Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Evolutionary debate
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hespera" data-source="post: 54652370" data-attributes="member: 236382"><p>it is certainly possible to compare the sequence to other places. Whatever "non involved" is supposed to mean.</p><p></p><p>But its far from the whole story.</p><p></p><p>You can count back from the surface to 79 AD, and there is the ash from Vesuvias, there is the spike in the sulfuric acid content. </p><p></p><p>They can do C14 on the pollen and dust, and on the CO2 trapped in the ice.</p><p></p><p>Dates match with the e-log from the annual variations from the sulfuric acid, dates match to visual counting.</p><p></p><p>the years march right on thru any biblical "flood" date, and keep on going for tens of thousands of years. At 70 some thousand, here is the ash and acid from Toba <a href="http://www.bradshawfoundation.com/stanley_ambrose.php" target="_blank">Mount Toba : Late Pleistocene human population bottlenecks, volcanic winter, and differentiation of modern humans</a></p><p></p><p>and of course, human genetics also indicate a drastic population bottleneck at about that time.</p><p></p><p>Of course, the theocreos can and do make up all sorts of nonsense to try to explain this away. I didnt yet see how they would explain the ice not floating away if it were underwater... unless you count the one where layers right after the "flood" were made much faster than they are not.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hespera, post: 54652370, member: 236382"] it is certainly possible to compare the sequence to other places. Whatever "non involved" is supposed to mean. But its far from the whole story. You can count back from the surface to 79 AD, and there is the ash from Vesuvias, there is the spike in the sulfuric acid content. They can do C14 on the pollen and dust, and on the CO2 trapped in the ice. Dates match with the e-log from the annual variations from the sulfuric acid, dates match to visual counting. the years march right on thru any biblical "flood" date, and keep on going for tens of thousands of years. At 70 some thousand, here is the ash and acid from Toba [url=http://www.bradshawfoundation.com/stanley_ambrose.php]Mount Toba : Late Pleistocene human population bottlenecks, volcanic winter, and differentiation of modern humans[/url] and of course, human genetics also indicate a drastic population bottleneck at about that time. Of course, the theocreos can and do make up all sorts of nonsense to try to explain this away. I didnt yet see how they would explain the ice not floating away if it were underwater... unless you count the one where layers right after the "flood" were made much faster than they are not. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Evolutionary debate
Top
Bottom