US reported to the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), are now over 16,000. The CDC admits, in a page on VAERS in general, that reported events are “only a small fraction of actual adverse events.”

The CDC says at its official website:

“VAERS receives reports for only a small fraction of actual adverse events. “

Dr. Ohana’s conclusions follow a year of hundreds, if not thousands, of doctors and scientists, none of whom are against all vaccinations, or “anti-vaxxers,” calling for a halt to the mass COVID injections. [Links to doctors’ calls for halts to mass “vaccinations,” partial list: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. ]

Source (also has more articles exposing the truth) :
Israeli Mathematician Says Vaccination Causing Surge in Youth Deaths

 

[chad kincham]

The death totals for Covid are 58 times as many deaths as the Flue.

Anthony Fauci himself wrote in February of 2020 in the New England Journal of Medicine: “the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza.”

 

[SkyWriting]

Anthony Fauci himself wrote in February of 2020 in the New England Journal of Medicine: “the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza.”

In that paragraph, he quoted other sources and proposed potential outcomes based on a spread of differing potential results. His examples resulted in projections
up to 4 million based on infection rates and morbidity.

On the basis of a case definition requiring a diagnosis of pneumonia, the currently reported case fatality rate is approximately 2%.4 In another article in the Journal, Guan et al.5 report mortality of 1.4% among 1099 patients with laboratory-confirmed Covid-19; these patients had a wide spectrum of disease severity. If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%. This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968)

rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively.2

- SARS resulted in at least 495 deaths worldwide.
- The 1968 flu pandemic resulted in an estimated one million to four million deaths.

 

[SkyWriting]

Pneumonia is a condition, not an infection. Influenza is the most common cause of viral pneumonia.

Now that we know we are in the midst of a flu epidemic, it is important to be aware of the risk of pneumonia. The flu virus is the most common cause of viral pneumonia in adults and many people can develop pneumonia as their weakened immune systems are fighting flu.
Flu is the most common cause of viral pneumonia in adults

So if those numbers are combined as you'd prefer they were, it's about a million dead a month for Flu
and a million dead a month for Covid.

That's why we've had Flu shots for 50 years now. And that's why we have a shortage of respirators. Because we suddenly need twice as many as normal for those who die, and an unknown number for the 98% who survive on respirators for a time.

 

[SkyWriting]

Sounds interesting. Show us that. Checkable sources.

But if you combine flu and pneumonia, then they are pulling close to the same roughly million per month as Covid.

 

[The Barbarian]

But if you combine flu and pneumonia, then they are pulling close to the same roughly million per month as Covid.

It's like adding dogs and animal noises together. Pneumonia can happen for a variety of things, including influenza and the common cold. It's not a viral infection, it's a symptom.

 

[The Barbarian]

So if those numbers are combined as you'd prefer they were, it's about a million dead a month for Flu
and a million dead a month for Covid.

That's why we've had Flu shots for 50 years now. And that's why we have a shortage of respirators. Because we suddenly need twice as many as normal for those who die, and an unknown number for the 98% who survive on respirators for a time.

No. There was no influenza outbreak in the U.S. this year. Some people still got influenza, but it turns out that masking and social distancing is even more effective against influenza than it is against COVID-19.

 

[SkyWriting]

No. There was no influenza outbreak in the U.S. this year. Some people still got influenza, but it turns out that masking and social distancing is even more effective against influenza than it is against COVID-19.

Those CDC numbers were for last month. Not the coming year.