Yet Again, At Planet Fitness...

Status
Not open for further replies.

rjs330

Well-Known Member
CF Ambassadors
May 22, 2015
22,825
6,181
64
✟341,012.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Why is it so hard for the right to let go of gender assignments and care nothing for personal privacy? I'll tell you why.....The Right (more accurately the conservatives or better yet Neo-Cons) legislate based on Judeo-Christian values and a unified national identity not tainted by things like a free-thinking, individual value system, or an "alternative lifestyle." It's all about conforming to Biblical laws and the morality it teaches. Not believing that people have a right to be different than them. It's all about conformity and maintaining the status quo. The definition of conservative is "as little change as possible" or "never change." they would rather force business owners to watch the door of the restroom rather than just provide privacy for their patrons.
Personal.privacy? That's funny when all the women want is personal privacy and the left is hell bent on taking it away from them. And if this was such a private matter why are they demanding to do into spaces where they know is going to create an issue?

I'm wondering if you are spending far too much time on these forums. You should spend more time elsewhere and you'll discover there are a LOT of people out there who are not Christians, but are atheists, agnostics, gay, doctors, therapists, biologists, endocrinologists etc who have nothing to do with Christianity or even conservatism who are opposed to this.

As I have proven to you, Conservatives don't really care if a business creates individual bathrooms or individual locker rooms/shower spaces. You won't find any of us marching in front of a business who decides to get rid of mens and women's rooms and instead builds individual bathrooms.

And conservative don't oppose change. You do know that change isn't always for the best right? After all Hitler brought change. Change can actually be bad for society or for a group of people. Change can be good as well. There is change we support and change we don't. You have to prove to us that this change is good for society and good for women. And I'm not just speaking about about individual bathrooms.
 
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
CF Ambassadors
May 22, 2015
22,825
6,181
64
✟341,012.00
Faith
Pentecostal
When did I ever say that? I said there would be no need for a men's or women's restroom if they made all of the stalls private
Is that what trans people are clamoring for? When's the last time you heard a man who claims to be a woman demand that he should have his own bathroom? Or even demanding that everyone have their own bathroom and mini locker room with shower?
There seems to be a problem with conservatives groaning about who's a man and who's a women and how do we separate them effectively but there is no room in the conservative mind for private stalls across the board.
Literally no one has said that. In fact you know that your stalls comment isn't the right wings position. In fact when said that we don't care if a business wants to put in those stalls they can and we're okay with that you said it was a right wing view. So you know good and well that there is plenty of room for those private stalls.

It is actually the left who is groaning about who a man or a woman is. We know what one is and can tell you. It's the left that can't seem to figure it out. Apparently it's some amorphous thing that no one can really say and there is no way to prove it one way or another. No wonder you can't figure out how to separate them. If you don't know what one is that makes perfect sense. But we do know and know exactly how to separate them.
What's wrong with that other than the need to enforce Christian values on the general public. It's more about making laws based on Christianity than providing privacy for everyone.
Since when did separating men and women in their private spaces for bathrooms and showers etc become only a Christian value?
 
Upvote 0

BPPLEE

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
10,179
3,645
60
Montgomery
✟146,546.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Ok? I'm sorry but what do video games have to do with civil rights?

And you would because the right wing has indoctrinated you to believe that people should walk, talk, and act a certain way that is in line with Judeo-Christian values, not civil rights.

Yes.

Have people's rights really been tampered with other than the rights of Judeo-Christian white maleswho are year by year being stripped of their rights to discriminate against people that don't agree with their racist/sexist/homophobic ideology?

What is the rest of it? See, this right-wing stance makes it uncomfortable for them to accept gays and gender-benders' rights to privacy. You seem to still be stuck on keeping men and women out of each other's toilets and showers instead of just providing privacy for men, women, and children Why is that so much more difficult to do than watching who goes in and out on your business's public restrooms because you want to make sure that one is for men and one is for women? Provide privacy for men, women, and children and it's problem solved. But it's not about protecting women, for their rights it's about preserving Judeao-Christian values and forcing those values on everyone in the United States.

