Uncharted Territory, rapid warming greatly exceeds models' forecasts

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,219
9,214
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,162,711.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Land and sea temperatures have warmed much more than models forecast in the last year, and as of these articles various new factors being considered appear not enough to account for that spike. Relatively speaking it's quite large.

---------------
Nature
9 March 2024

Climate models can’t explain 2023’s huge heat anomaly — we could be in uncharted territory​

Taking into account all known factors, the planet warmed 0.2 °C more last year than climate scientists expected. More and better data are urgently needed.

For the past nine months, mean land and sea surface temperatures have overshot previous records each month by up to 0.2 °C — a huge margin at the planetary scale. A general warming trend is expected because of rising greenhouse-gas emissions, but this sudden heat spike greatly exceeds predictions made by statistical climate models that rely on past observations. Many reasons for this discrepancy have been proposed but, as yet, no combination of them has been able to reconcile our theories with what has happened.
...
So, what might have caused this heat spike? Atmospheric greenhouse-gas levels have continued to rise, but the extra load since 2022 can account for further warming of only about 0.02 °C. Other theories put forward by climate scientists include fallout from the January 2022 Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha‘apai volcanic eruption in Tonga, which had both cooling effects from aerosols and warming ones from stratospheric water vapour, and the ramping up of solar activity in the run-up to a predicted solar maximum. But these factors explain, at most, a few hundredths of a degree in warming (Schoeberl, M. R. et al. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2023GL104634; 2023). Even after taking all plausible explanations into account, the divergence between expected and observed annual mean temperatures in 2023 remains about 0.2 °C — roughly the gap between the previous and current annual record.

There is one more factor that could be playing a part. In 2020, new regulations required the shipping industry to use cleaner fuels that reduce sulfur emissions. Sulfur compounds in the atmosphere are reflective and influence several properties of clouds, thereby having an overall cooling effect. Preliminary estimates of the impact of these rules show a negligible effect on global mean temperatures — a change of only a few hundredths of a degree. ...


-----------

Also, related is more information about another factor that could turn the wrong way, increasing warming. Normally the Earth absorbs about 1/2 of emitted CO2 each year, but that might change in a bad way:


"That one-half figure is an approximation. It varies from year to year depending on weather conditions and other environmental factors, resulting in the jagged lines you see in the chart above. For example, in a warm and dry year with many wildfires, the land may absorb less carbon dioxide than usual.

As the Earth warms further, climate scientists expect the land and the ocean to absorb a smaller share of carbon dioxide emissions, causing a larger share to end up in the air, said Doug McNeall, who studies these effects at Britain’s Met Office.

Xin Lan, the lead scientist responsible for NOAA’s global carbon dioxide measurements, referred to the natural absorption as a “carbon discount.”

“We pay attention to it because we don't know at which point that this discount is gone,” she said.

In addition to carbon dioxide, the levels of other potent greenhouse gases like methane and nitrous oxide are also on the rise, which further contribute to warming."
 

AlexB23

Christian
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2023
2,955
1,749
24
WI
✟97,108.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Land and sea temperatures have warmed much more than models forecast in the last year, and as of these articles various new factors being considered appear not enough to account for that spike. Relatively speaking it's quite large.

---------------
Nature
9 March 2024

Climate models can’t explain 2023’s huge heat anomaly — we could be in uncharted territory​

Taking into account all known factors, the planet warmed 0.2 °C more last year than climate scientists expected. More and better data are urgently needed.

For the past nine months, mean land and sea surface temperatures have overshot previous records each month by up to 0.2 °C — a huge margin at the planetary scale. A general warming trend is expected because of rising greenhouse-gas emissions, but this sudden heat spike greatly exceeds predictions made by statistical climate models that rely on past observations. Many reasons for this discrepancy have been proposed but, as yet, no combination of them has been able to reconcile our theories with what has happened.
...
So, what might have caused this heat spike? Atmospheric greenhouse-gas levels have continued to rise, but the extra load since 2022 can account for further warming of only about 0.02 °C. Other theories put forward by climate scientists include fallout from the January 2022 Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha‘apai volcanic eruption in Tonga, which had both cooling effects from aerosols and warming ones from stratospheric water vapour, and the ramping up of solar activity in the run-up to a predicted solar maximum. But these factors explain, at most, a few hundredths of a degree in warming (Schoeberl, M. R. et al. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2023GL104634; 2023). Even after taking all plausible explanations into account, the divergence between expected and observed annual mean temperatures in 2023 remains about 0.2 °C — roughly the gap between the previous and current annual record.

