- Jan 13, 2009
- 32,459
- 7,737
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Single
ADMIN HAT
I merged two threads on the same topic
I merged two threads on the same topic
Upvote
0
According to infowars, the original report that father had his throat slit was incorrect. They're saying he was actually beheaded.
Lord have mercy.
Lord, have mercy!I am thoroughly disgusted that this occured during Mass. I am shocked and appalled.
How old are you? The reason I ask is because it seemed worse in the 1970s-1980s. Eh, maybe it was because I was a just a child myself during those years, and hearing about all those hijacked and/or blown up planes and other bombings hurt my undeveloped brain more?When will it end? I never thought I would see violence and destruction like this in my lifetime.
I'm in my 20s. And, from the studies I have done anyway, what occurred in the 70s and 80s is nothing like what is occurring now. Look at the state of the world, the middle east is in chaos and hundreds of thousands of refugees are streaming into Europe/ USA. This is a seismic cultural and demographic shift unseen since the end of the second World War. That's my view anywayHow old are you? The reason I ask is because it seemed worse in the 1970s-1980s. Eh, maybe it was because I was a just a child myself during those years, and hearing about all those hijacked and/or blown up planes and other bombings hurt my undeveloped brain more?
Ah yes, to look at it through eyes of a textbook. No harm in that whatsoever, as long as the textbook is true to fact. Never would I tell someone not to study. However, doing it only that way leaves off something. It leaves off the emotion, the perception. Only reading about it takes leaves you cold, indifferent. Cold hard facts from a textbook cannot put the same emotion into you. Now, if you were living through the time, seeing it on the news every single night, hearing everyone talking about it at the office and around your family table, just like we are doing now, it's different. Yes, even back then newscasters had the bad habit of stoking fear. That same fear was then rehashed around the water cooler and dinner table, just like now.I'm in my 20s. And, from the studies I have done anyway, what occurred in the 70s and 80s is nothing like what is occurring now. Look at the state of the world, the middle east is in chaos and hundreds of thousands of refugees are streaming into Europe/ USA. This is a seismic cultural and demographic shift unseen since the end of the second World War. That's my view anyway
I lived and recall the times you're talking about. Things are worse now. Random Islamists weren't going around in our countries killing civilians (men, women, children- people at events, concerts, going to church) back then. They are now.Ah yes, to look at it through eyes of a textbook. No harm in that whatsoever, as long as the textbook is true to fact. Never would I tell someone not to study. However, doing it only that way leaves off something. It leaves off the emotion, the perception. Only reading about it takes leaves you cold, indifferent. Cold hard facts from a textbook cannot put the same emotion into you. Now, if you were living through the time, seeing it on the news every single night, hearing everyone talking about it at the office and around your family table, just like we are doing now, it's different. Yes, even back then newscasters had the bad habit of stoking fear. That same fear was then rehashed around the water cooler and dinner table, just like now.
The point I'm trying to make is that it seems like it's worse now because it's in front of our faces NOW, while what you study from a book is past. The past is merely cold, hard fact. The past isn't as "in your face." Twenty years from now, we'll say the same thing (the past doesn't seem as bad) for the same reasons, even if the attacks do decline (which they really have, BTW).
To stop this mess, maybe Western countries will stop this, "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" without considering the consequences mentality. Just think of how things might be different if we hadn't trained and given/sold armaments to the Mujahideen. What if we didn't end up selling weapons to Iran (which was really a negotiation with terrorists to release hostages)? What if we weren't so buddy/buddy with Saddam Hussein for our economic benefit? What if we didn't prefer dictators over democratically elected governments for our economic gain (think Venezuela and even maybe Nicaragua, for an example)?
Like I said, I was just a child back then. And, I didn't say I knew everything (contrary to what my kids believe, lol). Also, I did say it was a matter of perception. You might be older than me, so your perception might be more accurate than mine.I lived and recall the times you're talking about. Things are worse now. Random Islamists weren't going around in our countries killing civilians (men, women, children- people at events, concerts, going to church) back then. They are now.
Lord, have mercy!
I'm appalled, but I'm FAR from shocked. Some of us KNEW this was coming from the get go, because this IS the real Islam. But, then, I've actually bothered to read the Quran, some hadiths, and have paid attention to things their imams say instead of going out of my way to apologize and defend Islam all the time.
I would say that humans are the problem. After all last century France got devistated by a white dude faction. Here in the states, most murders are not committed by Muslims. Just recantly there was a mass murder attack in Japan, don't think the man was Muslim. Unfortunately what all those accounts have in common is that humans can justify evil whether they are Muslim or not.Apparently more dead in Calais, France
Every. Single. Day. But Muslims aren't a problem...