True, especially the conservatives who on average desire gays and transgender people to go back in the closet when they have now been protected by the civil rights laws that were passed over fifty years ago. I'm not saying that I blame the conservatives for wanting to preserve their way of life but time moves on and we can't force these free people back into the closet.

What you claim to be a special privilege, I say is observing American citizen's civil rights. Is eliminating white-only water fountains giving people "special privileges." I suppose a conservative would consider having privacy in your shower a "special privilege." but in modern society, these "alternative lifestyle" people actually have civil rights. I don't blame you for promoting that gays and trans people shouldn't be granted "special privileges" (ie civil rights) but in this day and age, that worldview has been dropped and the government concludes that they are protected by civil rights laws though I know how righteous it feels to vilify a group of people as a conservative. Hate gays and trans people all you want but according to Federal law, you can't discriminate against them. Even though it would feel so good to lock up all sexual devients, they have rights..

It wasn't as traumatic as just uncomfortable. I have a hard time believing that you (like the other conservatives) feel like it is impossible to provide privacy for urinators and defecators but it's not that hard. In this time of technology and the availability of carpentry products, it's only religious ideology that prevents privacy in restrooms, not economics.

Again, it's not a special privilege, it's the right to privacy protected by the Constitution. The fact that conservatism completely ignores this fact just confirms that conservatives are more interested in preserving Judeo-Christian values than secular civil rights. You (and some of your fellow conservative posters) confirm this with every post that calls for eliminating trans people's right to use a restroom rather than guaranteeing all citizens the right to privacy as it relates to their naked or half-dressed bodies. It is conservative religious values which are being preserved in this issue rather than citizen's civil rights.

Gay marriage is one thing. Excluding gays and trans people from their ability to defend their civil rights in another

Well, the leaders in the field of mental health have decided that the desire of one to change their gender is a diagnosable condition and not a fashion statement. See, promoting that these people are just making lifestyle choices based on lust is a textbook conservative position. Not accepting that this is a medical and mental issue just fuels the fires of the conservative belief that this is a moral and sexual preference issue. This disregards their mental health needs and physical need for a doctor to examine their condition. It's not for some random denomination's moral insight to judge whether or not a mentally ill person deserves treatment or ridicule. The conservatives seem to side with their supposed moral superiority.

That's what makes it hard to understand how someone who has no interest in religion could be so brainwashed into pushing Christian morality on those who are fighting for secular rights. So the question becomes do you support conservative religious morality more than secular civil rights? It would seem to me it's impossible to be invested in both ideologies.

When it comes to mental health, it's not always a choice to have non-Judeao-Christian values or abnormal desires as it relates to the movement of conserviteves to shove gays and trans people back in the closet.

I refuse to buy into the whole oppression of the white man's conservative lie. White men still make more money, own more property, and are given more consideration for promotions, business loans, and invitations by real estate agents to cherry-pick the most exclusive places to live. White men aren't oppressed, they just more and more are being taken to task for being racist, having racist hiring and promotion practices, and the biggest one, not being as easily allowed to discriminate against minorities. I think that's one of the biggest things that have bothered conservatives since the 50's or 60's. Minorities now have enforceable civil rights and it bothers the heck out of many conservatives (not all, but the ones that you seem to support as a conservative apologist.

If they are wearing a dress, it's a national emergency it seems.

So do you really believe that a transgender woman would prefer to shower with women that have natural female bodies? It's very conservative to believe that these he-she's would rather just shower in privacy.

What discrimination? There has always been a class system in the USA but whites were never slaves. It's not in their history and there are no lasting effects from slavery and Jim Crow in the white community. Oh wait I remember, the US has no "system" and the white race has never benefitted from it throughout American history. Even though white men while doing the same jobs make more money than every other group and receive less jail time for breaking, they are really the ones being exploited and discriminated against in the US. Just another top-tier conservative claim with no data to support it. Again, the feeling of being discriminated against is the feeling of not being allowed to discriminate against minorities and women.

