Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Evolution is not evidenced simply by similarity
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="In situ" data-source="post: 69544013" data-attributes="member: 331194"><p>You cannot say there is no reason for a nested set to exist if life was created. There exists reasons, for instance, if the nested set is created by a god like creature then it might implies this creature is deceptive. However, this is contrary to what people (in the western world) believe about the creator so it is not counted as a viable suggestion, but still it is a possible reason. Another reason might be a coincident, but that is so insane redicoulse unlikely to be the case so we can safely say that is most likely not the case. I am sure there might be other reason but I cannot be bother to conjure any up, I leave that to the creationists to do.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="In situ, post: 69544013, member: 331194"] You cannot say there is no reason for a nested set to exist if life was created. There exists reasons, for instance, if the nested set is created by a god like creature then it might implies this creature is deceptive. However, this is contrary to what people (in the western world) believe about the creator so it is not counted as a viable suggestion, but still it is a possible reason. Another reason might be a coincident, but that is so insane redicoulse unlikely to be the case so we can safely say that is most likely not the case. I am sure there might be other reason but I cannot be bother to conjure any up, I leave that to the creationists to do. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Evolution is not evidenced simply by similarity
Top
Bottom