Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Are they both trying to be worse?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tatteredsoul" data-source="post: 70326671" data-attributes="member: 384460"><p>The thing is this election is very enlightening when scrutinizing the psychology of a country. Russia, China, and Israel are rubbing their hands seeing the fruits of their labor - complete destabilization and demoralization of a dominant empire like the US. </p><p></p><p>History tells us the only *productive* course of action that could possibly be non-degenerate is if the US is destroyed, and rebuilt (hint, the bird on the dollar bill is a PHOENIX, not an eagle.)</p><p></p><p>And it is true, whatever Clinton does will likely take trump a bit more time to do (war, invasion, collapse.) But, Trump is just a delay of the inevitable.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Four years ago, Trump was such a laughing stock for president that Hermann Cain, Jeb Bush, and Carly Figorina were considered better candidates for the Republican party than him. Now, he is all of a sudden the <strong>savior who will save all the regular folks from the <em>same system that has made him billions. </em></strong></p><p></p><p>This would have actually been a somewhat reputable election if a Bush was the Republican candidate, or the "illegitimate American citizen" whose father allegedly had something to do with the murder of JFK (Ted Cruz.)</p><p></p><p>Instead, we have a quarter-witted political reality show disguised poorly as a presidential election.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tatteredsoul, post: 70326671, member: 384460"] The thing is this election is very enlightening when scrutinizing the psychology of a country. Russia, China, and Israel are rubbing their hands seeing the fruits of their labor - complete destabilization and demoralization of a dominant empire like the US. History tells us the only *productive* course of action that could possibly be non-degenerate is if the US is destroyed, and rebuilt (hint, the bird on the dollar bill is a PHOENIX, not an eagle.) And it is true, whatever Clinton does will likely take trump a bit more time to do (war, invasion, collapse.) But, Trump is just a delay of the inevitable. Four years ago, Trump was such a laughing stock for president that Hermann Cain, Jeb Bush, and Carly Figorina were considered better candidates for the Republican party than him. Now, he is all of a sudden the [b]savior who will save all the regular folks from the [i]same system that has made him billions. [/i][/b] This would have actually been a somewhat reputable election if a Bush was the Republican candidate, or the "illegitimate American citizen" whose father allegedly had something to do with the murder of JFK (Ted Cruz.) Instead, we have a quarter-witted political reality show disguised poorly as a presidential election. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Are they both trying to be worse?
Top
Bottom