Don't get me wrong, there are white men who suffer under poverty and lack of a proper public school but as a whole they are way more connected and make way more money than anyone who's not white and trying to join the1%
Evidently you don’t read or can’t comprehend what other people post, you just spew left wing rhetoric and accuse others of doing what you are actually doing yourself.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: rjs330
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
CF Ambassadors
May 22, 2015
22,825
6,181
64
✟341,012.00
Faith
Pentecostal
. I am of the opinion a subset of radical feminists want men out of their spaces. Those were the ones you linked to and specifically referenced. If there are others feel free to quote them. I did a search for women's groups opposed to trans bathrooms and found no one other hits.
Oh and what your evidence for only a subset want men out of women's locker rooms? In other words if a woman wants a man out of their private spaces they are a radical feminist. What exactly is a radical feminist to you? You think there is something wrong with radical feminists?

Are only women's groups allowed to have an opinion? What about individual women who aren't part of a group? All four of my daughters and my wife are against it. None of them are radical feminists.

All the women at my work are against it and I think they'd be insulted if you called them all radical feminists. None of them are Christians. And not all my daughters are conservatives.

MSN

Are all those women radical feminists?

If it happened to my granddaughter, I would be upset for sure," said Santee resident Paula Dwyer.

"Children and women have rights to privacy," added Santee resident Sheri Miles. "We shouldn't be invaded when we are in the bathroom or the locker room or God help us, the shower. It's wrong!"


Radical feminists again?

‘Trans’ Man Competed Against Girls, Used Women’s Locker Room...and That's Not Even the Worst Part

I suppose all those girls and their mothers are all radical feminists too?

Trans student exposed girls to male genitalia in school locker room, legal group claims

Radical feminists?

But none of these girls count? There are a LOT of women who are opposed to this. They aren't members of some women's organizations. They are radical feminists, they aren't right right Christians, they are just women. Period. And for you to ignore them is nothing more then establishing your patriarchal "I know what's best for women" rhetoric.
 
Upvote 0

Belk

Senior Member
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2005
28,456
13,207
Seattle
✟918,188.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Oh and what your evidence for only a subset want men out of women's locker rooms? In other words if a woman wants a man out of their private spaces they are a radical feminist. What exactly is a radical feminist to you? You think there is something wrong with radical feminists?

Are only women's groups allowed to have an opinion? What about individual women who aren't part of a group? All four of my daughters and my wife are against it. None of them are radical feminists.

All the women at my work are against it and I think they'd be insulted if you called them all radical feminists. None of them are Christians. And not all my daughters are conservatives.

MSN

Are all those women radical feminists?

If it happened to my granddaughter, I would be upset for sure," said Santee resident Paula Dwyer.

"Children and women have rights to privacy," added Santee resident Sheri Miles. "We shouldn't be invaded when we are in the bathroom or the locker room or God help us, the shower. It's wrong!"


Radical feminists again?

‘Trans’ Man Competed Against Girls, Used Women’s Locker Room...and That's Not Even the Worst Part

I suppose all those girls and their mothers are all radical feminists too?

Trans student exposed girls to male genitalia in school locker room, legal group claims

Radical feminists?

But none of these girls count? There are a LOT of women who are opposed to this. They aren't members of some women's organizations. They are radical feminists, they aren't right right Christians, they are just women. Period. And for you to ignore them is nothing more then establishing your patriarchal "I know what's best for women" rhetoric.
Hey look! Actual evidence. Well done I knew you could do it. In answer to your question yes they count. Their voices should be heard. Just like the people on the other side of the debate.

Oh. And I acknowledge there are more then just radical feminists view on the topic. To be clear I am not sure I buy that there are a lot of men who are simply trying to "Protect women" but it is a valid point of view so you were correct on that.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
CF Ambassadors
May 22, 2015
22,825
6,181
64
✟341,012.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Hey look! Actual evidence. Well done I knew you could do it. In answer to your question yes they count. Their voices should be heard. Just like the people on the other side of the debate.

