Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Dilbert dropped as scott adams declares blacks to be a hate group.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="childeye 2" data-source="post: 77159210" data-attributes="member: 412375"><p>Exactly, and that is also what I meant but did not articulate accurately.</p><p></p><p>I'd say what is observed was a fact of reality (so long as it was observable phenomenon). Explaining what was observed is a different story and the interpretations do not necessarily qualify as fact.</p><p></p><p>I agree.</p><p></p><p>It's a property of linguistics that terms have positive, negative, and neutral connotations. I wasn't defining the term, I was alluding to how propaganda is created and works to shape thought and persuade people to a certain point of view.</p><p></p><p>I think his words come off as trying to explain himself, so I think he feels he could have chosen better words.</p><p></p><p>The question is do you agree or disagree with this statement? I agree the statement should have been phrased differently unless it was intentional for some purpose.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="childeye 2, post: 77159210, member: 412375"] Exactly, and that is also what I meant but did not articulate accurately. I'd say what is observed was a fact of reality (so long as it was observable phenomenon). Explaining what was observed is a different story and the interpretations do not necessarily qualify as fact. I agree. It's a property of linguistics that terms have positive, negative, and neutral connotations. I wasn't defining the term, I was alluding to how propaganda is created and works to shape thought and persuade people to a certain point of view. I think his words come off as trying to explain himself, so I think he feels he could have chosen better words. The question is do you agree or disagree with this statement? I agree the statement should have been phrased differently unless it was intentional for some purpose. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Dilbert dropped as scott adams declares blacks to be a hate group.
Top
Bottom