Big bang theory disproved

[unitedistand]

pretty interesting how "big bang" theorists still manage to use a word naming space that also disproves the theory:

Universe
let's break this down, shall we?

the prefix in the word: Uni-.  

Definition of Uni:  prefix signifying one, once; as in uniaxial, unicellular. Uni is of Latin origion.

the main part of the word, Verse

Definition of verse: one line of poetry, Spoken sentence. Verse is also of latin origion.

Litterally, Universe means "one spoken sentence". What was that "one spoken sentence" that was spoken?  Simple.

Genesis 1:3 says it clearly:  ". . . Let there be light . . ."

 

[kaotic]

Big bang theory disproved

HAHAHAH...that's the funnest thing I have ever heard the big bang theory will never be disproved LOL. There is so many facts that back it up, and almost proves it.

 

[unitedistand]

What's even more amusing is the fact that you also support a theory that states that humankind came from fish. Does the human embryo even have formations of fins? I DON'T THINK SO!

Then again, I could see why you might question his Existance, you believed in the easter bunny as well as santa when you were younger because your parents said they did but you had no proof of that, but that's beside the point.  At least I have concrete proof of my claims.

 

[kaotic]

Originally posted by unitedistand
What's even more amusing is the fact that you also support a theory that states that humankind came from fish. Does the human embryo even have formations of fins? I DON'T THINK SO!

Huh? Well just cause you don't like the theory of evolution or the big bang they doens't change the facts that there is alot of evidence backing up both of them.

Does the human embryo even have formations of fins?

LOL does a fish embryo have fins I don't think so. LOL the fins on a fish are grown just like we grow arms.

Then again, I could see why you might question his Existance, you believed in the easter bunny as well as santa when you were younger because your parents said they did but you had no proof of that, but that's beside the point. At least I have concrete proof of my claims.

Yeah I believed them when I was a kid. So did everyone else. DUH!

What concrete proof? There is no proof of god or anything related to god.

 

[chickenman]

no, but it has gill arches - it also has many of the same developmental genes as a fish

your use of etymology to try and disprove scientific theory is amusing

 

[unitedistand]

well, as Ken Hovind has said, "Time is the evolutionist's God." You remove the element of time from the big bang theory and evolution, you can disprove both.

The law of energy states that Energy can neither be created nor destroied, just changed.

Since that's stated, the energy from the universe must've came from somewhere, and if I'm not mistaken, the big bang theory states that there was nothing before the "massive explosion".... which, from deductive reasoning, means that there wasn't even the energy to create the universe.

 

[chickenman]

particle physics disproved:

scientists have been saying for years that atoms are made up of protons, neutrons and electrons, but clearly that isn't true;

atom: from Greek atomos, indivisible

so there we have it, there cannot be any particles smaller than an atom - an atom is a single particle, electricity isn't the flow of electrons - its clearly one of god's miracles

 

[unitedistand]

yeah, invisible... not non-existant.

air is invisible as well, is it not? Can you see it or can you see the effects of it?

Don't try to mock me. You cannot disprove what I say.

 

[kaotic]

Originally posted by unitedistand
well, as Ken Hovind has said, "Time is the evolutionist's God." You remove the element of time from the big bang theory and evolution, you can disprove both.

The law of energy states that Energy can neither be created nor destroied, just changed.

Since that's stated, the energy from the universe must've came from somewhere, and if I'm not mistaken, the big bang theory states that there was nothing before the "massive explosion".... which, from deductive reasoning, means that there wasn't even the energy to create the universe.

Well I don't care what ken Hovind says doesn't know anything really about science.

Well we believe there was something before the big bang there was a Singularity. And scientist believe that the singularity was getting hotter and hotter until it couldn't hold the pressure and it had the big bang.

 

[kaotic]

Originally posted by unitedistand
yeah, invisible... not non-existant.

air is invisible as well, is it not? Can you see it or can you see the effects of it?

Don't try to mock me. You cannot disprove what I say.

Well you can't disprove the big bang. Just as we can't disprove god.

 

[chickenman]

indivisible not invisible
i'm not mocking you, i'm mocking your silly argument

 

[sulphur]

You can liquify air and it becomes visible. Of course I would not knock such an astounding revelation

 

[unitedistand]

seesaw, you really certainly cannot disprove someone who I have spoken to, someone who I've seen as a mist and another confirms as an eye witness to this expierience who actually was an athiest for a while.

 

[kaotic]

Originally posted by unitedistand
seesaw, you really certainly cannot disprove someone who I have spoken to, someone who i've seen as a mist and another confirms as an eye witness to this expierience

huh?

 

[unitedistand]

Yep. God's shown himself to me and another friend of mine in the form of a mist. His power is immense, brought me to my knees after a time. The ex-athiest felt weak in his presence.

 

I agree with you that you can't disprove that God doesn't exist to someone who's an eye witness of his presence, of his existance.

 

[kaotic]

Originally posted by unitedistand
yep. God's shown himself to me and another friend of mine in the form of a mist. His power is immense, brought me to my knees after a time. The ex-athiest felt weak in his presence.

LOL you seen god in mist heh what movie have you been watching. You say you seen god how do you know what god looks like have you been to heaven to see him? LOL sorry but I don't believe you seen god in mist. But if it makes you feel good to believe that it's cool.

 

[kaotic]

I agree with you that you can't disprove that God doesn't exist to someone who's an eye witness of his presence, of his existance.

No i meant you can't proof or disproof god there is no way god is supernatural.

 

[unitedistand]

Actually, I was in my kitchen, which has no TV in it. If your finite mind feels comforted by not believing what I told you, so be it. I know what I saw, though. The ex-athiest also knows what he saw and what he felt.  Why should I lie if what I believe teaches that it's sin to lie?  Would that not make me a hypocrite?

 

[sulphur]

I think you are in the wrong forum.Go to miracles

 

[blader]

Originally posted by chickenman
particle physics disproved:

scientists have been saying for years that atoms are made up of protons, neutrons and electrons, but clearly that isn't true;

atom: from Greek atomos, indivisible

so there we have it, there cannot be any particles smaller than an atom - an atom is a single particle, electricity isn't the flow of electrons - its clearly one of god's miracles

Nice one.

Don't try to mock me. You cannot disprove what I say.

You tried to use the dictionary definition of a word to disprove a scientific theory. This approach is logically flawed, as you can surely see from chickenman's example.