Oh. And I acknowledge there are more then just radical feminists view on the topic. To be clear I am not sure I buy that there are a lot of men who are simply trying to "Protect women" but it is a valid point of view so you were correct on that.
If you knew I could do it then you knew it existed. So it appears to be that you just wanted me to waste my time. Riley Gaines said in one of her interviews that she was frustrated because she and other women were speaking out and no one was helping them. Well that's men are helping. She didn't say no other women where helping.

You don't have to buy anything. Believe us or don't. That's a choice. We haven't said or done anything on this issue to make you question our motives. One thing I've learned though after our little exercise. I won't be doing any more "research" for you because you already know. You just want me to waste my time. Not going to do it again.
 
Upvote 0

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
37,749
11,496
✟440,712.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Ok? I'm sorry but what do video games have to do with civil rights?

It's not important.



Ok...what right is being violated here?

Have people's rights really been tampered with other than the rights of Judeo-Christian white maleswho are year by year being stripped of their rights to discriminate against people that don't agree with their racist/sexist/homophobic ideology?

I don't see what this has to do with my post.


What is the rest of it? See, this right-wing stance makes it uncomfortable for them to accept gays and gender-benders' rights to privacy.

The rest of it would be pronouns, prisons, sports, childhood healthcare, education, etc.

You don't really have any right to privacy....apart from a right to unwarranted publicity.


Yeah, that's how it works in a democracy.

What you claim to be a special privilege, I say is observing American citizen's civil rights.

Ok....what rights?


Is eliminating white-only water fountains giving people "special privileges."

No...but you aren't eliminating white only water fountains. You're letting men into women's restrooms.

Hate gays and trans people all you want but according to Federal law, you can't discriminate against them.
I don't think there's any federal law protecting trans people.

An addition to the civil rights amendment was added by Biden but that's not a valid way to change an amendment. That's why so many states are able to write these laws about education, restrooms, sports, I think a state even recently passed a law against "gender affirming care". They can do this...because Biden cannot unilaterally decide to alter an amendment.



It wasn't as traumatic as just uncomfortable.

Ok.


Again, it's not a special privilege, it's the right to privacy protected by the Constitution.

From unwarranted publicity. You don't really have a right to privacy in public.



Gay marriage is one thing. Excluding gays and trans people from their ability to defend their civil rights in another

You haven't brought up any civil rights. You keep mentioning privacy, but public restrooms are public.



Well, the leaders in the field of mental health have decided that the desire of one to change their gender is a diagnosable condition and not a fashion statement.

Very very recently some things have come out about those leaders....

1. They're frauds. In private conversations, they've admitted to not really knowing what they're doing and have put children at risk.

2. They've permanently damaged children. The first real long term, large scale, study on puberty blockers shows that children taking them have underdeveloped genitalia, and a high percentage of boys are effectively sterilized.

3. A large scale review of all the research used by these medical leaders concluded in England. It shows (like the Swedish meta-study did) that the research is low quality garbage and far below the standards of healthcare for children.

Essentially, everyone opposing this stuff was correct (even the Christians opposing it for religious or bigoted reasons) and all the people supporting it...have been supporting the medical experimentation on children that's caused lifelong damage (you).

Just thought you should know this if you aren't up to speed on recent developments on the issue. You aren’t some moral crusader fighting for rights....you've enabled mentally ill people to damage children for life.

You remember JK Rowling? Remember how they claimed that she was transphobic and hateful towards trans people? Now they're asking her if she would forgive the Harry Potter actors if they apologized to her. Turns out she was right all along. In fact, there's multiple doctors and activists who lost their jobs over this now being praised as heros for their bravery for fighting for children at great personal cost. Smart people lost their jobs for speaking out against this...

It may take weeks or months for this to trickle down to your area....but don't be surprised if at the very least, puberty blockers, HRT, or even gender affirming care gets banned for harming many many children. That's part of what you're supporting here....harming children.