There is one more factor that could be playing a part. In 2020, new regulations required the shipping industry to use cleaner fuels that reduce sulfur emissions. Sulfur compounds in the atmosphere are reflective and influence several properties of clouds, thereby having an overall cooling effect. Preliminary estimates of the impact of these rules show a negligible effect on global mean temperatures — a change of only a few hundredths of a degree. ...


-----------

Also, related is more information about another factor that could turn the wrong way, increasing warming. Normally the Earth absorbs about 1/2 of emitted CO2 each year, but that might change in a bad way:


"That one-half figure is an approximation. It varies from year to year depending on weather conditions and other environmental factors, resulting in the jagged lines you see in the chart above. For example, in a warm and dry year with many wildfires, the land may absorb less carbon dioxide than usual.

As the Earth warms further, climate scientists expect the land and the ocean to absorb a smaller share of carbon dioxide emissions, causing a larger share to end up in the air, said Doug McNeall, who studies these effects at Britain’s Met Office.

Xin Lan, the lead scientist responsible for NOAA’s global carbon dioxide measurements, referred to the natural absorption as a “carbon discount.”

“We pay attention to it because we don't know at which point that this discount is gone,” she said.

In addition to carbon dioxide, the levels of other potent greenhouse gases like methane and nitrous oxide are also on the rise, which further contribute to warming."
There is some slight good news. CO2 emissions per year are expected to peak globally in 2023-2024, but we are a long way off from net zero. Even if emissions peak, the amount of CO2 will still grow in the atmosphere until we stop burning fossil fuels.

1714075859661.png

 
  • Useful
Reactions: Halbhh
Upvote 0

Tinker Grey

Wanderer
Site Supporter
Feb 6, 2002
11,235
5,631
Erewhon
Visit site
✟936,197.00
Faith
Atheist
There is some slight good news. CO2 emissions per year are expected to peak globally in 2023-2024, but we are a long way off from net zero. Even if emissions peak, the amount of CO2 will still grow in the atmosphere until we stop burning fossil fuels.

View attachment 346594
Unfortunately, even if we reached net zero tomorrow, the world will stay hot for 100s of years: How long will it take temperatures to stop rising, or return to ‘normal,’ if we stop emitting greenhouse gases?

(How long CO₂ stays in the atmosphere: How do we know how long carbon dioxide remains in the atmosphere?)
 
  • Agree
Reactions: AlexB23
Upvote 0

AlexB23

Christian
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2023
2,955
1,749
24
WI
✟97,108.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Unfortunately, even if we reached net zero tomorrow, the world will stay hot for 100s of years: How long will it take temperatures to stop rising, or return to ‘normal,’ if we stop emitting greenhouse gases?

(How long CO₂ stays in the atmosphere: How do we know how long carbon dioxide remains in the atmosphere?)
Yeah, so we better start going carbon negative this century, and use CO2 scrubbers to remove CO2 from the air. We already damaged the earth, and hundreds of years is multiple generations we have harmed. :(

A byproduct of CO2 scrubbing is that we can get natural resources out of the air. Maybe we can mine diamonds out of air, turning CO2 into carbon: Revolutionary process turns carbon emissions into diamonds
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

HTacianas

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2018
8,540
9,028
Florida
✟326,511.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Land and sea temperatures have warmed much more than models forecast in the last year, and as of these articles various new factors being considered appear not enough to account for that spike. Relatively speaking it's quite large.

---------------
Nature
9 March 2024

Climate models can’t explain 2023’s huge heat anomaly — we could be in uncharted territory​

Taking into account all known factors, the planet warmed 0.2 °C more last year than climate scientists expected. More and better data are urgently needed.

For the past nine months, mean land and sea surface temperatures have overshot previous records each month by up to 0.2 °C — a huge margin at the planetary scale. A general warming trend is expected because of rising greenhouse-gas emissions, but this sudden heat spike greatly exceeds predictions made by statistical climate models that rely on past observations. Many reasons for this discrepancy have been proposed but, as yet, no combination of them has been able to reconcile our theories with what has happened.
...
So, what might have caused this heat spike? Atmospheric greenhouse-gas levels have continued to rise, but the extra load since 2022 can account for further warming of only about 0.02 °C. Other theories put forward by climate scientists include fallout from the January 2022 Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha‘apai volcanic eruption in Tonga, which had both cooling effects from aerosols and warming ones from stratospheric water vapour, and the ramping up of solar activity in the run-up to a predicted solar maximum. But these factors explain, at most, a few hundredths of a degree in warming (Schoeberl, M. R. et al. Geophys. Res. Lett. 50, e2023GL104634; 2023). Even after taking all plausible explanations into account, the divergence between expected and observed annual mean temperatures in 2023 remains about 0.2 °C — roughly the gap between the previous and current annual record.

