I have a question for those who believe in hell as a place of eternal existance, awarness, and suffering in a Biblical imagery kind of way. How does that fit with your picture of God as i) loving, and ii) just.
Exactly, God is just, he cannot be in the presence of sin, so we, was sinners, cannot be in Heaven, but, Jesus died on the cross for our sins, to take the blame and to take our place. This was God's love, so that we, because of his love in sending Christ for us, could be in Heaven with him.little_tigress said:The Bible says:
23For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord. Romans 6:23
we as people deserve to die, because all of us are sinners. God proved that He is a loving God when He sent his Son to die for us and provide a way to avoid hell
Even in the OT a rule of justice was an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth. This was not suppose to be a way of making sure 'you get yours,' buta way of making sure the punishment did not exceed the crime. If in responce to someone stealing something, the law court in Britan punished him by putting out his eyes, locking him in stocks for 10 years and then hanging him there would be an up cry. We would acknowlage that that was not just on the basis that the punishment far out weighed the crime.Bizzlebin Imperatoris said:God provided plenty of ways out, and it sure is justice, considering you are still allowed to exist having sinned.
Pondering said:Even in the OT a rule of justice was an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth. This was not suppose to be a way of making sure 'you get yours,' buta way of making sure the punishment did not exceed the crime.
Then perhaps you don't see sin as being as bad as it is? If a just God has said the punishment for sin is eternal, maybe we can then say the crime is obviously worse than what we imagine.Pondering said:Even in the OT a rule of justice was an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth. This was not suppose to be a way of making sure 'you get yours,' buta way of making sure the punishment did not exceed the crime. If in responce to someone stealing something, the law court in Britan punished him by putting out his eyes, locking him in stocks for 10 years and then hanging him there would be an up cry. We would acknowlage that that was not just on the basis that the punishment far out weighed the crime.
For a brief and small length of time, the time of life which is like the grass that is here today and gone tomorrow the punishment is an eternal awarness of firey tourture (for e t e r n i t y), then the punishment is not equitable. It does not seem just.
I believe we are born with a tendancy to sin, but to blame your sin on the serpent, or the tree, or Adam and Eve isn't right. Have you lied recently? If so, did the devil make you do it? Did you have a choice not to, but felt Adam whispering in your ear? You are responsible for your sin, no one else. You have the power to prevent lying, you have the power not to steal. Ever take something that didn't belong to you, no matter how small? You have the power to stop. Now all will sin because we are bent on it, and we all choose to do it.It would seem less so if we consider that people are born with a sin nature, that sin nature means that it is not possible to do right all the time. I didn't put the serpent in the garden, nor the tree (although I accept both as being part of Gods plan). Christine, (sorry got personal) I mean someone, spends their life doing the best they can, but is certianly not perfect, the penality for something that they had no power to prevent, does not fit the crime.
Consider Justice. Does it seem just?
Doing away with Adam would have caused all the elect to never have been born- thus there would have been no slavation- which was not done for our sake, but rather that God be glorified.ceedaisy said:I do not understand the reason for hell in the first place. Why doesn't God just poof them into non existence? God has let Satan roam the earth in the first place. Why even mess with Humans? He could have done away with Adam and started over. He could have killed Satan long ago. This is what I don't get. Why all this pain in the first place?
I see your point, but you have to understand that it works both ways. As a christian i live a short while here on earth and my reward is eternity in heaven. Most people, even those who have no faith whatsoever, are willing to accept an eternity in heaven because of the "good" they have done in their short lives here on earth. However, if you explain to them same people that the opposite is also true and that hell is also eternal they have a hard time dealing with that. We have been given free will to choose whether we serve God or not. Hell for me is not so much about the degrees of punishment that exist there or the lake of fire etc... As terrible as those things are, hell for me is more about being seperated from God forever because of the decisions I made.Pondering said:For a brief and small length of time, the time of life which is like the grass that is here today and gone tomorrow the punishment is an eternal awarness of firey tourture (for e t e r n i t y), then the punishment is not equitable. It does not seem just.
Do a search in the OT on justice and judgement. Here's some:Pondering said:Even in the OT a rule of justice was an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth. This was not suppose to be a way of making sure 'you get yours,' buta way of making sure the punishment did not exceed the crime. If in responce to someone stealing something, the law court in Britan punished him by putting out his eyes, locking him in stocks for 10 years and then hanging him there would be an up cry. We would acknowlage that that was not just on the basis that the punishment far out weighed the crime.
For a brief and small length of time, the time of life which is like the grass that is here today and gone tomorrow the punishment is an eternal awarness of firey tourture (for e t e r n i t y), then the punishment is not equitable. It does not seem just.
It would seem less so if we consider that people are born with a sin nature, that sin nature means that it is not possible to do right all the time. I didn't put the serpent in the garden, nor the tree (although I accept both as being part of Gods plan). Christine, (sorry got personal) I mean someone, spends their life doing the best they can, but is certianly not perfect, the penality for something that they had no power to prevent, does not fit the crime.
Consider Justice. Does it seem just?
Since Jesus died on the cross for all of our sins, we all bear the guilt for his death.billwald said:What sort of punishment would be just for a crime committed against an Eternal Being?
God as a crime victim?
Pondering
Does it seem just?