That's what makes it hard to understand how someone who has no interest in religion could be so brainwashed into pushing Christian morality on those who are fighting for secular rights.

Oh that's easy...

1. I'm educated and can read a study well enough to understand it's flaws. I've known the research on this stuff is quackery for awhile now.

2. I don't see any rights being violated. Trans people have restrooms and showers they can use....same as me and you....they simply aren't allowed to violate women's spaces for reasons like the one in the OP.

3. The methods of trans activists are reprehensible. They lie to people like you, tell people lies like trans people are being murdered or committing suicide as children at astounding rates. They infringe upon the rights of others without any regard for the damage done. There's nothing good about them.



I refuse to buy into the whole oppression of the white man's conservative lie.

No kidding. You support discrimination. I can show you DEI experts saying this....I can show you white men winning discrimination lawsuits after being fired by their employers after they hired a DEI racist. I can point out the examples of racism from this administration. I can cite studies done showing that hiring managers and HR people admit they've been told to discriminate against white men.

You're in full blown denial because you support racial discrimination....and that clashes with your feelings of moral righteousness that you get by supporting mentally ill trans people.


White men

Do you think it's acceptable for businesses and schools to deny white men opportunities in favor of racial minorities?


Yes or no?

So do you really believe that a transgender woman would prefer to shower with women that have natural female bodies?

That's what they say.


What discrimination?

See above.

Here's a recent example...


Here's an older example...


Here's an example from this administration...


If you read past the intro, you'll see examples on examples. I understand that every racist thinks their racism towards a group of people is justified for "reasons" from the KKK of the 1800s to today's modern left...but I don't think you have some moral high ground which to judge me from. I'm not denying trans people any rights....and I'm certainly not in favor of racial discrimination against anyone, not just white people.

Don't get me wrong, there are white men who suffer under poverty

There's more whites in poverty than any other racial group....and last I checked, the poorest county in the US was mostly white.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: BPPLEE
Upvote 0

Belk

Senior Member
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2005
28,456
13,207
Seattle
✟918,188.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
If you knew I could do it then you knew it existed. So it appears to be that you just wanted me to waste my time. Riley Gaines said in one of her interviews that she was frustrated because she and other women were speaking out and no one was helping them. Well that's men are helping. She didn't say no other women where helping.

You don't have to buy anything. Believe us or don't. That's a choice. We haven't said or done anything on this issue to make you question our motives. One thing I've learned though after our little exercise. I won't be doing any more "research" for you because you already know. You just want me to waste my time. Not going to do it again.
I did not know. As I stated I did a search and did not find any data. I think the data you found is vanishingly small but it does exist, as I acknowledged. Not to worry though, I'm sure you will be able to act affronted without any of my input.
 
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
CF Ambassadors
May 22, 2015
22,825
6,181
64
✟341,012.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Oh that's easy...
What I find is so many on the left thing the only people who oppose this are Christians. Secondly they think the only reason Christians oppose it is because they are Christians. It's like they ignore every single post where we outline specific scientific, philosophical and psychological reasons why we don't support this. Quite frankly it's a bit bigoted. I mean how many of us Christians are pounding the Bibles on this subject and shouting "God says..."? Take a look in this thread. I think a non-believer was the first one to mention something religious and then there was a short discussion on homosexuality. But I don't think one person said anything about Christianity and transgenderism except some unbeliever.

That's the way it always seems to be on this subject. It's like there is something in the liberal brain that says that Christians are the only people who would oppose it and if we do it's only on religious grounds and we have no brain or thought in out head of any other reason whatsoever.

Yet we are the ones saying exactly what you are saying.

Yeah it's easy all right when you really look at it. I never have to quote one single scripture or even mention the word God in this debate. And I don't.
 
