Biden continues his war on energy infrastructure with new broadside against US natural gas

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
8,348
3,111
Minnesota
✟215,106.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
For an administration inclined toward bad energy decisions, this one is hard to top. The pause on permits out of the U.S. Department of Energy risks preventing other countries from realizing the significant emissions reductions the United States has achieved from natural gas and could ultimately leave America’s allies in the dark.
But the president’s blatantly political decision in an election year fits a broader trend: This will make it harder for American companies to produce natural gas and oil. At nearly every turn in the past three years, the administration has erected regulatory barriers to oil and gas infrastructure improvement or creation.
Such decisions damage our environment and our country's economy.
 

Fantine

Dona Quixote
Site Supporter
Jun 11, 2005
37,139
13,203
✟1,091,281.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
While natural gas itself is clean, the fracking process used to extract it is problematic. Even Oklahoma banned fracking in part of the state because earthquakes had increased tenfold.
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
8,348
3,111
Minnesota
✟215,106.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
While natural gas itself is clean, the fracking process used to extract it is problematic. Even Oklahoma banned fracking in part of the state because earthquakes had increased tenfold.
Natural gas has been around a long time. Earthquakes are extremely rare and there are plenty of rules and regulations. Note the order was not just against natural gas from fracking but against all natural gas. My problem is that they orders are poorly thought out, with doing what is politically correct the main impetus.
 
Upvote 0

Fantine

Dona Quixote
Site Supporter
Jun 11, 2005
37,139
13,203
✟1,091,281.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Natural gas has been around a long time. Earthquakes are extremely rare and there are plenty of rules and regulations. Note the order was not just against natural gas from fracking but against all natural gas. My problem is that they orders are poorly thought out, with doing what is politically correct the main impetus.
Natural gas was easy to get, as was oil years ago. They are both finite resources, and the oil and gas we drill for today sometimes require extraordinary measures to obtain.
Several years ago an earthquake west of Tulsa, about 150 miles away, knocked a friend's house off its foundation, costing her $10k. She did not have earthquake insurance, and was never advised to get any--but this quake was the product of the OK fracking explosion, now heavily regulated.
Solar energy never knocked houses off their foundations.
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
8,348
3,111
Minnesota
✟215,106.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
24,823
13,408
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟368,230.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
Natural gas has been around a long time. Earthquakes are extremely rare and there are plenty of rules and regulations. Note the order was not just against natural gas from fracking but against all natural gas. My problem is that they orders are poorly thought out, with doing what is politically correct the main impetus.
Man, Republicans are such a weird breed. "Earthquakes IN THE MIDDLE OF THE CONTIENT should not be seen as a problem. There are building codes in place that should protect it.

Stop blaming EVERYTHING on being "politically correct". It's just not an apt description.
 
Upvote 0

durangodawood

Dis Member
Aug 28, 2007
23,606
15,761
Colorado
✟433,253.00
Country
United States
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
While natural gas itself is clean, the fracking process used to extract it is problematic. Even Oklahoma banned fracking in part of the state because earthquakes had increased tenfold.
I cant help thinking that we wont regret pressure injecting a who knows what chemical cocktail into the earth.

As for "normal" gas wells, even those and their pipeline systems have a pretty terrible record of leaking.
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
8,348
3,111
Minnesota
✟215,106.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Man, Republicans are such a weird breed. "Earthquakes IN THE MIDDLE OF THE CONTIENT should not be seen as a problem. There are building codes in place that should protect it.

Stop blaming EVERYTHING on being "politically correct". It's just not an apt description.
I'm sure not a Republican. It's not my fault that solar panels have caused more monetary damage than earthquakes from fracking. As to earthquakes in the middle of the continent there were some HUGE earthquakes down in the SE corner of Missouri before it was well populated, of much greater magnitude than any caused by fracking. Those occurred before fracking was invented.
 
Upvote 0

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
24,823
13,408
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟368,230.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
I'm sure not a Republican. It's not my fault that solar panels have caused more monetary damage than earthquakes from fracking.
And it's not my fault that Tommy Tuberville enjoys gokarting and taking sweet jumps over Mexicans he pays to lie down at the end of his jumps.

Writing stuff that's nonsense is super fun.


As to earthquakes in the middle of the continent there were some HUGE earthquakes down in the SE corner of Missouri before it was well populated, of much greater magnitude than any caused by fracking. Those occurred before fracking was invented.
What's your point? Honestly.
What happens in Missouri has NOTHING to do with the idea that FRACKING CAUSES EARTHQUAKES.
And no they were NOT huge. The biggest one was 4.6 and there were 4: 1990,2,8, and 2003


That's nothing. Oklahoma has had OVER A 1000 earthquakes in the last YEAR. In the last month they had two that were over 5.0
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
8,348
3,111
Minnesota
✟215,106.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
And no they were NOT huge. The biggest one was 4.6 and there were 4: 1990,2,8, and 2003


That's nothing. Oklahoma has had OVER A 1000 earthquakes in the last YEAR. In the last month they had two that were over 5.0
You're wrong again. Look up the New Madrid earthquakes.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

rambot

Senior Member
Apr 13, 2006
24,823
13,408
Up your nose....wid a rubbah hose.
✟368,230.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Greens
You're wrong again. Look up the New Madrid earthquakes.
Guy. It's not that you're wrong. It's that your information is useless and pointless.

That's 1811.
Why are you:
1) Even REFERRING to something that old?
2) Ignoring the current limp situation in Missouri now (4 in 30 years)?
3) Not even addressing that Oklahoma has 10000 earthquakes a year?
 
Upvote 0

Arcangl86

Newbie
Dec 29, 2013
11,165
7,524
✟347,449.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
For an administration inclined toward bad energy decisions, this one is hard to top. The pause on permits out of the U.S. Department of Energy risks preventing other countries from realizing the significant emissions reductions the United States has achieved from natural gas and could ultimately leave America’s allies in the dark.
But the president’s blatantly political decision in an election year fits a broader trend: This will make it harder for American companies to produce natural gas and oil. At nearly every turn in the past three years, the administration has erected regulatory barriers to oil and gas infrastructure improvement or creation.
Such decisions damage our environment and our country's economy.
Biden's order has nothing to do with the production of natural gas. It just puts a pause on building new export facilities.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Rocket surgeon
Mar 11, 2017
15,008
12,000
54
USA
✟301,012.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Biden's order has nothing to do with the production of natural gas. It just puts a pause on building new export facilities.

Even less so. It is a pause on new *permits* for LNG export facilities. There are several already permitted LNG export facilities that haven't begun construction yet not to mention ones under construction. The export capacity will go up a lot (double?) relative to today before the growth stops even if there are no more permits allowed. Who knows what the market will be like in 5+ years for LNG.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0