There is one more factor that could be playing a part. In 2020, new regulations required the shipping industry to use cleaner fuels that reduce sulfur emissions. Sulfur compounds in the atmosphere are reflective and influence several properties of clouds, thereby having an overall cooling effect. Preliminary estimates of the impact of these rules show a negligible effect on global mean temperatures — a change of only a few hundredths of a degree. ...


-----------

Also, related is more information about another factor that could turn the wrong way, increasing warming. Normally the Earth absorbs about 1/2 of emitted CO2 each year, but that might change in a bad way:


"That one-half figure is an approximation. It varies from year to year depending on weather conditions and other environmental factors, resulting in the jagged lines you see in the chart above. For example, in a warm and dry year with many wildfires, the land may absorb less carbon dioxide than usual.

As the Earth warms further, climate scientists expect the land and the ocean to absorb a smaller share of carbon dioxide emissions, causing a larger share to end up in the air, said Doug McNeall, who studies these effects at Britain’s Met Office.

Xin Lan, the lead scientist responsible for NOAA’s global carbon dioxide measurements, referred to the natural absorption as a “carbon discount.”

“We pay attention to it because we don't know at which point that this discount is gone,” she said.

In addition to carbon dioxide, the levels of other potent greenhouse gases like methane and nitrous oxide are also on the rise, which further contribute to warming."

It could be that the Earth has been warming for the last 10,000 years and continues on the same course.
 
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,219
9,214
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,162,711.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It could be that the Earth has been warming for the last 10,000 years and continues on the same course.
Ok, let's look at that -- is Earth continuing on a clear path, or does it look like it's beginning to take a distinct turn/change at the moment from that path?

Here's one way of graphing it below I just found that is pretty clear.

Something unlike what we've seen in our records is happening. Also, as it's continuing, it's starting to make me wonder if we have a departure from the trend. While its too soon to be 100% sure yet for me that we are definitely in a whole new regime compared what we know about already....I'm aware the last year has already become very remarkable and challenges us to explain what's going on.


https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fbccf6d9d-1494-4ae9-b474-d436cb9a170a_1600x1442.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlexB23
Upvote 0

AlexB23

Christian
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2023
2,955
1,749
24
WI
✟97,108.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Ok, let's look at that -- is Earth continuing on a clear path, or does it look like it's beginning to take a distinct turn/change at the moment from that path?

Here's one way of graphing it below I just found that is pretty clear.

Something unlike what we've seen in our records is happening. Also, as it's continuing, it's starting to make me wonder if we have a departure from the trend. While its too soon to be 100% sure yet for me that we are definitely in a whole new regime compared what we know about already....I'm aware the last year has already become very remarkable and challenges us to explain what's going on.


https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fbccf6d9d-1494-4ae9-b474-d436cb9a170a_1600x1442.png
And this graph of CO2 here. The CO2 levels have risen steeper compared to any moment in the past 400,000 years. The current level is 420-425 PPM, so the graph is a little old. More CO2 = higher temperatures: CO2 Past

1714083849259.jpeg
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Halbhh
Upvote 0

eclipsenow

Scripture is God's word, Science is God's works
Dec 17, 2010
8,342
1,753
Sydney, Australia
Visit site
✟144,234.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Heatwaves have killed 30 people in Thailand due to heat stroke.

City authorities in Bangkok gave an extreme heat warning as the heat index was expected to rise above 52°C.​
Temperatures in the concrete sprawl of the Thai capital hit 40.1°C on Wednesday and similar levels were forecast for Thursday.​

 
Upvote 0

AlexB23

Christian
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2023
2,955
1,749
24
WI
✟97,108.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Heatwaves have killed 30 people in Thailand due to heat stroke.

City authorities in Bangkok gave an extreme heat warning as the heat index was expected to rise above 52°C.​
Temperatures in the concrete sprawl of the Thai capital hit 40.1°C on Wednesday and similar levels were forecast for Thursday.​

Dang, 52°C is 126°F. That is scorching.

