Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
16 U.S. States are refusing to allow Syrian refugees
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Armoured" data-source="post: 68869307" data-attributes="member: 338129"><p>Sure ISIS has threatened to sneak terrorists in with them, knowing the threat alone will make people flip out over accepting refugees, which is <strong><em>exactly the sort of thing ISIS wants.</em></strong> Such fretting completely fails to take into account that if ISIS wanted to send out terrorists, there's no reason they couldn't fly them to their target city on commercial airlines with legal visas. Sending a terrorist to his target along a dangerous and politically indefinite overland route, where he may not even end up in the right country, is hardly the most efficient means of infiltration.</p><p></p><p>But for the sake of argument, let's say ISIS IS trying to sneak in terrorists with genuine refugees. What proportion of terrorists to refugees would you say removes the requirement to accept and process asylum claims? 1:5? 1:10? 1: 50,000?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Armoured, post: 68869307, member: 338129"] Sure ISIS has threatened to sneak terrorists in with them, knowing the threat alone will make people flip out over accepting refugees, which is [B][I]exactly the sort of thing ISIS wants.[/I][/B] Such fretting completely fails to take into account that if ISIS wanted to send out terrorists, there's no reason they couldn't fly them to their target city on commercial airlines with legal visas. Sending a terrorist to his target along a dangerous and politically indefinite overland route, where he may not even end up in the right country, is hardly the most efficient means of infiltration. But for the sake of argument, let's say ISIS IS trying to sneak in terrorists with genuine refugees. What proportion of terrorists to refugees would you say removes the requirement to accept and process asylum claims? 1:5? 1:10? 1: 50,000? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
16 U.S. States are refusing to allow Syrian refugees
Top
Bottom