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
CF Ambassadors
May 22, 2015
22,825
6,181
64
✟341,012.00
Faith
Pentecostal
I did not know. As I stated I did a search and did not find any data. I think the data you found is vanishingly small but it does exist, as I acknowledged. Not to worry though, I'm sure you will be able to act affronted without any of my input.
I don't believe you. You said you knew I could do it, prove my point. Do with it what you will. I'm not affronted. I'm just not going to waste my time proving anything to you anymore. You've been on these types of threads many times. If you haven't seen the evidence fro what we've been saying by now, you are never going to. I think its more likely that you ignore it or just want us to waste time. So I've just elected not to waste time on you anymore.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Belk

Senior Member
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2005
28,456
13,207
Seattle
✟918,188.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
I don't believe you. You said you knew I could do it, prove my point.
Nope. I explicitly said "Offer evidence".

Do with it what you will. I'm not affronted.

I guess that leaves us both not believing the other.
I'm just not going to waste my time proving anything to you anymore. You've been on these types of threads many times. If you haven't seen the evidence fro what we've been saying by now, you are never going to. I think its more likely that you ignore it or just want us to waste time. So I've just elected not to waste time on you anymore.

Well, thank you for the clarity. That I can appreciate.
 
Upvote 0

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
37,749
11,496
✟440,712.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
What I find is so many on the left thing the only people who oppose this are Christians. Secondly they think the only reason Christians oppose it is because they are Christians. It's like they ignore every single post where we outline specific scientific, philosophical and psychological reasons why we don't support this. Quite frankly it's a bit bigoted. I mean how many of us Christians are pounding the Bibles on this subject and shouting "God says..."? Take a look in this thread. I think a non-believer was the first one to mention something religious and then there was a short discussion on homosexuality. But I don't think one person said anything about Christianity and transgenderism except some unbeliever.

That's the way it always seems to be on this subject. It's like there is something in the liberal brain that says that Christians are the only people who would oppose it and if we do it's only on religious grounds and we have no brain or thought in out head of any other reason whatsoever.

Yet we are the ones saying exactly what you are saying.

Yeah it's easy all right when you really look at it. I never have to quote one single scripture or even mention the word God in this debate. And I don't.

I'm sure you recall back when every response to gay marriage was "homophobia".

Then it was Islamophobia.

Then every criticism legitimate or not of Obama was racism.

By the time we got to Trump, everyone capable of making an argument on the left was either gone or drowned out by people who only attack the character of those who disagree with them.
 
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
CF Ambassadors
May 22, 2015
22,825
6,181
64
✟341,012.00
Faith
Pentecostal
I'm sure you recall back when every response to gay marriage was "homophobia".

Then it was Islamophobia.

Then every criticism legitimate or not of Obama was racism.

By the time we got to Trump, everyone capable of making an argument on the left was either gone or drowned out by people who only attack the character of those who disagree with them.
Yes I do. Now it's transphobia. Their so called arguments have grown so thin anymore that claiming a phobia is about all they have anymore.
 
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
38,126
17,595
Finger Lakes
✟215,408.00
Country
United States
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
If it's the same guy then he's the first on this planet to claim he trans walk into a women's locker room, expose himself and ask someone to shower with him. I honestly don't think bi-polar works that way.
How exactly do manic episodes work in your experience?
 
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
CF Ambassadors
May 22, 2015
22,825
6,181
64
✟341,012.00
Faith
Pentecostal
How exactly do manic episodes work in your experience?
I've got a father in law that is bi-polar and have delt with the experiences. I've also delt with it in my employment. If you can provide some evidence that bi-polar causes this sort of thing I'd be happy to look at it. You know people who going through an episode who think they are the opposite sex, claim they are trans and walk into women's locker rooms and parade around naked and ask women to lather up and take a shower with them?