From 1998-2017, over 160,000 people have died due to heat strokes: Heatwaves
 
Upvote 0

eclipsenow

Scripture is God's word, Science is God's works
Dec 17, 2010
8,342
1,753
Sydney, Australia
Visit site
✟144,234.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Yes! Have I shared this with you before? Sorry if I have - I'm all over the net these days and forget where I've shared what.

I’ve lived through some nasty heatwaves in Sydney that are 47 degrees C. They probably killed an excessive number of elderly or unwell people without access to air that did not have air-conditioning. elderly and frail people without air conditioning than usual.

But there are super-heatwaves coming that are vastly more deadly - and at LOWER temperatures. Heatwaves that will kill everyone stuck outside. The difference? At only about 35 degrees C and 100% humidity, perspiration stops cooling the human body. We start to cook.
Too Hot to Handle: How Climate Change May Make Some Places Too Hot to Live - NASA Science
Here’s PBS on it - 10 minutes. (May 2023).
There are 3 reasons electricity grids have blackouts when overheated:-
Futurist Kim Stanley Robinson is famous for writing the Red Green Blue Mars trilogy. He wrote a climate scenario called “Ministry for the Future” - and the opening chapter is one of these “Wet Bulb” heatwaves settling over some very populated regions of India. It’s just plain awful. You can read the first chapter for free here. THE MINISTRY FOR THE FUTURE
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

AlexB23

Christian
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2023
2,955
1,749
24
WI
✟97,108.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Yes! Have I shared this with you before? Sorry if I have - I'm all over the net these days and forget where I've shared what.

I’ve lived through some nasty heatwaves in Sydney that are 47 degrees C. They probably killed an excessive number of elderly or unwell people without access to air that did not have air-conditioning. elderly and frail people without air conditioning than usual.

But there are super-heatwaves coming that are vastly more deadly - and at LOWER temperatures. Heatwaves that will kill everyone stuck outside. The difference? At only about 35 degrees C and 100% humidity, perspiration stops cooling the human body. We start to cook.
Too Hot to Handle: How Climate Change May Make Some Places Too Hot to Live - NASA Science
Here’s PBS on it - 10 minutes. (May 2023).
There are 3 reasons electricity grids have blackouts when overheated:-
Futurist Kim Stanley Robinson is famous for writing the Red Green Blue Mars trilogy. He wrote a climate scenario called “Ministry for the Future” - and the opening chapter is one of these “Wet Bulb” heatwaves settling over some very populated regions of India. It’s just plain awful. You can read the first chapter for free here. THE MINISTRY FOR THE FUTURE
I might have to try The Ministry for the Future book. Yes, heatwaves are going to become a deadly killer in the future, if we do not stop burning fossil fuels.
 
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,219
9,214
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,162,711.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yes! Have I shared this with you before? Sorry if I have - I'm all over the net these days and forget where I've shared what.

I’ve lived through some nasty heatwaves in Sydney that are 47 degrees C. They probably killed an excessive number of elderly or unwell people without access to air that did not have air-conditioning. elderly and frail people without air conditioning than usual.

But there are super-heatwaves coming that are vastly more deadly - and at LOWER temperatures. Heatwaves that will kill everyone stuck outside. The difference? At only about 35 degrees C and 100% humidity, perspiration stops cooling the human body. We start to cook.
Too Hot to Handle: How Climate Change May Make Some Places Too Hot to Live - NASA Science
Here’s PBS on it - 10 minutes. (May 2023).
There are 3 reasons electricity grids have blackouts when overheated:-
Futurist Kim Stanley Robinson is famous for writing the Red Green Blue Mars trilogy. He wrote a climate scenario called “Ministry for the Future” - and the opening chapter is one of these “Wet Bulb” heatwaves settling over some very populated regions of India. It’s just plain awful. You can read the first chapter for free here. THE MINISTRY FOR THE FUTURE

I've seen the map for the U.S. by 2050 on this and it's pretty sobering. Let me search up an image.

1714137297558.jpeg

 
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,219
9,214
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,162,711.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Much of the US Will Be an ‘Extreme Heat Belt’ by the 2050s​

Heat index temperatures will hit 125°F (52°C) at least once a year in a band stretching from Texas to Wisconsin, researchers say.
595x335.jpg


 
  • Informative
Reactions: AlexB23
Upvote 0

eclipsenow

Scripture is God's word, Science is God's works
Dec 17, 2010
8,342
1,753
Sydney, Australia
Visit site
✟144,234.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
I've seen the map for the U.S. by 2050 on this and it's pretty sobering. Let me search up an image.

