This morning I posted a thread that clearly showed how people today are confusing ambiogenesis with evolution. In that thread, I said that university professors and teachers are teaching us that ambiogenesis and evolution are one in the same. But oh nooooooo, nobody believed me.
Could it be? Could evolution be a theory of origins? One Harvard Professor seems to think so.
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20050815/D8C095AG0.html
<snip>
CAMBRIDGE, Mass. (AP) - Harvard University is joining the long-running debate over the theory of evolution by launching a research project to study how life began. The team of researchers will receive $1 million in funding annually from Harvard over the next few years. The project begins with an admission that some mysteries about life's origins cannot be explained. The "Origins of Life in the Universe Initiative" is still in its early stages...
<snip>
So which is it, people? Is evolution a theory of origins or not? Should I believe YOU or should I believe this Harvard professor of chemistry and chemical biology?? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...
Maybe I'll just open my Bible to the Book of Genesis. Indeed it is far more trustworthy, stable, and free from the confusion that seems to dominate the theory of evolution, which apparently DOES include origins.