Yes guys, and I don't even feel bad about it - there's not enough of me to go around in a timely manner. But I've got another minute, so let me see what I can do...
Tomk80, you seem to be missing my point that the problem is not merely with a single karyotype, but with the
proportion of reproductively compatible vs. reproductively
incompatible karyotypes amongst
"nearest relatives" in the animal kingdom as a whole.
- Woolly mammoths have 2n=58 chromosomes, elephants have 2n=56; hence, the major speciation event had to be karyotypic in nature
Horses have 2n=64, donkeys have 2n=62; hence, the major speciation event had to be karyotypic in nature
-
Equus prezwalski Mongolian wild horse 66
Equus caballus Domestic horse 56
Equus hemionus Mongolian wild ass 56
Equus kiang Tibetan wild ass
Equus onager Persian wild ass 56
Equus asinus Donkey or domestic ass 62
Equus zebra Zebra of Cape Colony 32
Equus grevyi Somililand zebra 46
Equus burchelli African zebra 44
All from
Genetics of the Horse Second Edition by William E. Jones DVM, Ph.D & Ralph Bogart Ph.D © 1971 Caballus Publishers, Box 2307, Fort Collins, CO 80521, as referenced on
http://www.nilemuse.com/ZebraFAQ/, and the major speciation events
had to be karyotypic in nature
-
chromosomes 4 and 17 are different between humans, chimps, gorillas, and orangutan
from
http://www.gate.net/~rwms/hum_ape_chrom.html, and the major speciation event
had to be chromosomal in nature.
If evolution is the result of acccumulated morphological changes, only a very small minority, if any, of nearest relatives would show visibly different karyotypes.
Evolutionist double-speak. For the majority of the 20th century, Evolution was taught as the accumulation of morphological changes. Sure, these traits are genetically based and inheritable, but nonetheless they are morphological in their manifestation. Students are taught that these variations for the most part are subtle and gradual, and the DNA changes they are indicative of are subtle as well. But I'm saying that the evidence tells us that most speciations of Evolution were
not accomplished by accumulations of numerous subtle DNA changes.