Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Evolutionary debate
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="laconicstudent" data-source="post: 54244532" data-attributes="member: 250283"><p>1. Yes he has. You can look everything up in his papers. He made even more information available on his website.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It hasn't. That is simply untrue.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The only one's who questioned it were Conservapedia, who made themselves the laughing stock of the scientific community and Western society at large by demanding that Lenski send them bacterial specimens and demonstrating that they had not the faintest clue how to read a scientific study. </p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Was it written by a microbiologist, or anyone with a PhD in the sciences? No? Then I really can't be bothered.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually, it isn't.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And yet, he has exceeded all ethical standards by going and posting even more information about his methods on his website, and making his study <strong>free</strong> for everyone to download from the PNAS, just to prove his integrity. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Really? I wasn't aware that the PNAS had published anything of the sort. Citation please.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sorry, but he actually did</p><p></p><p><a href="http://myxo.css.msu.edu/ecoli/" target="_blank">E. coli Long-term Experimental Evolution Project Site</a></p><p></p><p><img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/old/kawaii.gif" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt="^_^" title="Kawaii ^_^" data-shortname="^_^" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="laconicstudent, post: 54244532, member: 250283"] 1. Yes he has. You can look everything up in his papers. He made even more information available on his website. It hasn't. That is simply untrue. The only one's who questioned it were Conservapedia, who made themselves the laughing stock of the scientific community and Western society at large by demanding that Lenski send them bacterial specimens and demonstrating that they had not the faintest clue how to read a scientific study. Was it written by a microbiologist, or anyone with a PhD in the sciences? No? Then I really can't be bothered. Actually, it isn't. And yet, he has exceeded all ethical standards by going and posting even more information about his methods on his website, and making his study [B]free[/B] for everyone to download from the PNAS, just to prove his integrity. Really? I wasn't aware that the PNAS had published anything of the sort. Citation please. Sorry, but he actually did [url=http://myxo.css.msu.edu/ecoli/]E. coli Long-term Experimental Evolution Project Site[/url] ^_^ [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Evolutionary debate
Top
Bottom