That's the problem with you trans supporters. You will excuse any behaviors of anyone claiming to be trans.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

rturner76

Domine non-sum dignus
Site Supporter
May 10, 2011
10,682
3,634
Twin Cities
✟739,103.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
What is any of that going to do about a biological male walking around naked in the women’s locker room?
That is where in modern times (as in not 1955), we have the technology to make locker room shower stalls private with locking doors. That is assuming that people know that it is not mandatory to make shower stalls that can be peeked into. I'm convinced that this is the point where conservatives and progressives part ways. One side believes that we are capable in this day and age to install a private shower stall. The alternative would seem to be that as humans, we are not capable of fabricating a private shower stall. I'm sure that over and over, all around the world, private toilets and showers are being manufactured.

If we want to believe that carpenters are not capable of fabricating a private stall or shower, how would people finance custom kitchens and bathrooms?

What seems (in my opinion) to be the reason people believe this may not be possible is because of their personal opinion that we should not have to offer our children a private place to shower or to use the restroom. This is the definition of conservative:
adjective:
1) averse to change or innovation and holding traditional values.
2) (in a political context) favoring free enterprise, private ownership, and socially traditional ideas
noun:
1) a person who is averse to change and holds traditional values
2) a person favoring free enterprise, private ownership, and socially traditional ideas

These definitions of conservative would seem to indicate that it is not so much that we are not capable of installing private toilets and showers but conservatives simply don't want to be bothered to comply with modern privacy standards. They seem to be more comfortable refusing to provide privacy in order to force people to remain in the closet or be disowned by their families. This would be because of the conservative view that change is bad and allowing anybody to be some.

So my question ends up being, who has given the conservative constituency the right to decide who deserves privacy and who should be required to appear naked in public? Is this the will of the conservative God or is it the will of the secular government that controls our nation? Also, is it legal or even fair to determine the morality of other people's children?
 
Upvote 0

BPPLEE

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
10,179
3,645
60
Montgomery
✟146,546.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That is where in modern times (as in not 1955), we have the technology to make locker room shower stalls private with locking doors. That is assuming that people know that it is not mandatory to make shower stalls that can be peeked into. I'm convinced that this is the point where conservatives and progressives part ways. One side believes that we are capable in this day and age to install a private shower stall. The alternative would seem to be that as humans, we are not capable of fabricating a private shower stall. I'm sure that over and over, all around the world, private toilets and showers are being manufactured.

If we want to believe that carpenters are not capable of fabricating a private stall or shower, how would people finance custom kitchens and bathrooms?

What seems (in my opinion) to be the reason people believe this may not be possible is because of their personal opinion that we should not have to offer our children a private place to shower or to use the restroom. This is the definition of conservative:
adjective:
1) averse to change or innovation and holding traditional values.
2) (in a political context) favoring free enterprise, private ownership, and socially traditional ideas
noun:
1) a person who is averse to change and holds traditional values
2) a person favoring free enterprise, private ownership, and socially traditional ideas

These definitions of conservative would seem to indicate that it is not so much that we are not capable of installing private toilets and showers but conservatives simply don't want to be bothered to comply with modern privacy standards. They seem to be more comfortable refusing to provide privacy in order to force people to remain in the closet or be disowned by their families. This would be because of the conservative view that change is bad and allowing anybody to be some.

So my question ends up being, who has given the conservative constituency the right to decide who deserves privacy and who should be required to appear naked in public? Is this the will of the conservative God or is it the will of the secular government that controls our nation? Also, is it legal or even fair to determine the morality of other people's children?
You’re clueless as to what I believe and everyone doesn’t fit neatly into your stereotypes. It seems your only knowledge of conservatives is some definition you’ve read and that makes you an expert. in your own mind.
I don’t know of any conservative group or individuals who are opposed to having private bathroom and shower stalls. You don’t understand conservatives at all and I don’t fit into the box that you’re trying to put all conservatives into.
There are no conservative groups in charge of any business“ bathroom, dressing room or shower policy.. There may be people who disagree with these businesses policies and they are stating their opinions as is their right.
They don’t make policies for businesses as far as I know.
You basically have a conspiracy theory that conservatives are dictating who deserves privacy and who is required to appear naked.
Conservatives don’t have this authority or ability.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Status
Not open for further replies.