Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Abiogenesis and Evolution
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Justatruthseeker" data-source="post: 68868161" data-attributes="member: 332164"><p>No - accept the observational evidence - quit ignoring it. Asians are the descendants of African's and another infraspecific taxa. Stop ignoring observations of how life propagates and variation happens in a species. Stop pretending Africans became anything but Africans. African and Asian or any race mate and produce a new infraspecific taxa - at no time does the African or Asian or whatever evolve into the Afro-Asian or whatever you want to call all of them. You can't support your Fairie Dust except with more Fairie Dust.</p><p></p><p>Right before your eyes you observe the African only producing Africans. Asians only producing Asians. Hispanics only producing Hispanics. And so you can throw racist claims in too..... Husky producing only Husky. Mastiff producing only Mastiff. White tail deer producing only white tail deer. Blue whales producing only blue whales. This is all you or anyone has ever observed. And only when those infraspecific taxa within a species mate has variation ever been observed within the species.</p><p></p><p>Don't try to trick people into thinking African's magically became Africans and Asians - because just like observation has shown you it took (two) count them (two) separate infraspecific taxa to create the Asians. Just like it takes (two) count them (two) in every single change in any species you have ever observed. Don't mislead people with pseudo-science.</p><p></p><p>Accept the observational evidence that is the only thing you have ever observed. EVER.</p><p></p><p>Only people that must ignore the observational evidence to sledgehammer their theory into place would claim the opposite of what we observe. Your excuses for ignoring the observational evidence just shows how desperate you have become. A true theory would fall in line with what we observe - not try to twist the data to fit the theory - but fit the theory to the data. And all the observational data that we have says you ignore half of the equation. The other "race" that mated with Africans to produce Asians. Or more properly the "races" that Africans and Asians and all races today stem from.</p><p></p><p>Only in your mind does one thing become two. Neither Asians nor Africans evolve into an Afro-Asian. The Asian remains an Asian and the African an African. You are confused by the Fairie Dust into believing you can ignore the observational evidence. That's not science, that's blinding oneself to the truth you see all around you - because it does not conform to your theory. Re-interpreting the data to the theory - instead of the theory to the data.</p><p></p><p>I've no need of your false religion of evolution to explain variation within the species - I simply need look around me and accept the observational data of how variation within the species occurs instead of ignoring it for Fairie Dust.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Justatruthseeker, post: 68868161, member: 332164"] No - accept the observational evidence - quit ignoring it. Asians are the descendants of African's and another infraspecific taxa. Stop ignoring observations of how life propagates and variation happens in a species. Stop pretending Africans became anything but Africans. African and Asian or any race mate and produce a new infraspecific taxa - at no time does the African or Asian or whatever evolve into the Afro-Asian or whatever you want to call all of them. You can't support your Fairie Dust except with more Fairie Dust. Right before your eyes you observe the African only producing Africans. Asians only producing Asians. Hispanics only producing Hispanics. And so you can throw racist claims in too..... Husky producing only Husky. Mastiff producing only Mastiff. White tail deer producing only white tail deer. Blue whales producing only blue whales. This is all you or anyone has ever observed. And only when those infraspecific taxa within a species mate has variation ever been observed within the species. Don't try to trick people into thinking African's magically became Africans and Asians - because just like observation has shown you it took (two) count them (two) separate infraspecific taxa to create the Asians. Just like it takes (two) count them (two) in every single change in any species you have ever observed. Don't mislead people with pseudo-science. Accept the observational evidence that is the only thing you have ever observed. EVER. Only people that must ignore the observational evidence to sledgehammer their theory into place would claim the opposite of what we observe. Your excuses for ignoring the observational evidence just shows how desperate you have become. A true theory would fall in line with what we observe - not try to twist the data to fit the theory - but fit the theory to the data. And all the observational data that we have says you ignore half of the equation. The other "race" that mated with Africans to produce Asians. Or more properly the "races" that Africans and Asians and all races today stem from. Only in your mind does one thing become two. Neither Asians nor Africans evolve into an Afro-Asian. The Asian remains an Asian and the African an African. You are confused by the Fairie Dust into believing you can ignore the observational evidence. That's not science, that's blinding oneself to the truth you see all around you - because it does not conform to your theory. Re-interpreting the data to the theory - instead of the theory to the data. I've no need of your false religion of evolution to explain variation within the species - I simply need look around me and accept the observational data of how variation within the species occurs instead of ignoring it for Fairie Dust. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Abiogenesis and Evolution
Top
Bottom