View attachment 346637
Increased heat in heatwaves will be bad enough, and kill a lot of people and hurt economically.

But if just ONE super 'wet-bulb' heatwave lands over a significant US city - it could kill millions or tens of millions of American citizens.

In the "Ministry for the future" (first chapter free here), India loses (sorry for the spoilers but it's in the second chapter) about 20 million people in the one heatwave! It spurs them to start their own Solar Radiation Management program immediately.

I'm not against a little SRM. Dr David Keith models that Solar Radiation Management could offset about half our warming safely - before the side effects became almost as bad as global warming itself. 8 minutes.

Smith et al 2018 showed it would be cheap. Back then it was about $2.25 billion annually to eventually hit 0.3 degrees of cooling after 15 years of building out a fleet of planes (at 6 super-wide wing jets per year = 0.02 degrees cooling per 6 jets.) Today let’s call it $4 billion annual costs. That’s not a lot of money if we need it to stop climate change going over 1.5 degrees. ShieldSquare Error
 
Upvote 0

eclipsenow

Scripture is God's word, Science is God's works
Dec 17, 2010
8,342
1,753
Sydney, Australia
Visit site
✟144,234.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married

Much of the US Will Be an ‘Extreme Heat Belt’ by the 2050s​

Heat index temperatures will hit 125°F (52°C) at least once a year in a band stretching from Texas to Wisconsin, researchers say.
595x335.jpg


Wow - that's nasty. I'm kinda flat out at the moment with some other projects -anyone got humidity estimates for this area? Remember - it only takes 36 C and 100% humidity to kill fit young people as well as the frail and elderly. Everyone.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: AlexB23
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

AlexB23

Christian
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2023
2,955
1,749
24
WI
✟97,108.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Unfortunately, even if we reached net zero tomorrow, the world will stay hot for 100s of years: How long will it take temperatures to stop rising, or return to ‘normal,’ if we stop emitting greenhouse gases?

(How long CO₂ stays in the atmosphere: How do we know how long carbon dioxide remains in the atmosphere?)
Ooh, another interesting tidbit of information about the article you gave me. The scientists who determined that the Earth would stay hot for centuries, even if our emissions went to 0 tons of CO2 today, used advanced computer modeling using a software known as Sky2050 (from the same article you posted). :) That would be a fun job to have, cos data analysis and AI is fascinating. For myself, I run a free, private and local AI on my laptop, the Mistral 7B large-language model. I use the local AI to explain Bible verses, win arguments with climate deniers (by summarizing a verse on stewardship), ask it heavy ethics questions, and summarize information when need be. But, running the AI drains my laptop battery in < 4 hours. It is energy intensive.

Another thing that is energy intensive is the supercomputing industry. There is something slightly ironic about modeling our warming climate on a mainframe. A supercomputer uses a lot of electricity, so simulating the climate on a supercomputer releases a lot of CO2 also, assuming the supercomputer is connected to a predominantly fossil fuel powered grid. Luckily, the Finnish made a supercomputer that runs on 100% hydroelectricity. Hey, of course, green computing had to be from the Europeans.

Sources:
Paper on the AI on my laptop (80% of the paper goes over my head): https://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.06825v1
Information Technology releases ~2% of global emissions: The carbon footprint of computational research - Nature Computational Science
Earth System Modeling must become more efficient (opinion piece): Earth System Modeling Must Become More Energy Efficient - Eos
Finnish supercomputer runs on hydropower: https://lumi-supercomputer.eu/lumi-one-of-the-greenest-supercomputers-in-the-world/

The Finnish LUMI supercomputer
1714318508385.jpeg
 
Upvote 0

AlexB23

Christian
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2023
2,955
1,749
24
WI
✟97,108.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

Much of the US Will Be an ‘Extreme Heat Belt’ by the 2050s​

Heat index temperatures will hit 125°F (52°C) at least once a year in a band stretching from Texas to Wisconsin, researchers say.
595x335.jpg


