Care to explain how evolution isn't true?
The presumption that evolution is fact is one of the greatest contrived myths of our time. It has been repeated so long and often, many simply assume it is true. But,, the fact is evolution has become little more than a theology without a shred of real evidence
· Every proposed “ape-man” fossil has been discredited or exposed
as a fabrication or outright hoax. Not only is all demonstrable fossil evidence missing, so is any evidence of millions of transitional species.
· The “big bang, natural selection, survival of the fittest” and other ‘bolt-on accessories designed to prop-up evolution, have all failed to explain the reality of nature, scientific evidence and the lack of explanation for where the energy, light and other resources came from in the first place.
· Hundreds of credible scientists in all fields have publicly renounced Darwinism
· No statement or part of Scripture has ever been disproved
· All actual proof overwhelming supports the Bible and God’s creation
§ “Every creature reproduces after its own kind”
§ DNA/Chromosome evidence proves man is a separate species
§
Think about it for a moment. How many people who blindly claim the “incontrovertible evidence of evolution” really understand the science? Instead, they rely on sound bytes coming out of the evolutionary community – defending an indefensible position.
The illusion of evolution is that “time magically erases the barrier between nothing and something, and between rocks and living things.” Many still cling to the illusion that “time makes impossible things possible,” because they have ruled-out God, yet still need a plausible explanation for their own existence!
If you don’t believe me, here are just a few quotes from reputable, credible scientists who are not necessarily Christians:
Evolution is one of the greatest deceits in the history of Science
· “I believe that one day the Darwinian myth will be ranked the greatest deceit in the history of science”
Soren Lovtrup --Biologist, Scientist, ‘Treatise on Theoretical Biology’
·
Respectable scientists are defecting from the evolutionist camp
“A growing number of respectable scientists are defecting from the evolutionist camp ..Moreover, for the most part these ‘experts’ have abandoned Darwinism, not on the basis of religious faith or biblical persuasions, but on strictly scientific grounds, and in some instances, regretfully.”
Wolfgang Smith - Scientist at Bell Laboratories; Mathematics Professor at MIT, UCLA and Oregon State
·
Darwinist vigilantes disparage real science
“Darwinist vigilantes use the Internet to attack those they find guilty of promoting the heresy of intelligent design. They call themselves “howler monkeys.” Milton says, “The effects of the howler monkeys of the Internet are profoundly damaging to academic freedom of expression, whoever their current victim happens to be.”
Richard Milton --Geologist, Journalist and design engineer and a member of Mensa; (Claims to have no religious faith)
·
Lack of a fossil record contradicts verifiable Darwinian evolution
“If life progressed by an accumulation of small changes, as they say it has, the fossil record should reflect its flow, the dead stacked up in barely separated strata. But for well over 150 years, the dead have been remarkably diffident about confirming Darwin’s theory. Their bones lie suspended in the sands of time-theromorphs and therapsids and things that must have gibbered and then squeaked; but there are gaps in the graveyard, places where there should be intermediate forms but where there is nothing instead.”
David Berlinski -- Mathematician; Molecular Biologist; (Secular Jew)
·
“The improbability involved in generating even one bacterium is so large that it reduces all considerations of time and space to nothingness. Given such odds, the time until the black holes evaporate and the space to the ends of the universe would make no difference at all. If we were to wait, we would truly be waiting for a miracle”
Robert Shapiro—Harvard Phd; Professor Emeritus and Chemistry Research Scientist (NYU)
Even Charles Darwin pointed out the fallacy of presenting a fully developed human species with no evidence of any transitional forms.
"Why, if species have descended from other species by fine graduation, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms? Why is not all nature in confusion, instead of the species being, as we see them, well defined?" Charles Darwin, “
Origin Of The Species”:
· “
Darwin's strongest critics were scientists. The theologians who criticized him objected mainly to his philosophical insistence on natural causes and his denial of design--which Princeton's Charles Hodge regarded as ‘tantamount to atheism.’ Even today, many critics of Darwinism are not religious fundamentalists. An ever-growing number of critics are credentialed scientists”
Jonathan wells - The Problem of Evidence' - Forbes, Feb. 5, 2009 Molecular biologist, author and advocate of intelligent design