Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Creational Perception Ratio
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="46AND2" data-source="post: 70012795" data-attributes="member: 315032"><p>Polonium halos are better explained as radon halos, which is an inert gas that can migrate away from their uranium source. The decay energy of radon is nearly equal to that of polonium and therefore their halos are indistinguishable from each other. </p><p></p><p>Secondly, I already discussed why an accelerated decay cannot explain uranium halos. If you change the decay rate, you change the decay energy. If you change the decay energy, you change the distance the damage occurs in the mineral. The radius we observe in uranium halos is consistent with the decay energy we observe with uranium decay, which means it must have taken millions of years to create the halos and that the rate of that decay must have been constant over that time.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="46AND2, post: 70012795, member: 315032"] Polonium halos are better explained as radon halos, which is an inert gas that can migrate away from their uranium source. The decay energy of radon is nearly equal to that of polonium and therefore their halos are indistinguishable from each other. Secondly, I already discussed why an accelerated decay cannot explain uranium halos. If you change the decay rate, you change the decay energy. If you change the decay energy, you change the distance the damage occurs in the mineral. The radius we observe in uranium halos is consistent with the decay energy we observe with uranium decay, which means it must have taken millions of years to create the halos and that the rate of that decay must have been constant over that time. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Creational Perception Ratio
Top
Bottom