Dang, I live in WI, and 2050 is only 26 years away. I do not want 120°F+ (50°C) heat indexes here.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Rocket surgeon
Mar 11, 2017
15,205
12,162
54
USA
✟304,071.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Ooh, another interesting tidbit of information about the article you gave me. The scientists who determined that the Earth would stay hot for centuries, even if our emissions went to 0 tons of CO2 today, used advanced computer modeling using a software known as Sky2050 (from the same article you posted). :)
Sky2050 is the name of a particular scenario that was investigated by that group, it is not the name of the software. The exact name of the GCM is not given in that website, but it would be in a scientific paper where the Sky2050 results were presented.
That would be a fun job to have, cos data analysis and AI is fascinating. For myself, I run a free, private and local AI on my laptop, the Mistral 7B large-language model. I use the local AI to explain Bible verses, win arguments with climate deniers (by summarizing a verse on stewardship), ask it heavy ethics questions, and summarize information when need be. But, running the AI drains my laptop battery in < 4 hours. It is energy intensive.
There are many types of AI, some of them are useful, all of them are resource pigs (as you found out).
Another thing that is energy intensive is the supercomputing industry. There is something slightly ironic about modeling our warming climate on a mainframe.
Weather and climate modeling have always been run on serious hardware requiring large amounts of power.
A supercomputer uses a lot of electricity, so simulating the climate on a supercomputer releases a lot of CO2 also, assuming the supercomputer is connected to a predominantly fossil fuel powered grid. Luckily, the Finnish made a supercomputer that runs on 100% hydroelectricity. Hey, of course, green computing had to be from the Europeans.
The biggest problems related to power usage in supercomputers is power density and cooling. The power-consuming units are packed so tightly that it is difficult to remove the waste heat. Recently the industry has moved to warm-water cooling. In the past (~15 years ago) nearly all supercomputers were cooled by running chilled air through them. Now most large supercomputers are cooled by using warm water. Water comes in at ambient temperatures, gets heated to sub-boiling temperature by the components and then cooled outside. This configuration allows less active cooling to be used even in hot climates. In some climates entirely passive cooling of the heated water may be possible.

The LUMI supercomputer is American technology. (It was built in your state of Wisconsin.) The "green" aspects of this system involve the power source (hydro) and design of the cooling systems.
Sources:
Paper on the AI on my laptop (80% of the paper goes over my head): https://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.06825v1
Information Technology releases ~2% of global emissions: The carbon footprint of computational research - Nature Computational Science
I read that editorial. It was a bit overblown. 2% of all emissions is *ALL* of IT including the big internet companies. Supercomputers are a small fraction of that. Even the largest supercomputer uses less power than one Amazon/Facebook/Google/Apple data center.
Earth System Modeling must become more efficient (opinion piece): Earth System Modeling Must Become More Energy Efficient - Eos
Finnish supercomputer runs on hydropower: LUMI one of the greenest supercomputers in the world - LUMI

The Finnish LUMI supercomputer
View attachment 346763
 
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,219
9,214
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,162,711.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Increased heat in heatwaves will be bad enough, and kill a lot of people and hurt economically.

But if just ONE super 'wet-bulb' heatwave lands over a significant US city - it could kill millions or tens of millions of American citizens.

In the "Ministry for the future" (first chapter free here), India loses (sorry for the spoilers but it's in the second chapter) about 20 million people in the one heatwave! It spurs them to start their own Solar Radiation Management program immediately.

I'm not against a little SRM. Dr David Keith models that Solar Radiation Management could offset about half our warming safely - before the side effects became almost as bad as global warming itself. 8 minutes.

Smith et al 2018 showed it would be cheap. Back then it was about $2.25 billion annually to eventually hit 0.3 degrees of cooling after 15 years of building out a fleet of planes (at 6 super-wide wing jets per year = 0.02 degrees cooling per 6 jets.) Today let’s call it $4 billion annual costs. That’s not a lot of money if we need it to stop climate change going over 1.5 degrees. ShieldSquare Error
An super strong wet bulb heatwave could indeed kill more than only hundreds (as is in the past in the U.S.) if the surging power demand overwhelms the electrical transmission system somewhere so that A/C systems go down. That kind of situation would escalate deaths tremendously.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Site Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,219
9,214
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,162,711.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Dang, I live in WI, and 2050 is only 26 years away. I do not want 120°F+ (50°C) heat indexes here.
Well, I notice that WI residents don't have to travel as far to get to a more likely cooler zone like Lake Michigan beach or such, where even if the power grid went down, if you get in that cool water in the northern half of the lake, you're going to feel cooled down nicely I'm thinking. So, while normally you'd have A/C during a really hot day, if the grid goes down, you are far more likely to be able to get relief than someone in Texas or Florida.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlexB23
Upvote 0