what does inappropriate behavior with animals have to do with gay rights, first of all.
Marriage is between one man and one woman so inappropriate behavior with animals has everything to do with gay rights. The gay lifestyle is an "
alternative" lifestyle.
The only question you need to ask yourself is exactly what is it alternative to. It's alternative to a "natural" or "normal" lifestyle and because the gay lifestyle is so un-natural and abnormal when compared to the natural and normal lifestyle those who practice it are forced to use terms like "diversity" and so on.
To be more pointed there was, in Washington, a "horse ranch" that catered to gay people. The media interviewed many of these people who participated in zoo sex (that's what they called it) and found that many of the people who thought they were gay were more drawn to have sex with animals then they had been drawn to have sex with other men (same with the wemon). There was an actual loby group that attempted to prevent WA State from making inappropriate behavior with animals against the law and the argument they had was that inappropriate behavior with animals was an "alternative lifestyle". David Letterman and Jay Leno were making fun of that when it was going. Trust me, if State Law continues to support same sex buggery some idiot in wearing clerics will marry a man to a sheep or a woman to a dog so I say we just drive these abnormal and un-natural lifestyles back into the closet where they belong.
diverse said:
very different or distinct
In otherwords, if the vast majority of people throughout the history of the world believed that marriage was between a man and a woman and the NORMAL lifestyle of humans is that a man and woman come together and start a family and for the most part STAY TOGETHER then this is a lifestyle. Something that "differs" from this majority lifestyle is DIVERSE, un-natural or ABNORMAL compared to the natural order of things and since it's not people we are talking about here (it's the lifestyle choice of the people NOT the people) alternative must be compared to what's natural. Because inappropriate behavior with animals is also a lifestyle that is divergent from the normal lifestyle who are you or anyone to say that beast rights should not be granted if both parties like it and the person is "drawn to it".
Kissme said:
Second of all, where is this Natural Law you speak of? I need to see proof.
And just because the majority of people think it's odd or unnatural doesn't mean it's evil or wrong. The majority of people don't like anchovies...does that mean that those who do are evil?
A) Cain killing able and attempting to "lie about it". That's about as clear of an example right out of the gate I can think.
B) People don't "hide" and generally are not embarassed to eat anchovies (people who eat them don't eat them in the closet) so we can reject that logic with ease.
Kissme said:
I go back to what my mother always said ..."if everyone else jumped off a bridge, would you do it too?".
Is it normal or natural for people to jump off a cliff or bridge? People kill themselves but it's understood that when people do this they are, at that time, mentally ill.
