Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Darwinian Theator of the Mind: AKA Human Brain Evolution
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mark kennedy" data-source="post: 70371174" data-attributes="member: 29337"><p>Begging the question, you say that with absolutely no reference to the text.</p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p>Strawman, I never said Piltdown jeopardized the 'theory of evolution. I said, based on source material, it's one of the greatest scientific frauds of all time. Then I suggested that Taung and Lucy are chimpanzee ancestors. You haven't addressed anything substantive, your just confronting me with fallacious rhetoric. For a guy who refused to read the OP you seem to think a lot of your opinions regarding it.</p><p></p><p>What you should know about the Piltdown hoax is that it was the center piece of a bogus human family tree for half a century. There is a reason for that:</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">"Sir Arthur Keith, one of the leading proponents of Piltdown Man, was particularly instrumental in shaping Louis's thinking. "Sir Arthur Keith was very much Louis's father in science" noted Frida. Brilliant, yet modest and unassuming, Keith was regarded at the time of Piltdown's discovery as England's most eminent anatomist and an authority on human ancestry...a one man court of appeal for physical anthropologists from around the world....and his opinion that assured Piltdown a place on every drawing of humankinds family tree." (Ancestral Passions, Virginia Morell)</p><p></p><p></p><p>The universe is subordinate to the one who created it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mark kennedy, post: 70371174, member: 29337"] Begging the question, you say that with absolutely no reference to the text. Strawman, I never said Piltdown jeopardized the 'theory of evolution. I said, based on source material, it's one of the greatest scientific frauds of all time. Then I suggested that Taung and Lucy are chimpanzee ancestors. You haven't addressed anything substantive, your just confronting me with fallacious rhetoric. For a guy who refused to read the OP you seem to think a lot of your opinions regarding it. What you should know about the Piltdown hoax is that it was the center piece of a bogus human family tree for half a century. There is a reason for that: [INDENT]"Sir Arthur Keith, one of the leading proponents of Piltdown Man, was particularly instrumental in shaping Louis's thinking. "Sir Arthur Keith was very much Louis's father in science" noted Frida. Brilliant, yet modest and unassuming, Keith was regarded at the time of Piltdown's discovery as England's most eminent anatomist and an authority on human ancestry...a one man court of appeal for physical anthropologists from around the world....and his opinion that assured Piltdown a place on every drawing of humankinds family tree." (Ancestral Passions, Virginia Morell)[/INDENT] The universe is subordinate to the one who created it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Darwinian Theator of the Mind: AKA Human Brain Evolution
Top
Bottom