I didn't even read the thread, but he's merely a charlatan that is making money of off blind-paranoia. One particularly telling example (other than a multitude of false claims he's made over the years) was when he invited Noam Chomsky to the program to try and discuss 9/11 as a conspiracy, thinking that the very left-leaning Chomsky would be his natural ally...and once Chomsky disregarded it as nonsense, he waited until Chomsky had left the air, and then proceeded to denigrate him as another shill, and say things like, 'Shame on you, Chomsky'. For all of his accusations about dictatorships and the like, that's exactly what he wants to be...the final arbiter of truth, which is always the exact-opposite of the norm, and anyone who disagrees is just another stupid shill. It's so transparent that it should be considered nothing more than a comedy routine. I often wonder if he's trying to be the next Andy Kaufman.
